Divergent DNA methylation patterns associated with gene expression in rice cultivars with contrasting drought and salinity stress response

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Garg, Rohini ^a   Narayana Chevala, Vvs ^a   Shankar, Rama ^a   Jain, Mukesh ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENOME RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANT PROTEIN; SMALL UNTRANSLATED RNA;

ADAPTATION; CLASSIFICATION; DNA METHYLATION; DROUGHT; EPIGENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; ORYZA; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PROCEDURES; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SALINITY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; DNA METHYLATION; DROUGHTS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; EPIGENOMICS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; ORYZA; PLANT PROTEINS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, SMALL UNTRANSLATED; SALINITY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84943749246     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep14922     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Soppe, W. J. et al. The late flowering phenotype of fwa mutants is caused by gain-of-function epigenetic alleles of a homeodomain gene. Mol. Cell 6, 791-802 (2000).
2. Manning, K. et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat. Genet. 38, 948-952 (2006).
3. Miura, K. et al. A metastable DWARF1 epigenetic mutant affecting plant stature in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11218-11223 (2009).
4. Lindroth, A. M. et al. Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for maintenance of CpXpG methylation. Science 292, 2077-2080 (2001).
5. Cao, X. & Jacobsen, S. E. Role of the Arabidopsis DRM methyltransferases in de novo DNA methylation and gene silencing. Curr. Biol. 12, 1138-1144 (2002).
6. Kato, M., Miura, A., Bender, J., Jacobsen, S. E. & Kakutani, T. Role of CG and non-CG methylation in immobilization of transposons in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 13, 421-426 (2003).
7. Hsieh, T. F. et al. Genome-wide demethylation of Arabidopsis endosperm. Science 324, 1451-1454 (2009).
8. Gazzani, S., Gendall, A. R., Lister, C. & Dean, C. Analysis of the molecular basis of flowering time variation in Arabidopsis accessions. Plant Physiol. 132, 1107-1114 (2003).
9. Liu, J., He, Y., Amasino, R. & Chen, X. siRNAs targeting an intronic transposon in the regulation of natural flowering behavior in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 18, 2873-2878 (2004).
10. Song, Q. X. et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in soybean. Mol. Plant 6, 1961-1974 (2013).
11. Saze, H., MittelstenScheid, O. & Paszkowski, J. Maintenance of CpG methylation is essential for epigenetic inheritance during plant gametogenesis. Nat. Genet. 34, 65-69 (2003).
12. Gehring, M., Bubb, K. L. & Henikoff, S. Extensive demethylation of repetitive elements during seed development underlies gene imprinting. Science 324, 1447-1451 (2009).
13. Zemach, A. et al. Local DNA hypomethylation activates genes in rice endosperm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18729-18734 (2010).
14. Chen, X. & Zhou, D. X. Rice epigenomics and epigenetics: challenges and opportunities. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16, 164-169 (2013).
15. Chinnusamy, V. & Zhu, J. K. Epigenetic regulation of stress responses in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, 133-139 (2009).
16. Mirouze, M. et al. Selective epigenetic control of retrotransposition in Arabidopsis. Nature 461, 427-430 (2009).
17. Lang-Mladek, C. et al. Transgenerational inheritance and resetting of stress-induced loss of epigenetic gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 3, 594-602 (2010).
18. Dowen, R. H. et al. Widespread dynamic DNA methylation in response to biotic stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2183-2191 (2012).
19. Uthup, T. K., Ravindran, M., Bini, K. & Thakurdas, S. Divergent DNA methylation patterns associated with abiotic stress in Heveabrasiliensis. Mol. Plant 4, 996-1013 (2011).
20. Shaik, R. & Ramakrishna, W. Bioinformatic analysis of epigenetic and microRNA mediated regulation of drought responsive genes in rice. PLoS ONE 7, e49331 (2012).
21. Bilichak, A., Ilnystkyy, Y., Hollunder, J. & Kovalchuk, I. The progeny of Arabidopsis thaliana plants exposed to salt exhibit changes in DNA methylation, histone modifications and gene expression. PLoS ONE 7, e30515 (2012).
22. McNally, K. L. et al. Genomewide SNP variation reveals relationships among landraces and modern varieties of rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 12273-12278 (2009).
23. Nakashima, K., Ito, Y. & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiol. 149, 88-95 (2009).
24. Bhattacharjee, A. & Jain, M. Transcription factor mediated abiotic stress signaling in rice. In: Plant Stress - Stress-Mediated Signaling in Plants (Pandey, G. K. ed.) 7, 16-25. Global Science Books, Academic Press, Japan (2013).
25. Jain, M., Moharana, K. C., Shankar, R., Kumari, R. & Garg, R. Genome wide discovery of DNA polymorphisms in rice cultivars with contrasting drought and salinity stress response and their functional relevance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 253-264 (2014).
26. Wang, W. S. et al. Drought-induced site-specific DNA methylation and its association with drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Exp. Bot. 62, 1951-1960 (2011).
27. Karan, R., DeLeon, T., Biradar, H. & Subudhi, P. K. Salt stress induced variation in DNA methylation pattern and its influence on gene expression in contrasting rice genotypes. PLoS ONE 7, e40203 (2012).
28. Cokus, S. J. et al. Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature 452, 215-219 (2008).
29. Calarco, J. P. et al. Reprogramming of DNA methylation in pollen guides epigenetic inheritance via small RNA. Cell 151, 194-205 (2012).
30. Zhong, S. et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 154-159 (2013).
31. Beck, S. & Rakyan, V. K. The methylome: approaches for global DNA methylation profiling. Trends Genet. 24, 231-237 (2008).
32. Lister, R. et al. Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in Arabidopsis. Cell 133, 523-536 (2008).
33. Schmitz, R. J. & Zhang, X. High-throughput approaches for plant epigenomic studies. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14, 130-136 (2011).
34. Kim, K. D., El, Baidouri, M. & Jackson, S. A. Accessing epigenetic variation in the plant methylome. Brief. Funct. Genomics 13, 318-327 (2014).
35. Walia, H. et al. Comparative transcriptional profiling of two contrasting rice genotypes under salinity stress during the vegetative growth stage. Plant Physiol. 139, 822-835 (2005).
36. Lenka, S. K., Katiyar, A., Chinnusamy, V. & Bansal, K. C. Comparative analysis of drought-responsive transcriptome in Indica rice genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 9, 315-327 (2011).
37. Greaves, I. K. et al. Trans chromosomal methylation in Arabidopsis hybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3570-3575 (2012).
38. Law, J. A. & Jacobsen, S. E. Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 204-220 (2010).
39. Gent, J. I. et al. CHH islands: de novo DNA methylation in near-gene chromatin regulation in maize. Genome Res. 23, 628-637 (2013).
40. Kawasaki, S. et al. Gene expression profiles during the initial phase of salt stress in rice. Plant Cell 13, 889-905 (2001).
41. Ray, S. et al. Modulation of transcription factor and metabolic pathway genes in response to water-deficit stress in rice. Funct. Integr. Genomics 11, 157-178 (2011).
42. Le, T. N. et al. DNA demethylases target promoter transposable elements to positively regulate stress responsive genes in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol. 15, 458 (2014).
43. Kapoor, M. et al. Genome-wide identification, organization and phylogenetic analysis of Dicer-like, Argonaute and RNAdependent RNA Polymerase gene families and their expression analysis during reproductive development and stress in rice. BMC Genomics 9, 451 (2008).
44. Sharma, R. et al. Rice cytosine DNA methyltransferases-gene expression profiling during reproductive development and abiotic stress. FEBS J. 276, 6301-6311 (2009).
45. Boyko, A. et al. Transgenerational adaptation of Arabidopsis to stress requires DNA methylation and the function of Dicer-like proteins. PLoS ONE 5, e9514 (2010).
46. Zheng, X. et al. Transgenerational variations in DNA methylation induced by drought stress in two rice varieties with distinguished difference to drought resistance. PLoS ONE 8, e80253 (2013).
47. Wang, M. et al. Induced and constitutive DNA methylation in a salinity-tolerant wheat introgression line. Plant Cell Physiol. 55, 1354-1365 (2014).
48. Choi, C. S. & Sano, H. Abiotic-stress induces demethylation and transcriptional activation of a gene encoding a glycerophosphodiesterase-like protein in tobacco plants. Mol. Genet. Genomics 277, 589-600 (2007).
49. Angers, B., Castonguay, E. & Massicotte, R. Environmentally induced phenotypes and DNA methylation: how to deal with unpredictable conditions until the next generation and after. Mol. Ecol. 19, 1283-1295 (2010).
50. Gayacharan & Joel, A. J. Epigenetic responses to drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 19, 379-387 (2013).
51. Steward, N., Ito, M., Yamaguchi, Y., Koizumi, N. & Sano, H. Periodic DNA methylation in maize nucleosomes and demethylation by environmental stress. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 37741-37746 (2002).
52. Wada, Y., Miyamoto, K., Kusano, T. & Sano, H. Association between up-regulation of stress-responsive genes and hypomethylation of genomic DNA in tobacco plants. Mol. Genet. Genomics 271, 658-666 (2004).
53. Zilberman, D., Gehring, M., Tran, R. K., Ballinger, T. & Henikoff, S. Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription. Nat. Genet. 39, 61-69 (2007).
