Effect of high salinity on the performance of forward osmosis: Water flux, membrane scaling and removal efficiency

Desalination

Volumn 378, Issue , 2016, Pages 67-73

  Zhao, Pin ^a   Gao, Baoyu ^a   Yue, Qinyan ^a   Liu, Sicheng ^a   Shon, Ho Kyong ^b  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Forward osmosis; High salinity feed water; Membrane scaling; Ni (II) removal efficiency; Water flux

Indexed keywords

BOILERS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FLOW VELOCITY; MEMBRANES; NICKEL; OSMOSIS; WATER;

FEED WATER; FORWARD OSMOSIS; MEMBRANE ORIENTATION; MEMBRANE SCALING; OPTIMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS; REJECTION EFFICIENCY; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; WATER FLUX;

WATER TREATMENT;

MEMBRANE; NICKEL; OSMOSIS; SALINITY;

EID: 84944072821     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.09.028     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Greenlee L.F., Lawler D.F., Freeman B.D., Marrot B., Moulin P. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. Water Res. 2009, 43:2317-2348.
2. Dialynas E., Mantzavinos D., Diamadopoulos E. Advanced treatment of the reverse osmosis concentrate produced during reclamation of municipal wastewater. Water Res. 2008, 42:4603-4608.
3. Malamis S., Katsou E., Takopoulos K., Demetriou P., Loizidou M. Assessment of metal removal, biomass activity and RO concentrate treatment in an MBR-RO system. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 209-210:1-8.
4. Greenlee L.F., Testa F., Lawler D.F., Freeman B.D., Moulin P. The effect of antiscalant addition on calcium carbonate precipitation for a simplified synthetic brackish water reverse osmosis concentrate. Water Res. 2010, 44:2957-2969.
5. Tran A.T.K., Zhang Y., Jullok N., Meesschaert B., Pinoy L., Van der Bruggen B. RO concentrate treatment by a hybrid system consisting of a pellet reactor and electrodialysis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 79:228-238.
6. Greenlee L.F., Testa F., Lawler D.F., Freeman B.D., Moulin P. Effect of antiscalant degradation on salt precipitation and solid/liquid separation of RO concentrate. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 366:48-61.
7. Zhou T., Lim T.-T., Chin S.-S., Fane A.G. Treatment of organics in reverse osmosis concentrate from a municipal wastewater reclamation plant: feasibility test of advanced oxidation processes with/without pretreatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 166:932-939.
8. Zhang Y., Ghyselbrecht K., Meesschaert B., Pinoy L., Van der Bruggen B. Electrodialysis on RO concentrate to improve water recovery in wastewater reclamation. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 378:101-110.
9. Chung T.-S., Li X., Ong R.C., Ge Q., Wang H., Han G. Emerging forward osmosis (FO) technologies and challenges ahead for clean water and clean energy applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2012, 1:246-257.
10. Su J., Chung T.-S., Helmer B.J., de Wit J.S. Enhanced double-skinned FO membranes with inner dense layer for wastewater treatment and macromolecule recycle using sucrose as draw solute. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 396:92-100.
11. Valladares Linares R., Li Z., Sarp S., Bucs S.S., Amy G., Vrouwenvelder J.S. Forward osmosis niches in seawater desalination and wastewater reuse. Water Res. 2014, 66:122-139.
12. Liu Y., Mi B. Combined fouling of forward osmosis membranes: synergistic foulant interaction and direct observation of fouling layer formation. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 407-408:136-144.
13. Wang Y., Wicaksana F., Tang C.Y., Fane A.G. Direct microscopic observation of forward osmosis membrane fouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:7102-7109.
14. Zhao P., Yue Q., Gao B., Kong J., Rong H., Liu P., Shon H.K., Li Q. Influence of different ion types and membrane orientations on the forward osmosis performance. Desalination 2014, 344:123-128.
15. Zhao P., Gao B., Xu S., Kong J., Ma D., Shon H.K., Yue Q., Liu P. Polyelectrolyte-promoted forward osmosis process for dye wastewater treatment - exploring the feasibility of using polyacrylamide as draw solute. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 264:32-38.
16. Chanukya B., Patil S., Rastogi N.K. Influence of concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis during desalination using ammonium bicarbonate. Desalination 2013, 312:39-44.
17. Tan C.H., Ng H.Y. Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 324:209-219.
18. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:237-247.
19. Tang C.Y., She Q., Lay W.C., Wang R., Fane A.G. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 354:123-133.
20. Phuntsho S., Vigneswaran S., Kandasamy J., Hong S., Lee S., Shon H.K. Influence of temperature and temperature difference in the performance of forward osmosis desalination process. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415-416:734-744.
21. Ge Q., Ling M., Chung T.-S. Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: developments, challenges, and prospects for the future. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 442:225-237.
22. Xie M., Price W.E., Nghiem L.D., Elimelech M. Effects of feed and draw solution temperature and transmembrane temperature difference on the rejection of trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 438:57-64.
23. Gray G.T., McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation. Desalination 2006, 197:1-8.
24. Tan C.H., Ng H.Y. Revised external and internal concentration polarization models to improve flux prediction in forward osmosis process. Desalination 2013, 309:125-140.
25. Xie M., Nghiem L.D., Price W.E., Elimelech M. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis. Water Res. 2012, 46:2683-2692.