GeIST: A pipeline for mapping integrated DNA elements

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 19, 2015, Pages 3219-3221

  La Fave, Matthew C ^a   Varshney, Gaurav K ^a   Burgess, Shawn M ^a  

^a NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC MARKER; TRANSPOSON;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; DEPENDOPARVOVIRUS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; MOUSE; MURINE LEUKEMIA VIRUS; PROCEDURES; TRANSPOSON; WORKFLOW;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, GENETIC; DEPENDOVIRUS; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOMICS; HUMANS; LEUKEMIA VIRUS, MURINE; MICE; MUTAGENESIS, INSERTIONAL; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84943387675     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv350     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bard-Chapeau, E.A. et al. (2014) Transposon mutagenesis identifies genes driving hepatocellular carcinoma in a chronic hepatitis B mouse model. Nat. Genetics, 46, 24-32
2. Barnett, D.W. et al. (2011) BamTools: a C API and toolkit for analyzing and managing BAM files. Bioinformatics, 27, 1691-1692
3. Chandler, R.J. et al. (2015) Vector design influences hepatic genotoxicity after adeno-associated virus gene therapy. J. Clin. Invest., 125, 870-880
4. Clark, K.J. et al. (2011) In vivo protein trapping produces a functional expression codex of the vertebrate proteome. