Social equity and the probability of success of biodiversity conservation

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 35, Issue , 2015, Pages 299-306

  Klein, Carissa ^a   McKinnon, Madeleine C ^a,b   Wright, Becky Twohey ^c   Possingham, Hugh P ^a,d   Halpern, Benjamin S ^c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science and Oceans   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e NATIONAL CENTER FOR ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Benefits; Biodiversity; Conservation planning; Costs; Environment; Equity; Triple bottom line

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; EQUITY; PROBABILITY;

EID: 84944453841     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams V., Pressey R., Naidoo R. Opportunity costs: who really pays for conservation?. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143:439-448.
2. Adelman I., Morris C. Economic Growth & Social Equity in Developing Countries 1973, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
3. Agarwal B. Gender and forest conservation: the impact of women's participation in community forest governance. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:2785-2799.
4. Axford J.C., Hockings M.T., Carter R.W. What constitutes success in Pacific island community conserved areas?. Ecol. Soc. 2008, 13:45-61.
5. Ban N.C., Mills M., Tam J., et al. A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2013, 11:194-202.
6. Berkes F. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2004, 18:621-630.
7. Borrini, Grazia, Ashish Kothari, and Gonzalo Oviedo (2004) Indigenous and local communities and protected areas: Towards equity and enhanced conservation: Guidance on policy and practice for co-managed protected areas and community conserved areas. No. 11. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
8. Bottrill M.C., Pressey R.L. The effectiveness and evaluation of conservation planning. Conserv. Lett. 2012, 5:407-420.
9. Bottrill M., Joseph L.N., Carwardine J., Bode M., Cook C., Game E.T., Grantham H., Kark S., Linke S., McDonald-Madden E., Pressey R.L., Walker S., Wilson K.A., Possingham H.P. Is conservation triage just smart decision-making?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:649-654.
10. Brockington D. Community conservation, inequality and injustice: myths of power in protected area management. Conserv. Soc. 2004, 2(2):411-432.
11. Brown K. Innovations for conservation and development. Geogr. J. 2002, 168:6-17.
12. Campese J. Rights-Based Approaches: Exploring Issues and Opportunities for Conservation 2009, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
13. Cancino J.P., Wilen J.E., Uchida H. TURFs and ITQs: collective vs. individual decision making. University of Rhode Island. Mar. Resour. Econ. 2007, 22:391-406.
14. Claus C., Chan K., Satterfield T. The roles of people in conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 262-283.
15. De Santo E.M., Jones P.J.S., Miller A.M.M. Fortress conservation at sea: a commentary on the Chagos marine protected area. Mar. Policy 2011, 35(2):258-260.
16. Dobbs I.M. Discounting, intergenerational equity and the almost-anywhere dominance criterion. Futures 1982, 14:307-312.
17. Ferraro P.J., Hanauer M.M. Quantifying causal mechanisms to determine how protected areas affect poverty through changes in ecosystem services and infrastructure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111:4332-4337.
18. Fina M. Evolution of catch share management: lessons from catch share management in the North Pacific. Fisheries 2011, 26(4):164-177.
19. Gleason M., McCreary S., Miller-Henson M., et al. Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: a successful case study from north central California. Ocean Coastal Manage. 2010, 53:52-68.
20. Halpern B.S., Klein C.J., Brown C.J., et al. Achieving the triple bottom line in the face of inherent tradeoffs among social equity, economic return and conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013, 10.107.
21. Hatcher A., Jaffry S., Thebaud O., Bennett E. Normative andsocial influences affecting compliance with fishery regulations. Land Econ. 2000, 76:448-461.
22. Kittinger J.N., et al. A practical approach for putting people in ecosystem-based ocean planning. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2014, 12(8):448-456.
23. Klein C.J., Steinback C., Watts M.E., et al. Spatial marine zoning for fisheries and conservation. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2010, 8:349-353.
24. Macintosh A., Bonyhady T., Wilkinson D. Dealing with interests displaced by marine protected areas: a case study on the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Structural Adjustment Package. Ocean Coastal Manage. 2010, 53:581-588.
25. Martin A., Lemon M. Challenges for participatory institutions: the case of village Forest Committees in Karnataka, South India. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2001, 14:585-597.
26. Mascia M.B., Pailler S., Thieme M.L., et al. Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation. Biol. Conserv. 2014, 169:258-267.
27. McClanahan T.R., Cinner J., Kamukuru A.T. Management preferences, perceived benefits and conflicts among resource users and managers in the Mafia Island Marine Park, Tanzania. Environ. Conserv. 2008, 35:340.
28. Nightingale A.J. Participating or just sitting in? The dynamics of gender and caste in community forestry. J. For. Livelihood 2002, 2:1.
29. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. United Kingdom.
30. Parrish J.D., Braun D.P., Unnasch R.S. Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. Bioscience 2003, 53:851-860.
31. Persha L., Agrawal A., Chhatre A. Social and ecological synergy: local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation. Science 2011, 331:1606-1608.
32. Ravallion M. Income inequality in the developing world. Science 2014, 344:851-855.
33. Russ G.R., Alcala A.C. Management histories of Sumilon and Apo Marine Reserves, Philippines, and their influence on national marine resource policy. Coral Reefs 1999, 18:307-319.
34. Solar O., Irwin A. A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health 2007.
35. Land Tenure, Gender, and Globalisation: Research and Analysis from Africa, Asia, and Latin America 2010, International Development Research Centre and Zubaan, New Delhi and Ottawa. D. Tsikata, P. Golah (Eds.).
36. Webb E.L., Maliano R.J., Siar S.V. Using local user perceptions to evaluate outcomes of protected area management in the Sagay Marine Reserve, Philippines. Environ. Conserv. 2004, 31:138-148.
37. White J.W., Scholz A.J., Rassweiler A., et al. A comparison of approaches used for economic analysis in marine protected area network planning in California. Ocean Coastal Manage. 2013, 74:77-89.