54. Jones, P. L. et al. Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat. Genet. 19, 187-191 (1998).
55. Nan, X. et al. Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature 393, 386-389 (1998).
56. Ng, H. H. & Bird, A. DNA methylation and chromatin modification. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 158-163 (1999).
57. Clouaire, T. & Stancheva, I. Methyl-CpG binding proteins: specialized transcriptional repressors or structural components of chromatin? Cell Mol. Life Sci. 65, 1509-1522 (2008).
58. Watt, F. & Molloy, P. L. Cytosine methylation prevents binding to DNA of a HeLa cell transcription factor required for optimal expression of the adenovirus major late promoter. Genes Dev. 2, 1136-1143 (1988).
59. Bird, A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 16, 6-21 (2002).
60. Scebba, F. et al. Arabidopsis MBD proteins show different binding specificities and nuclear localization. Plant Mol. Biol. 53, 715-731 (2003).
61. Hohn, T., Corsten, S., Rieke, S., Müller, M. & Rothnie, H. Methylation of coding region alone inhibits gene expression in plant protoplasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 8334-8339 (1996).
62. Wu, H. et al. Dnmt3a-dependent nonpromoter DNA methylation facilitates transcription of neurogenic genes. Science 329, 444-448 (2010).
63. Wang, Y., Wang, X., Lee, T. H., Mansoor, S. & Paterson, A. H. Gene body methylation shows distinct patterns associated with different gene origins and duplication modes and has a heterogeneous relationship with gene expression in Oryza sativa (rice). New Phytol. 198, 274-283 (2013).
64. Yamamuro, C. et al. Overproduction of stomatal lineage cells in Arabidopsis mutants defective in active DNA demethylation. Nat. Commun. 5, 4062 (2014).
65. Slotkin, R. K. & Martienssen, R. Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 272-285 (2007).
66. Lisch, D. Epigenetic regulation of transposable elements in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60, 43-66 (2009).
67. Liu, S. et al. Mu transposon insertion sites and meiotic recombination events co-localize with epigenetic marks for open chromatin across the maize genome. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000733 (2009).
68. Zemach, A., McDaniel, I. E., Silva, P. & Zilberman, D. Genome-wide evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic DNA methylation. Science 328, 916-919 (2010).
69. Lippman, Z. et al. Role of transposable elements in heterochromatin and epigenetic control. Nature 430, 471-476 (2004).
70. Hollister, J. D. & Gaut, B. S. Epigenetic silencing of transposable elements: a trade-off between reduced transposition and deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression. Genome Res. 19, 1419-1428 (2009).
71. Ahmed, I., Sarazin, A., Bowler, C., Colot, V. & Quesneville, H. Genome-wide evidence for local DNA methylation spreading from small RNA-targeted sequences in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 6919-6931 (2011).
72. Stroud, H. et al. Plants regenerated from tissue culture contain stable epigenome changes in rice. Elife 2, e00354 (2013).
73. Ou, X. et al. Transgenerational inheritance of modified DNA methylation patterns and enhanced tolerance induced by heavy metal stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS ONE 7, e41143 (2012).
74. Pecinka, A. & MittelstenScheid, O. Stress-induced chromatin changes: a critical view on their heritability. Plant Cell Physiol. 53, 801-808 (2012).
75. Ito, H. et al. An siRNA pathway prevents transgenerational retrotransposition in plants subjected to stress. Nature 472, 115-119 (2011).
76. Cao, X. & Jacobsen, S. E. Locus-specific control of asymmetric and CpNpG methylation by the DRM and CMT3 methyltransferase genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16491-16498 (2002).
77. Zheng, X., Zhu, J., Kapoor, A. & Zhu, J. K. Role of Arabidopsis AGO6 in siRNA accumulation, DNA methylation and transcriptional gene silencing. EMBO J. 26, 1691-1701 (2007).
78. Patel, R. K. & Jain, M. NGS QC Toolkit: a toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS ONE 7, e30619 (2012).
79. Krueger, F. & Andrews, S. R. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics 27, 1571-1572 (2011).
80. Garg, R., Sahoo, A., Tyagi, A. K. & Jain, M. Validation of internal control genes for quantitative gene expression studies in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 396, 283-288 (2010).
81. Garg, R., Bhattacharjee, A. & Jain, M. Genome-scale transcriptomic insights into molecular aspects of abiotic stress responses in chickpea. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 33, 388-400 (2015).
82. Jain, M., Chevala, V. V. S. N. & Garg, R. Genome-wide discovery, analysis and implications of differential regulation of conserved and novel miRNAs in chickpea via deep sequencing. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 5945-5958 (2014).
83. Jain, M., Nijhawan, A., Tyagi, A. K. & Khurana, J. P. Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 345, 646-651 (2006).