A practical approach for putting people in ecosystem-based ocean planning

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 448-456

  Kittinger, John N ^a,b   Koehn, J Zachary ^a   Le Cornu, Elodie ^a,c   Ban, Natalie C ^d,e   Gopnik, Morgan ^f   Armsby, Matt ^g,h   Brooks, Cassandra ^a   Carr, Mark H ⁱ   Cinner, Joshua E ^d   Cravens, Amanda ^a   D'Iorio, Mimi ^j   Erickson, Ashley ^a   Finkbeiner, Elena M ^a   Foley, Melissa M ^a,k   Fujita, Rod ^l   Gelcich, Stefan ^m   Martin, Kevin St ⁿ   Prahler, Erin ^a   Reineman, Daniel R ^a   Shackeroff, Janna ^f   White, Crow ^o   Caldwell, Margaret R ^a,g   Crowder, Larry B ^a   more..

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science and Oceans ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PAUL VALÉRY   (France)

^d JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^f DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LABORATORY   (United States)

^g STANFORD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^h Resources Law Group   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^j NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^k U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^l ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND   (United States)

^m Avenida Vicuña Mackenna   (Chile)

ⁿ Rutgers University   (United States)

^o CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GLOBAL CHANGE; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; NATURAL RESOURCE;

EID: 84907499763     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/130267     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Alessa LN, Kliskey AA, and Brown G. 2008. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape Urban Plan 85: 27-39.
2. Ban NC and Klein CJ. 2009. Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning. Conserv Lett 2: 206-15.
3. Ban NC, Mills M, Tam J, et al. 2013. Towards a social-ecological approach for conservation planning: embedding social considerations. Front Ecol Environ 11: 194-202.
4. Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, et al. 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81: 169-93.
5. Beaumont N, Austen M, Atkins J, et al. 2007. Identification, definition, and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Mar Pollut Bull 54: 253-65.
6. Brown G and Raymond C. 2007. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Appl Geogr 27: 89-111.
7. Brown K, Adger WN, Tompkins E, et al. 2001. Tradeoff analysis for marine protected area management. Ecol Econ 37: 417-34.
8. Center for Ocean Solutions. 2011. Decision guide: selecting decision support tools for marine spatial planning. Stanford University, CA: The Woods Institute for the Environment. www.centerforoceansolutions.org/sites/default/files/pdf/cos-msp-guide.pdf. Viewed 20 Jul 2014.
9. Chan KMA, Hoshizaki L, and Klinkenberg B. 2011. Ecosystem services in conservation planning: Targeted benefits vs co-benefits or costs? PLoS ONE 6: e24378.
10. Chan KMA, Guerry A, Klain S, et al. 2012. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience 62: 744-56.
11. Charles A and Wilson L. 2009. Human dimensions of marine protected areas. ICES J Mar Sci 66: 6-15.
12. Cinner JE and David G. 2011. The human dimensions of coastal and marine ecosystems in the western Indian Ocean. Coast Manage 39: 351-57.
13. Costanza R, d'Arge R, De Groot R, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-60.
14. Dahl R, Ehler C, and Douvere F. 2009. Marine spatial planning, a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Paris, France: UNESCO. IOC Manual and Guides No 53, ICAM Dossier No 6.
15. Degnbol P and McCay BJ. 2007. Unintended and perverse consequences of ignoring linkages in fisheries systems. ICES J Mar Sci 64: 793-97.
16. Douvere F and Ehler C. 2008. The role of marine spatial planning in implementing ecosystem-based, sea use management. Mar Policy 32: 759-844.
17. Foley MM, Halpern BS, Micheli F, et al. 2010. Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 34: 955-66.
18. Friedmann J. 1987. Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Fulton EA, Smith AD, Smith DC, and van Putten IE. 2011. Human behaviour: The key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish Fish 12: 2-17.
20. Goldman RL, Tallis H, Kareiva P, and Daily GC. 2008. Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 9445-48.
21. Gopnik M, Fieseler C, Cantral L, et al. 2012. Coming to the table: early stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 36: 1139-49.
22. Greed C (Ed). 1999. Social town planning. London, UK: Routledge.
23. Green A, Smith SE, Lipsett-Moore G, et al. 2009. Designing a resilient network of marine protected areas for Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea. Oryx 43: 488-98.
24. Hall-Arber M, Pomeroy C, and Conway F. 2009. Figuring out the human dimensions of fisheries: illuminating models. Mar Coastal Fish 1: 300-14.
25. Halpern BS, Kappel CV, Selkoe KA, et al. 2009. Mapping cumulative human impacts to California Current marine ecosystems. Conserv Lett 2: 138-48.
26. Halpern BS, Longo C, Hardy D, et al. 2012. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 488: 615-20.
27. Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, et al. 2008. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319: 948-52.
