Correlation of histological vessel characteristics and diffusion-weighted imaging intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 792-797

  Klauß, Miriam ^a   Mayer, Philipp ^a   Bergmann, Frank ^a   Maier Hein, Klaus ^b   Hase, Judith ^a   Hackert, Thilo ^a   Kauczor, Hans Ulrich ^a   Grenacher, Lars ^c   Stieltjes, Bram ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^c Diagnostic Munich   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cancer; DWI; IVIM; MVD; NET; Pancreatic

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL PARAMETERS; BLOOD VOLUME; CAPILLARY DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION DERIVED PARAMETER; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME; VASCULARIZATION; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BREATH HOLDING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; NEOVASCULARIZATION (PATHOLOGY); NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; PANCREAS CARCINOMA; PANCREAS TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VOLUME; BREATH HOLDING; CARCINOMA, PANCREATIC DUCTAL; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PATHOLOGIC; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84943806667     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000187     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Humphries PD, Sebire NJ, Siegel MJ, et al. Tumors in pediatric patients at diffusion-weighted MR imaging: apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity. Radiology. 2007;245:848-854.
2. Schnapauff D, Zeile M, Niederhagen MB, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of tumor cellularity in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29:1355-1359.
3. Wang Y, Chen ZE, Yaghmai V, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in pancreatic endocrine tumors correlated with histopathologic characteristics. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33:1071-1079.
4. Xu Z, Pothula SP, Wilson JS, Apte MV. Pancreatic cancer and its stroma: a conspiracy theory. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:11216-11229.
5. Kim JH, Lee JM, Park JH, et al. Solid pancreatic lesions: characterization by using timing bolus dynamic contrast-enhanced MRimaging assessment-a preliminary study. Radiology. 2013;266:185-196.
6. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;168:497-505.
7. Concia M, Sprinkart AM, Penner AH, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas: diagnostic benefit from an intravoxel incoherent motion model-based 3 b-value analysis. Invest Radiol. 2014;49:93-100.
8. Kang KM, Lee JM, Yoon JH, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterization of focal pancreatic lesions. Radiology. 2014;270:444-453.
9. Klauss M, Lemke A, Grunberg K, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for the differentiation between mass forming chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:57-63.
10. Megibow AJ. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: designing the examination to evaluate the clinical questions. Radiology. 1992;183:297-303.
11. Klimstra DS, Pitman MB, Hruban RH. An algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:454-464.
12. Bakir B, Salmaslioglu A, Poyanli A, et al. Diffusion weighted MR imaging of pancreatic islet cell tumors. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74:214-220.
13. Lee SS, Byun JH, Park BJ, et al. Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas: usefulness in characterizing solid pancreatic masses. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:928-936.
14. Lee HJ, Rha SY, Chung YE, et al. Tumor perfusion-related parameter ofdiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with histological microvessel density. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:1554-1558.
15. Bauerle T, Seyler L, Munter M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal carcinoma patients without and after chemoradiotherapy: a comparative study with histology. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:444-452.
16. Iima M, Reynaud O, Tsurugizawa T, et al. Characterization of glioma micro-circulation and tissue features using intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in a rat brain model. Invest Radiol. 2014;49:485-490.
17. Fritzsche KH, Neher PF, Reicht I, et al. MITK diffusion imaging. Methods Inf Med. 2012;51:441-448.
18. Nolden M, Zelzer S, Seitel A, et al. The Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit: challenges and advances: 10 years of open-source development. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013;8:607-620.
19. Patel J, Sigmund EE, Rusinek H, et al. Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone and in combination: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 31:589-600.
20. Liu Y, Ye Z, Sun H, Bai R. Grading of uterine cervical cancer by using the ADC difference value and its correlation with microvascular density and vascular endo-thelial growth factor. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:757-765.
21. Semelka RC, Custodio CM, Cem Balci N, Woosley JT. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: spectrum of appearances on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11:141-148.
22. Sheth S, Hruban RK, Fishman EK. Helical CT of islet cell tumors of the pancreas: typical and atypical manifestations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179:725-730.
23. van der Zee JA, van Eijck CH, Hop WC, et al. Angiogenesis: a prognostic determinant in pancreatic cancer? Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:2576-2584.
24. Ikeda N, Adachi M, Taki T, et al. Prognostic significance of angiogenesis in human pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:1553-1563.
25. Karademir S, Sokmen S, Terzi C, et al. Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic predictor in pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7:489-495.
26. Takagi K, Takada T, Amano H. A high peripheral microvessel density count correlates with a poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:402-408.
27. Ueda T, Oda T, Kinoshita T, et al. Neovascularization in pancreatic ductal adeno-carcinoma: Microvessel count analysis, comparison with non-cancerous regions and other types of carcinomas. Oncol Rep. 2002;9:239-245.
28. Fujioka S, Yoshida K, Yanagisawa S, et al. Angiogenesis in pancreatic carcinoma: thymidine phosphorylase expression in stromal cells and intratumoral microvessel density as independent predictors of overall and relapse-free survival. Cancer. 2001;92:1788-1797.
29. Khan AW, Dhillon AP, Hutchins R, et al. Prognostic significance of intratumoural microvessel density (IMD) in resected pancreatic and ampullary cancers to standard histopathological variables and survival. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002;28:637-644.
30. Niedergethmann M, Hildenbrand R, Wostbrock B, et al. High expression of vascular endothelial growth factor predicts early recurrence and poor prognosis after curative resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Pancreas. 2002;25:122-129.
31. d'Assignies G, Couvelard A, Bahrami S, et al. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT reflects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factors. Radiology. 2009;250:407-416.
32. Marion-Audibert AM, Barel C, Gouysse G, et al. Low microvessel density is an unfavorable histoprognostic factor in pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastroenterol-ogy. 2003;125:1094-1104.
33. Ellis LM, Takahashi Y, Fenoglio CJ, et al. Vessel counts and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34: 337-340.
34. Barau A, Ruiz-Sauri A, Valencia G, et al. High microvessel density in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with high grade. Virchows Arch. 2013;462: 541-546.
35. Wetscherek A, Stieltjes B, Laun FB. Flow-compensated intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2014. [Epub ahead of print].
36. Lemke A, Laun FB, Schad LR, et al. Towards an optimal distribution of b-values for IVIM imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;29:766-776.
37. Wurnig MC, Donati OF, Ulbrich E, et al. Systematic analysis of the intravoxel incoherent motion threshold separating perfusion and diffusion effects: proposal of a standardized algorithm. Magn Reson Med. 2014. [Epub ahead of print].