A language-independent feature schema for inflectional morphology

ACL-IJCNLP 2015 - 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2015, Pages 674-680

  Sylak Glassman, John ^a   Kirov, Christo ^a   Yarowsky, David ^b   Que, Roger ^b  

^a Center for Language and Speech Processing   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; CONFORMAL MAPPING; MORPHOLOGY; LINGUISTICS;

FEATURE MAPPING; LANGUAGE INDEPENDENTS; MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYZER; MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES; PARADIGM LEARNING; PARSING ALGORITHM;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84944050302     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p15-2111     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. D. N. Shankara Bhat. 2004. Pronouns. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Balthasar Bickel and Johanna Nichols. 2005. Inclusive-exclusive as person vs. number categories worldwide. In Elena Filimonova, editor, Clusivity, pages 49-72. John Benjamins, Philadelphia.
4. Barry J. Blake. 2001. Case. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition.
5. Heather Bliss and Elizabeth Ritter. 2001. Developing a database of personal and demonstrative pronoun paradigms: Conceptual and technical challenges. In Steven Bird, Peter Buneman, and Mark Lieberman, editors, Proceedings of the ICRS Workshop on Linguistic Databases. Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, Philadelphia.
6. Penelope Brown and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage.
7. Seth Cable. 2008. Tense, aspect and Aktionsart. Unpublished handout from "Proseminar on Semantic Theory" for Theoretical Perspectives on Languages of the Pacific Northwest. Available at: http://people.umass.edu/scable/PNWSeminar/handouts/Tense/Tense-Background.pdf, Fall.
8. Shobhana L. Chelliah and Willem J. de Reuse. 2011. Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork. Springer Dordrecht, Netherlands.
9. Jinho Choi, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Tim Dozat, Filip Ginter, Yoav Goldberg, Jan Hajič, Christopher Manning, Ryan McDonald, Joakim Nivre, Slav Petrov, Sampo Pyysalo, Natalia Silveira, Reut Tsarfaty, and Dan Zeman. 2015. Universal Dependencies. Accessible at: http://universaldependencies.github.io/docs/, January.
10. Bernard Comrie, Martin Haspelmath, and Balthasar Bickel. 2008. The Leipzig Glossing Rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossingrules.php, February.
11. Bernard Comrie. 1976a. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. Bernard Comrie. 1976b. Linguistic politeness axes: Speaker-addressee, speaker-referent, speakerbystander. Pragmatics Microfiche, 1.7(A3). Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge.
13. Bernard Comrie. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 2nd edition.
14. Greville G. Corbett. 1991. Gender. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Greville G. Corbett. 2000. Number. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
16. William Croft. 2000. Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In Petra M. Vogel and Bernard Comrie, editors, Approaches to the Typology ofWord Classes, pages 65-102. Mouton de Gruyter, New York.
17. Pierluigi Cuzzolin and Christian Lehmann. 2004. Comparison and gradation. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan, and Stavros Skopeteas, editors, Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, volume 2, pages 1212-1220. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
18. Katherine Demuth. 2000. Bantu noun classes: Loanword and acquisition evidence of semantic productivity. In G. Senft, editor, Classification Systems, pages 270-292. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
19. Markus Dreyer and Jason Eisner. 2011. Discovering morphological paradigms from plain text using a Dirichlet process mixture model. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2011, pages 616-627, Edinburgh. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Greg Durrett and John DeNero. 2013. Supervised learning of complete morphological paradigms. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 1185-1195. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta.
21. John Goldsmith. 2001. Unsupervised learning of the morphology of natural language. Computational Linguistics, 27(2):153-198.
22. Harald Hammarström. 2006. A naive theory of morphology and an algorithm for extraction. In Richard Wicentowski and Grzegorz Kondrak, editors, SIGPHON 2006: Proceedings of the 8th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Phonology, pages 79-88, New York. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Martin Haspelmath. 1995. The converb as a crosslinguistically valid category. In Martin Haspelmath and Ekkehard König, editors, Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms-Adverbial Participles, Gerunds, Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, pages 1-56. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
24. Martin Haspelmath. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language, 86(3):663-687, September.
25. M. H. Klaiman. 1991. Grammatical Voice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
26. Wolfgang Klein. 1994. Time in Language. Routledge, New York.
27. Knud Lambrecht. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. Christopher Lyons. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Marie Mikulová, Alevtina Bémová, Jan Hajič, Eva Hajičová, Jiří Havelka, Veronika Kolářová, Lucie Kučová, Markéta Lopatková, Petr Pajas, Jarmila Panevová, Magda Razímová, Petr Sgall, Jan Štepánek, Zdeňka Urešová, Kateřina Veselá, and Zdeněk Žabokrtský. 2006. Annotation on the tectogrammatical level in the Prague Dependency Treebank: Annotation manual. Technical report, U FAL/CKL, Prague. Technical Report TR-2006-30.
30. Frank R. Palmer. 2001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition.
31. Nina V. Radkevich. 2010. On Location: The Structure of Case and Adpositions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
32. Benoît Sagot and Géraldine Walther. 2013. Implementing a formal model of inflectional morphology. In Cerstin Mahlow and Michael Piotrowski, editors, Systems and Frameworks for Computational Morphology, pages 115-134. Springer, Berlin.
33. Lesley Stirling. 1993. Switch-Reference and Discourse Representation. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
34. John Sylak-Glassman, Christo Kirov, Matt Post, Roger Que, and David Yarowsky. To appear. A universal feature schema for rich morphological annotation and fine-grained cross-lingual part-of-speech tagging. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Systems and Frameworks for Computational Morphology, Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
35. Zeno Vendler. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2):143-160, April.
36. Mutsumi Yamamoto. 1999. Animacy and Reference. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
37. Daniel Zeman. 2008. Reusable tagset conversion using tagset drivers. In Proceedings of LREC 2008, pages 213-218.