28. Hobday A, Smith A, Stobutzki I, et al. 2011. Ecological risk assessment for the effects of fishing. Fish Res 108: 372-84.
29. Hoernig H, Leahy D, Zhuang ZX, et al. 2011. Planning for people: integrating social issues and processes into planning practice. Berkeley Planning J 18: 35-55.
30. Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, et al. 2011. Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31. Kittinger JN, Finkbeiner EM, Ban NC, et al. 2013. Emerging frontiers in social-ecological systems research for sustainability of small-scale fisheries. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5: 352-57.
32. Kittinger JN, Finkbeiner EM, Glazier EW, and Crowder LB. 2012. Human dimensions of coral reef social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 17: 17.
33. Klain SC and Chan K. 2012. Navigating coastal values: participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning. Ecol Econ 82: 104-13.
34. Klein CJ, Chan A, Kircher L, et al. 2008. Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas. Conserv Biol 22: 691-700.
35. Koehn JZ, Reineman DR, and Kittinger JN. 2013. Progress and promise in spatial human dimensions research for eco system based ocean planning. Mar Policy 42: 31-38.
36. Lafranchi C and Daugherty C. 2011. Non-consumptive ocean recreation in Oregon: human uses, economic impacts & spatial data. Natural Equity, Surfrider Foundation, and EcoTrust. www.surfrider.org/images/uploads/publications/OR-rec-study.pdf. Viewed 20 Jul 2014.
37. Le Cornu E, Kittinger JN, Koehn JZ, et al. 2014. Current practice and future prospects for social data in coastal and ocean planning. Conserv Biol 28: 902-11.
38. Lester SE, Costello C, Halpern BS, et al. 2013. Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 38: 80-89.
39. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
40. Margules CR and Pressey RL. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243-53.
41. Merrifield M, McClintock W, Burt C, et al. 2013. MarineMap: A web-based platform for collaborative marine protected area planning. Ocean Coast Manage 74: 67-76.
42. Okey TA and Loucks LA. 2011. Social-ecological assessment for the marine and coastal areas of the west coast of Vancouver Island. Port Alberni, Canada: West Coast Aquatic. http://westcoastaquatic.ca/library. Viewed 20 Jul 2014.
43. Pasquini L, Twyman C, and Wainwright J. 2010. Toward a conceptual framework for blending social and biophysical attributes in conservation planning: A case-study of privately-conserved lands. Environ Manage 46: 659-70.
44. Pickett STA, Cadenasso M, Grove J, et al. 2001. Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32: 127-57.
45. Pollnac R, Christie P, Cinner JE, et al. 2010. Marine reserves as linked social-ecological systems. P Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 18262-65.
46. Pressey RL and Bottrill MC. 2009. Approaches to landscape- And seascape-scale conservation planning: convergence, contrasts, and challenges. Oryx 43: 464-75.
47. Pressey RL, Cabeza M, Watts ME, et al. 2007. Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 583-92.
48. Raymond CM, Bryan BA, MacDonald DH, et al. 2009. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68: 1301-15.
49. Reed MS. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biol Conserv 141: 2417-31.
50. Reyers B, Roux DJ, Cowling RM, et al. 2010. Conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process. Conserv Biol 24: 957-65.
51. Richardson EA, Kaiser MJ, Edwards-Jones G, and Possingham HP. 2006. Sensitivity of marine-reserve design to the spatial resolution of socioeconomic data. Conserv Biol 20: 1191-202.
52. Ruckelshaus M, McKenzie E, Tallis H, et al. Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol Econ; doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon. 2013.07.009. In press.
53. Ruiz-Frau A, Edwards-Jones G, and Kaiser MJ. 2011. Mapping stakeholder values for coastal zone management. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 434: 239-49.
54. Scholz AJ, Steinback C, Kruse SA, et al. 2010. Incorporation of spatial and economic analyses of human-use data in the design of marine protected areas. Conserv Biol 25: 485-92.
55. Selkoe KA, Halpern BS, and Toonen RJ. 2008. Evaluating anthropogenic threats to the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Aquat Conserv 18: 1149-65.
56. St Martin K and Hall-Arber M. 2008. The missing layer: geo-technologies, communities, and implications for marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 32: 779-86.
57. Stephenson SL and Mascia MB. 2009. Putting people on the map: An approach to integrating social data in conservation planning. Washington, DC: Society for Conservation Biology, Social Science Working Group. SSWG Working Paper 1.
58. Tallis H, Goldman R, Uhl M, and Brosi B. 2009. Integrating conservation and development in the field: implementing ecosystem service projects. Front Ecol Environ 7: 12-20.
59. White C, Halpern BS, and Kappel CV. 2012. Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 4696-701.
60. Wiggin J, Uiterwyk K, Bliven S, et al. 2009. Compatibility determination: considerations for siting coastal and ocean uses (DRAFT). Urban Harbors Institute Publications. Paper 6. http://scholarworks.umb.edu/uhi-pubs/6. Viewed 20 Jul 2014.
61. Yli-Pelkonen V and Niemelä J. 2005. Linking ecological and social systems in cities: urban planning in Finland as a case. Biodivers Conserv 14: 1947-67.