Computational field shaping for deep brain stimulation with thousands of contacts in a novel electrode geometry

Neuromodulation

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 542-550

  Willsie, Andrew C ^a   Dorval, Alan D ^a  

^a University of Utah   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational modeling; current steering; deep brain stimulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ELECTRODE; ELECTRODE IMPLANTATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NEUROLOGICAL THERAPEUTIC DEVICE; REPRODUCIBILITY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICES; IMPEDANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRODES; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 84944442051     PISSN: 10947159     EISSN: 15251403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12330     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Okun MS, Foote KD,. Parkinson's disease DBS: what, when, who and why? The time has come to tailor DBS targets. Expert Rev Neurother 2010; 10: 1847-1857.
2. Butson CR, Cooper SE, Henderson JM, Wolgamuth B, McIntyre CC,. Probabilistic analysis of activation volumes generated during deep brain stimulation. Neuroimage 2011; 54: 2096-2104.
3. Tommasi G, Krack P, Fraix V, et al. Pyramidal tract side effects induced by deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 813-819.
4. Siddiqui MS, ul Haq I, Okun MS,. Deep brain stimulation in movement disorders. Continuum. (Minneap Minn) 2010; 16: 110-130.
5. Volkmann J, Herzog J, Kopper F, Deuschl G,. Introduction to the programming of deep brain stimulators. Mov Disord 2002; 17 (Suppl. 3): S181-S187.
6. Kuncel AM, Grill WM,. Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 2431-2441.
7. Richardson RM, Ostrem JL, Starr PA,. Surgical repositioning of misplaced subthalamic electrodes in Parkinson's disease: location of effective and ineffective leads. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2009; 87: 297-303.
8. Keane M, Deyo S, Abosch A, Bajwa JA, Johnson MD,. Improved spatial targeting with directionally segmented deep brain stimulation leads for treating essential tremor. J Neural Eng 2012; 9: 046005.
9. Buhlmann J, Hofmann L, Tass PA, Hauptmann C,. Modeling of a segmented electrode for desynchronizing deep brain stimulation. Front Neuroeng 2011; 4: 15.
10. Holl EM, Petersen EA, Foltynie T, et al. Improving targeting in image-guided frame-based deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (2 Suppl. Operative): 437-447.
11. Sharma M, Rhiew R, Deogaonkar M, Rezai A, Boulis N,. Accuracy and precision of targeting using frameless stereotactic system in deep brain stimulator implantation surgery. Neurol India 2014; 62: 503-509.
12. Mirzadeh Z, Chapple K, Lambert M, Dhall R, Ponce FA,. Validation of CT-MRI fusion for intraoperative assessment of stereotactic accuracy in DBS surgery. Mov Disord 2014; 29: 1788-1795.
13. Jonker PKC, van Dijk JMC, van Hulzen ALJ, van Laar T, Staal MJ, Journée HL,. The added value of semimicroelectrode recording in deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson disease. Neurosurg Focus 2013; 35: E3.
14. Mädler B, Coenen VA,. Explaining clinical effects of deep brain stimulation through simplified target-specific modeling of the volume of activated tissue. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 1072-1080.
15. Timmermann L, Jain R, Brücke T, et al. VANTAGE trial: a prospective, multi-center trial evaluating deep brain stimulation with a new multiple-source, constant-current rechargeable system in Parkinson's disease (P1.173). Neurology 2015; 84.
16. Contarino MF, Bour LJ, Verhagen R, et al. Directional steering: a novel approach to deep brain stimulation. Neurology 2014; 83: 1163-1169.
17. Pollo C, Kaelin-Lang A, Oertel MF, et al. Directional deep brain stimulation: an intraoperative double-blind pilot study. Brain 2014; 137: 2015-2026.
18. Hamel W, Schrader B, Weinert D, et al. Technical complication in deep brain stimulation. Zentralbl Neurochir 2002; 63: 124-127.
19. Fernández FS, Alvarez Vega MA, Antuña Ramos A, Fernández González F, Lozano Aragoneses B,. Lead fractures in deep brain stimulation during long-term follow-up. Parkinsons Dis. 2010; 2010: 409356.
20. Butson CR, Cooper SE, Henderson JM, McIntyre CC,. Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation. Neuroimage 2007; 34: 661-670.
21. Butson CR, McIntyre CC,. Current steering to control the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2008; 1: 7-15.
22. McClelland S, Ford B, Senatus PB, et al. Subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson disease: determination of electrode location necessary for clinical efficacy. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19: E12.
23. Morishita T, Fayad SM, Higuchi M, Nestor KA, Foote KD,. Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: systematic review of clinical outcomes. Neurother 2014; 11: 475-484.
