Building a semantic parser overnight

ACL-IJCNLP 2015 - 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2015, Pages 1332-1342

  Wang, Yushi ^a   Berant, Jonathan ^a   Liang, Percy ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

COMPOSITIONALITY; LOGICAL FORMS; TRAINING EXAMPLE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84943776557     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p15-1129     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Y. Artzi and L. Zettlemoyer. 2011. Bootstrapping semantic parsers from conversations. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 421-432.
2. Y. Artzi and L. Zettlemoyer. 2013. Weakly supervised learning of semantic parsers for mapping instructions to actions. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL), 1:49-62.
3. J. Berant and P. Liang. 2014. Semantic parsing via paraphrasing. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
4. J. Berant, A. Chou, R. Frostig, and P. Liang. 2013. Semantic parsing on Freebase from question-Answer pairs. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
5. Q. Cai and A. Yates. 2013. Large-scale semantic parsing via schema matching and lexicon extension. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
6. J. Clarke, D. Goldwasser, M. Chang, and D. Roth. 2010. Driving semantic parsing from the worlds response. In Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 18-27.
7. J. Duchi, E. Hazan, and Y. Singer. 2010. Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. In Conference on Learning Theory (COLT).
8. A. Fader, L. Zettlemoyer, and O. Etzioni. 2013. Paraphrase-driven learning for open question answering. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
9. J. Ganitkevitch, B. V. Durme, and C. Callison-Burch. 2013. PPDB: The paraphrase database. In Human Language Technology and North American Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT/NAACL), pages 758-764.
10. J. Krishnamurthy and T. Kollar. 2013. Jointly learning to parse and perceive: Connecting natural language to the physical world. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL), 1:193-206.
11. N. Kushman and R. Barzilay. 2013. Using semantic unification to generate regular expressions from natural language. In Human Language Technology and North American Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT/NAACL), pages 826-836.
12. T. Kwiatkowski, E. Choi, Y. Artzi, and L. Zettlemoyer. 2013. Scaling semantic parsers with on-The-fly ontology matching. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
13. P. Liang, B. Taskar, and D. Klein. 2006. Alignment by agreement. In North American Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), pages 104-111.
14. P. Liang, M. I. Jordan, and D. Klein. 2011. Learning dependency-based compositional semantics. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 590-599.
15. P. Liang. 2013. Lambda dependency-based compositional semantics. arXiv.
16. C. Matuszek, N. FitzGerald, L. Zettlemoyer, L. Bo, and D. Fox. 2012. A joint model of language and perception for grounded attribute learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 1671-1678.
17. F. J. Och and H. Ney. 2004. The alignment template approach to statistical machine translation. Computational Linguistics, 30:417-449.
18. P. Pasupat and P. Liang. 2015. Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
19. R. A. P. Rangel, M. A. Aguirre, J. J. Gonzlez, and J. M. Carpio. 2014. Features and pitfalls that users should seek in natural language interfaces to databases. In Recent Advances on Hybrid Approaches for Designing Intelligent Systems, pages 617-630.
20. S. Reddy, M. Lapata, and M. Steedman. 2014. Largescale semantic parsing without question-Answer pairs. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL), 2(10):377-392.
21. R. Schwitter. 2010. Controlled natural languages for knowledge representation. In International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 1113-1121.
22. S. Tellex, T. Kollar, S. Dickerson, M. R. Walter, A. G. Banerjee, S. J. Teller, and N. Roy. 2011. Understanding natural language commands for robotic navigation and mobile manipulation. In Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).
23. D. Warren and F. Pereira. 1982. An efficient easily adaptable system for interpreting natural language queries. Computational Linguistics, 8:110-122.
24. Y. W. Wong and R. J. Mooney. 2007. Learning synchronous grammars for semantic parsing with lambda calculus. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 960-967.
25. W. A. Woods, R. M. Kaplan, and B. N. Webber. 1972. The lunar sciences natural language information system: Final report. Technical report, BBN Report 2378, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.
26. M. Zelle and R. J. Mooney. 1996. Learning to parse database queries using inductive logic programming. In Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 1050-1055.
27. L. S. Zettlemoyer and M. Collins. 2005. Learning to map sentences to logical form: Structured classification with probabilistic categorial grammars. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), pages 658-666.