Influence of different ion types and membrane orientations on the forward osmosis performance

Desalination

Volumn 344, Issue , 2014, Pages 123-128

  Zhao, Pin ^a   Yue, Qinyan ^a   Gao, Baoyu ^a   Kong, Jiaojiao ^a   Rong, Hongyan ^a   Liu, Pan ^a   Shon, Ho Kyong ^b   Li, Qian ^a  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Different ion types; Draw solution; Forward osmosis; Membrane orientation; Water flux

Indexed keywords

NEGATIVE IONS; POSITIVE IONS; SALTS;

DRAW SOLUTIONS; FORWARD OSMOSIS; ION TYPES; MEMBRANE ORIENTATION; WATER FLUX;

OSMOSIS;

DESALINATION; ION; MEMBRANE; OSMOSIS;

EID: 84897554072     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.018     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Cath T.Y., Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:70-87.
2. Ng H.Y., Tang W., Wong W.S. Performance of forward (direct) osmosis process: membrane structure and transport phenomenon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:2408-2413.
3. Hoover L.A., Phillip W.A., Tiraferri A., Yip N.Y., Elimelech M. Forward with osmosis: emerging applications for greater sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:9824-9830.
4. Zhao S., Zou L., Tang C.Y., Mulcahy D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 396:1-21.
5. Elimelech M., Phillip W.A. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 2011, 333:712-717.
6. Phuntsho S., Vigneswaran S., Kandasamy J., Hong S., Lee S., Shon H.K. Influence of temperature and temperature difference in the performance of forward osmosis desalination process. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415:734-744.
7. Lee S., Boo C., Elimelech M., Hong S. Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 365:34-39.
8. Widjojo N., Chung T.-S., Weber M., Maletzko C., Warzelhan V. The role of sulphonated polymer and macrovoid-free structure in the support layer for thin-film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 383:214-223.
9. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 318:458-466.
10. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Childress A.E. Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 364:233-241.
11. Kim S., Ozaki H., Kim J. Effect of pH on the rejection of inorganic salts and organic compound using nanofiltration membrane. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2006, 23:28-33.
12. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination 2005, 174:1-11.
13. McGinnis R.L., McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide osmotic heat engine for power generation. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 305:13-19.
14. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:114-123.
15. 2O system. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1998, 43:201-204.
16. Phuntsho S., Shon H.K., Majeed T., El Saliby I., Vigneswaran S., Kandasamy J., Hong S., Lee S. Blended fertilizers as draw solutions for fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis desalination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:4567-4575.
17. Phuntsho S., Shon H.K., Hong S., Lee S., Vigneswaran S., Kandasamy J. Fertiliser drawn forward osmosis desalination: the concept, performance and limitations for fertigation. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2012, 11:147-168.
18. Phuntsho S., Shon H.K., Hong S., Lee S., Vigneswaran S. A novel low energy fertilizer driven forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation: evaluating the performance of fertilizer draw solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375:172-181.
19. Fam W., Phuntsho S., Lee J.H., Shon H.K. Performance comparison of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51:6274-6280.
20. Jin X., She Q., Ang X., Tang C.Y. Removal of boron and arsenic by forward osmosis membrane: influence of membrane orientation and organic fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 389:182-187.
21. Lee K.L., Baker R.W., Lonsdale H.K. Membranes for power-generation by pressure-retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 1981, 8:141-171.
22. Chanukya B., Patil S., Rastogi N.K. Influence of concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis during desalination using ammonium bicarbonate. Desalination 2013, 312:39-44.
23. Tan C.H., Ng H.Y. Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 324:209-219.
24. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:237-247.
25. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Modelling water flux in forward osmosis: implications for improved membrane design. AlChE 2007, 53(7):1736-1744.
26. Tang C.Y., She Q., Lay W.C., Wang R., Fane A.G. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 354:123-133.
27. Zhao S., Zou L. Effects of working temperature on separation performance, membrane scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis desalination. Desalination 2011, 278:157-164.
28. Phillip W.A., Yong J.S., Elimelech M. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:5170-5176.
29. Wishaw B., Stokes R. The diffusion coefficients and conductances of some concentrated electrolyte solutions at 25. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76:2065-2071.
30. Boo C., Lee S., Elimelech M., Meng Z., Hong S. Colloidal fouling in forward osmosis: role of reverse salt diffusion. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 390:277-284.
31. Hancock N.T., Cath T.Y. Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:6769-6775.