24. Mathai A, Wichmann T, Smith Y,. More than meets the eye-myelinated axons crowd the subthalamic nucleus. Mov Disord 2013; 28: 1811-1815.
25. Johnson MD, McIntyre CC,. Quantifying the neural elements activated and inhibited by globus pallidus deep brain stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2008; 100: 2549-2563.
26. Hamel W, Fietzek U, Morsnowski A, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: evaluation of active electrode contacts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 1036-1046.
27. Cavuoto J,. Neurotech Business Report: "Depressing Innovation" 2013. http://www.neurotechreports.com/pages/publishersletterDec13.html
28. Duriez C, Guébert C, Marchal M, Cotin S, Grisoni L,. Interactive simulation of flexible needle insertions based on constraint models. In:, Yang G-Z, Hawkes D, Rueckert D, Noble A, Taylor C, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2009. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 291-299.
29. Schlaier JR, Habermeyer C, Janzen A, et al. The influence of intraoperative microelectrode recordings and clinical testing on the location of final stimulation sites in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155: 357-366.
30. Bour LJ, Contarino MF, Foncke EMJ, et al. Long-term experience with intraoperative microrecording during DBS neurosurgery in STN and GPi. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152: 2069-2077.
31. Burdick AP, Foote KD, Wu S, et al. Do patient's get angrier following STN, GPi, and thalamic deep brain stimulation. Neuroimage 2011; 54 (Suppl. 1): S227-S232.
32. Welter M-L, Schüpbach M, Czernecki V, et al. Optimal target localization for subthalamic stimulation in patients with Parkinson disease. Neurology 2014; 82: 1352-1361.
33. Ivan ME, Yarlagadda J, Saxena AP, et al. Brain shift during bur hole-based procedures using interventional MRI. J Neurosurg 2014; 121: 149-160.
34. Sillay KA, Kumbier LM, Ross C, et al. Perioperative brain shift and deep brain stimulating electrode deformation analysis: implications for rigid and non-rigid devices. Ann Biomed Eng 2013; 41: 293-304.
35. Ellis T-M, Foote KD, Fernandez HH, et al. Reoperation for suboptimal outcomes after deep brain stimulation surgery. Neurosurgery 2008; 63: 754-760.
36. Fomani AA, Moradi M, Assaf S, Mansour RR,. 3D microprobes for deep brain stimulation and recording. In: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2010:1808-1811.
37. Rattay F,. Analysis of the electrical excitation of CNS neurons. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998; 45: 766-772.
38. Lujan JL, Chaturvedi A, Choi KS, et al. Tractography-activation models applied to subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2013; 6: 737-739.
39. Chaturvedi A, Butson CR, Lempka SF, Cooper SE, McIntyre CC,. Patient-specific models of deep brain stimulation: influence of field model complexity on neural activation predictions. Brain Stimul. 2010; 3: 65-67.
40. Biran R, Martin DC, Tresco PA,. Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays. Exp Neurol 2005; 195: 115-126.
41. Martens HCF, Toader E, Decré MMJ, et al. Spatial steering of deep brain stimulation volumes using a novel lead design. Clin Neurophysiol 2011; 122: 558-566.
42. Laotaveerungrueng N, Lin C-H, McCallum G, et al. 3-D microfabricated electrodes for targeted deep brain stimulation. In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. EMBC 2009, 2009:6493-6496.
43. Ward MP, Rajdev P, Ellison C, Irazoqui PP,. Toward a comparison of microelectrodes for acute and chronic recordings. Brain Res 2009; 1282: 183-200.
44. Tooker A, Madsen TE, Yorita A, et al. Microfabricated polymer-based neural interface for electrical stimulation/recording, drug delivery, and chemical sensing-development. In: 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013: 5159-5162.
45. Shen J, Assaf S, Jog M, "Non-planar multi-channel electrode array," US20070197892 A1, 2007.
46. Golestanirad L, Elahi B, Molina A, et al. Analysis of fractal electrodes for efficient neural stimulation. Front Neuroengineering 2013; 6.
47. Bronstein JM, Tagliati M, McIntyre C, et al. The rationale driving the evolution of deep brain stimulation to constant-current devices. Neuromodulation 2015; 18: 85-89.
48. Rattay F,. Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1986; 33: 974-977.
49. Ramirez de Noriega F, Eitan R, Marmor O, et al. Constant current versus constant voltage subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2015; 93: 114-121.
50. McCreery DB, Agnew WF, Yuen TG, Bullara L,. Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990; 37: 996-1001.
51. Axer H, Keyserlingk DG,. Mapping of fiber orientation in human internal capsule by means of polarized light and confocal scanning laser microscopy. J Neurosci Methods 2000; 94: 165-175.
52. Hosain MK, Kouzani A, Tye S,. Closed loop deep brain stimulation: an evolving technology. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2014; 37: 619-634.