The media frames corpus: Annotations of frames across issues

ACL-IJCNLP 2015 - 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2015, Pages 438-444

  Card, Dallas ^a   Boydstun, Amber E ^b   Gross, Justin H ^c   Resnik, Philip ^d   Smith, Noah A ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LINGUISTICS;

NEWS ARTICLES; POLICY ISSUES;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84944066237     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p15-2072     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Amr Ahmed and Eric P. Xing. 2010. Staying in-formed: Supervised and semi-supervised multi-view topical analysis of ideological perspective. In Proc. of EMNLP
2. Ron Artstein and Massimo Poesio. 2008. Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computa-tional Linguistics, 34(4):555-596
3. Eric Baumer, Elisha Elovic, Ying Qin, Francesca Polletta, and Geri Gay. 2015. Testing and comparing computational approaches for identifying the lan-guage of framing in political news. In Proc. of NAACL
4. Frank R. Baumgartner, Suzanna L. De Boef, and Amber E. Boydstun. 2008. The decline of the death penalty and the discovery of innocence. Cambridge University Press
5. Robert D. Benford and David A. Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26:611-639
6. Adam J. Berinsky and Donald R. Kinder. 2006. Mak-ing sense of issues through media frames: Under-standing the Kosovo crisis. Journal of Politics, 68(3):640-656
7. Amber E. Boydstun, Dallas Card, Justin H. Gross, Philip Resnik, and Noah A. Smith. 2014. Tracking the development of media frames within and across policy issues. APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper
8. Eunsol Choi, Chenhao Tan, Lillian Lee, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Jennifer Spindel. 2012. Hedge detection as a lens on framing in the GMO debates: A position paper. In Proc of. ACL Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Mean-ing in Computational Linguistics, pages 70-79
9. Dennis Chong and James N. Druckman. 2007. Fram-ing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1): 103-126
10. Robert M. Entman. 1993. Framing: Toward clarifica-tion of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communi-cation, 43(4):51-58
11. William A. Gameson and Andre Modigliani. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Jour-nal of Sociology, 95(1): 1-37
12. Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse M. Shapiro. 2010. What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily news-papers. Econometrica, 78(1):35-71
13. Eric Hardisty, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, and Philip Resnik. 2010. Modeling perspective using adaptor grammars. In Proc. of EMNLP
14. Kazi Saidul Hasan and Vincent Ng. 2013. Stance clas-sification of ideological debates: Data, models, features, and constraints. In Proc. ofUCNLP
15. Mohit Iyyer, Peter Enns, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, and Philip Resnik. 2014. Political ideology detection using recursive neural networks. In Proc. of ACL
16. Beata Beigman Klebanov, Eyal Beigman, and Daniel Diermeier. 2010. Vocabulary choice as an indicator of perspective. In Proc. of ACL
17. Klaus Krippendorff. 2004. Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality and Quantity, 38(6):787-800
18. Klaus Krippendorff. 2012. Content Analysis: An In-troduction to its Methodology. SAGE Publications
19. Jure Leskovec, Lars Backstrom, and Jon Kleinberg. 2009. Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In Proc. ofKDD
20. Wei-Hao Lin, Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Alexander Hauptmann. 2006. Which side are you on? Identifying perspectives at the document and sentence levels. In Proc. ofCoNNL
21. Viet-An Nguyen, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Philip Resnik, and Kristina Miler. 2015. Tea party in the house: A hierarchical ideal point topic model and its applica-tion to Republican legislators in the 112th congress. In Proc. of ACL
22. Zhongdang Pan and Gerald M. Kosicki. 1993. Fram-ing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Polit-ical communication, 10(1):55-75
23. Rebecca J. Passonneau and Bob Carpenter. 2014. The benefits of a model of annotation. In Proc. of ACL
24. Stephen D. Rees, Oscar H. Gandy Jr., and August E. Grant, editors. 2001. Framing public life: Perspec-tives on media and our understanding of the social world. Routledge
25. Yanchuan Sim, Brice D. L. Acree, Justin H. Gross, and Noah A. Smith. 2013. Measuring ideological pro-portions in political speeches. In Proc. of EMNLP
26. David A. Smith, Ryan Cordell, and Elizabeth Maddock Dillon. 2013. Infectious texts: modeling text reuse in nineteenth-century newspapers. In IEEE Interna-tional Conference on Big Data
27. David A. Smith, Ryan Cordel, Elizabeth Maddock Dillon, Nick Stramp, and John Wilkerson. 2014. De-tecting and modeling local text reuse. In IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
28. Nayda Terkildsen and Frauke Schnell. 1997. How me-dia frames move public opinion: An analysis of the women's movement. Political research quarterly, 50(4):879-900
29. Oren Tsur, Dan Calacci, and David Lazer. 2015. Frame of mind: Using statistical models for detec-tion of framing and agenda setting campaigns. In Proc. of ACL
30. Marilyn A. Walker, Pranav Anand, Robert Abbott, and Ricky Grant. 2012. Stance classification using dia-logic properties of persuasion. In Proc. of NAACL
31. Janyce Wiebe, Theresa Wilson, Rebecca Bruce, Matthew Bell, and Melanie Martin. 2004. Learn-ing subjective language. Computational Linguistics, 30(3):277-308