The humble Bayesian: Model checking from a fully Bayesian perspective

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 68-75

  Morey, Richard D ^a   Romeijn, Jan Willem ^a   Rouder, Jeffrey N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; HUMAN; NOTE; PHILOSOPHY;

BAYES THEOREM; HUMANS; PHILOSOPHY;

EID: 84872540826     PISSN: 00071102     EISSN: 20448317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02067.x     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. Bailer-Jones, D. M. (2003). When scientific models represent. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17, 59-74. doi:10.1080/02698590305238
2. Berger, J. (2006). The case for objective Bayesian analysis. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 385-402.doi:10.1214/06-BA115
3. Box, G. E. P. (1979). Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. In R. L. Launer & G. N. Wilkinson (Eds.), Robustness in statistics: Proceedings of a workshop (pp. 201-236). New York: Academic Press.
4. Dawid, P. (1982). The well-calibrated Bayesian. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77(379), 605-610. doi:10.2307/2287720
5. de Finetti, B. (1995). The logic of probability. Philosophical Studies, 77, 181-190. doi:10.1007/BF00996317
6. Forster, M., & Sober, E. (1994). How to tell when simpler, more unified, or less ad hoc theories will provide more accurate predictions. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 45(1), 1-35. doi:10.1093/bjps/45.1.1
7. Gelman, A., & Shalizi, C. R. (2013). Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 8-38. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02037.x
8. Goldstein, M. (2006). Subjective Bayesian analysis: Principles and practice. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 403-420. doi:10.1214/06-BA116
9. Howson, C. (2001). The logic of Bayesian probability. In D. Corfield & J. Williamson (Eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism (pp. 137-159). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10. Hughes, R. I. G. (1997). Models and representation. Philosophy of Science, 64, S325-S336. doi:10.1086/392611
11. Hutten, E. H. (1954). The rôle of models in physics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4, 284-301. doi:10.1093/bjps/IV.16.284
12. Kieseppä, I. (2001). Statistical model selection criteria and Bayesianism. Philosophy of Science (Proceedings), 68(3), S141-S152. doi:10.1086/392904
13. Mayo, D. (1996). Error and the growth of scientific knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Mayo, D., & Spanos, A. (2011). Error statistics. In P. S. Bandyopadhyay & M. R. Forster (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of science, Vol. 7: Philosophy of statistics (pp. 153-198). London: Elsevier.
15. Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2011). Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 16, 406-419. doi:10.1037/a0024377
16. Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Speckman, P. L. (2008). A statistical model for discriminating between subliminal and near-liminal performance. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 21-36. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2007.09.007
17. Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Speckman, P. L. (2009). A truncated-probit item response model for estimating psychophysical thresholds. Psychometrika, 74, 603-618. doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9122-3
18. Romeijn, J.-W. (2011). Statistics as inductive inference. In P. S. Bandyopadhyay & M. R. Forster (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of science, Vol. 7: Philosophy of statistics (pp. 751-775). London: Elsevier.
19. Romeijn, J.-W., & van de Schoot, R. (2008). A philosopher's view on Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses. In H. Hoijtink, I. Klugkist & P. Boelen (Eds.), Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses (pp. 329-357). New York: Springer.
20. Romeijn, J.-W., van de Schoot, R., & Hoijtink, H. (2012). One size does not fit all: Derivation of a prior-adapted BIC. In D. Dieks, W. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, M. Stöltzner, & M. Weber (Eds.), Probabilities, laws, and structures (Vol. 3, pp. 87-105). Dordrecht: Springer.
21. Rouder, J. N., Lu, J., Morey, R. D., Sun, D., & Speckman, P. L. (2008a). A hierarchical process dissociation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 370-389. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.370
22. Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2011). A Bayes factor meta-analysis of Bem's ESP claim. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 682-689. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0088-7
23. Rouder, J. N., Tuerlinckx, F., Speckman, P. L., Lu, J., & Gomez, P. (2008b). A hierarchical approach for fitting curves to response time measurements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1201-1208. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.6.1201
24. Savage, L. J. (1972). The foundations of statistics. (2nd ed.) New York: Dover.