Constant current versus constant voltage subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in parkinson's disease

Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 114-121

  Ramirez De Noriega, Fernando ^a   Eitan, Renana ^a   Marmor, Odeya ^b   Lavi, Adi ^a   Linetzky, Eduard ^a   Bergman, Hagai ^b   Israel, Zvi ^a  

^a HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Current; Parkinson's disease; Subthalamic stimulation; Voltage

Indexed keywords

LEVODOPA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CEREBELLAR STIMULATOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DEPRESSION; DEPRESSION ASSESSMENT; DETERIORATION; DEVICE COMPARISON; DEVICE SAFETY; DISEASE DURATION; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; EMOTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAMILTON DEPRESSION RATING SCALE; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; MALE; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; PARKINSON DISEASE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUICK INVENTORY OF DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMATOLOGY SELF REPORT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; UNIFIED PARKINSON DISEASE RATING SCALE;

EID: 84924092514     PISSN: 10116125     EISSN: 14230372     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000368443     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Deuschl G, et al: A randomized trial of deepbrain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 896-908.
2. Weaver FM, et al: Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009; 301: 63-73.
3. Deuschl G, Agid Y: Subthalamic neurostimulation for Parkinson's disease with early fluctuations: balancing the risks and benefits. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 1025-1034.
4. Ngoga D, et al: Deep brain stimulation improves survival in severe Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85: 17-22.
5. Coubes P, et al: Electrical stimulation of the globus pallidus internus in patients with primary generalized dystonia: long-term results. J Neurosurg 2004; 101: 189-194.
6. Montgomery JEB: Deep Brain Stimulation Programming: Principles and Practice. New York, Oxford University Press, 2010.
7. Lungu C, et al: Temporal macrodynamics and microdynamics of the postoperative impedance at the tissue-electrode interface in deep brain stimulation patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85: 816-819.
8. Cheung T, et al: Longitudinal impedance variability in patients with chronically implanted DBS devices. Brain Stimul 2013; 6: 746-751.
9. Miocinovic S, et al: Experimental and theoretical characterization of the voltage distribution generated by deep brain stimulation. Exp Neurol 2009; 216: 166-176.
10. Butson CR, McIntyre CC: Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 116: 2490-2500.
11. Grill WM: Principles of electric field generation for stimulation of the ventral nervous system; in Krames ES, Peckham PH, Rezai AR (eds): Neuromodulation. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2009, pp 152-153.
12. Okun MS, et al: Subthalamic deep brain stimulation with a constant-current device in Parkinson's disease: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 140-149.
13. McMullen D, et al: Current based DBS in STN for PD achieves asymptotic impedance levels earlier than voltage based DBS. American Association of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery Biennial Meeting, San Francisco, 2012.
14. Sillay KA, et al: Long-term measurement of impedance in chronically implanted depth and subdural electrodes during responsive neurostimulation in humans. Brain Stimul 2013; 6: 718-726.
15. Satzer D, et al: Variation in deep brain stimulation electrode impedance over years following electrode implantation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2014; 92: 94-102.
16. Israel Z, Hassin-Baer S: Subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Isr Med Assoc J 2005; 7: 458-463.
17. Hamilton M: A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23: 56-62.
18. Hamilton M: Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967; 6: 278-296.
19. Beck AT, et al: Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories IA and II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess 1996; 67: 588-597.
20. Rush AJ, et al: The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDSSR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54: 573-583.
21. Peto V, et al: The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and wellbeing for individuals with Parkinson's disease. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 241-248.
22. Endicott J, et al: Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure. Psychopharmacol Bull 1993; 29: 321-326.
23. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: 'Minimental state'. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-198.
24. Belin P, Fillion-Bilodeau S, Gosselin F: The Montreal Affective Voices: a validated set of nonverbal affect bursts for research on auditory affective processing. Behav Res Methods 2008; 40: 531-539.
25. Eitan R, et al: Asymmetric right/left encoding of emotions in the human subthalamic nucleus. Front Syst Neurosci 2013; 7: 69.
26. Hauser RA, Deckers F, Lehert P: Parkinson's disease home diary: further validation and implications for clinical trials. Mov Disord 2004; 19: 1409-1413.
27. Zaidel A, et al: Levodopa and subthalamic deep brain stimulation responses are not congruent. Mov Disord 2010; 25: 2379-2386.
28. Lempka SF, et al: Current-controlled deep brain stimulation reduces in vivo voltage fluctuations observed during voltage-controlled stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 2128-2133.
29. Steinke GK, et al: Acute impedance changes of DBS system and corresponding stimulation estimates. Movement Disorders 2012; 27:S86-S86.
30. Lempka SF, et al: In vivo impedance spectroscopy of deep brain stimulation electrodes. J Neural Eng 2009; 6: 046001.
31. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT: Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 2008; 20: 86-100.
32. Bronstein JM, et al: The rationale driving the evolution of deep brain stimulation to constant-current devices. Neuromodulation 2014; in press.
33. Foutz TJ, et al: Energy efficient neural stimulation: coupling circuit design and membrane biophysics. PLoS One 2012; 7:e51901.
34. Foutz TJ, McIntyre CC: Evaluation of novel stimulus waveforms for deep brain stimulation. J Neural Eng 2010; 7: 066008.