Polyelectrolyte-promoted forward osmosis process for dye wastewater treatment - Exploring the feasibility of using polyacrylamide as draw solute

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 264, Issue , 2015, Pages 32-38

  Zhao, Pin ^a   Gao, Baoyu ^a   Xu, Shiping ^a   Kong, Jiaojiao ^a   Ma, Defang ^a   Shon, Ho Kyong ^b   Yue, Qinyan ^a   Liu, Pan ^a  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Dye wastewater treatment; Forward osmosis; Polyacrylamide; Reverse salt flux; Water flux

Indexed keywords

DIES; MEMBRANE FOULING; OIL FIELDS; OSMOSIS; POLYACRYLATES; POLYELECTROLYTES;

DYE WASTEWATER TREATMENTS; FORWARD OSMOSIS; HIGH VISCOSITIES; MEMBRANE ORIENTATION; POLYMER FLOODING; SALT FLUX; SALT REJECTIONS; WATER FLUX;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

EID: 84913587585     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.064     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Elimelech M., Phillip W.A. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 2011, 333:712-717.
2. Zhao S., Zou L., Tang C.Y., Mulcahy D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 396:1-21.
3. Hoover L.A., Phillip W.A., Tiraferri A., Yip N.Y., Elimelech M. Forward with osmosis: emerging applications for greater sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:9824-9830.
4. Lee S., Boo C., Elimelech M., Hong S. Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 365:34-39.
5. Ng H.Y., Tang W., Wong W.S. Performance of forward (direct) osmosis process: membrane structure and transport phenomenon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 2408-2413.
6. Mi B., Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320:292-302.
7. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Childress A.E. Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 364:233-241.
8. Boo C., Lee S., Elimelech M., Meng Z., Hong S. Colloidal fouling in forward osmosis: role of reverse salt diffusion. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 390:277-284.
9. Cornelissen E., Harmsen D., De Korte K., Ruiken C., Qin J.-J., Oo H., Wessels L. Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 319:158-168.
10. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:237-247.
11. Chekli L., Phuntsho S., Shon H.K., Vigneswaran S., Kandasamy J., Chanan A. A review of draw solutes in forward osmosis process and their use in modern applications. Desalin. Water Treat. 2012, 43:167-184.
12. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:114-123.
13. Ling M.M., Wang K.Y., Chung T.-S. Highly water-soluble magnetic nanoparticles as novel draw solutes in forward osmosis for water reuse. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49:5869-5876.
14. Ge Q., Wang P., Wan C., Chung T.-S. Polyelectrolyte-promoted forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD) hybrid process for dye wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:6236-6243.
15. Li D., Zhang X., Yao J., Zeng Y., Simon G.P., Wang H. Composite polymer hydrogels as draw agents in forward osmosis and solar dewatering. Soft Matter 2011, 7:10048-10056.
16. Phuntsho S., Shon H.K., Hong S., Lee S., Vigneswaran S. A novel low energy fertilizer driven forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation: evaluating the performance of fertilizer draw solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375:172-181.
17. Yip N.Y., Tiraferri A., Phillip W.A., Schiffman J.D., Elimelech M. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:3812-3818.
18. Widjojo N., Chung T.-S., Weber M., Maletzko C., Warzelhan V. The role of sulphonated polymer and macrovoid-free structure in the support layer for thin-film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 383:214-223.
19. Widjojo N., Chung T.-S., Weber M., Maletzko C., Warzelhan V. A sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone (sPPSU) as the supporting substrate in thin film composite (TFC) membranes with enhanced performance for forward osmosis (FO). Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 220:15-23.
20. Fam W., Phuntsho S., Lee J.H., Shon H.K. Performance comparison of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51:6274-6280.
21. Jin X., She Q., Ang X., Tang C.Y. Removal of boron and arsenic by forward osmosis membrane: influence of membrane orientation and organic fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 389:182-187.
22. Lee K., Baker R., Lonsdale H. Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 1981, 8:141-171.
23. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination 2005, 174:1-11.
24. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:114-123.
25. Chanukya B., Patil S., Rastogi N.K. Influence of concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis during desalination using ammonium bicarbonate. Desalination 2013, 312:39-44.
26. Tang C.Y., She Q., Lay W.C.L., Wang R., Fane A.G. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 354:123-133.
27. Parida V., Ng H.Y. Forward osmosis organic fouling: effects of organic loading, calcium and membrane orientation. Desalination 2013, 312:88-98.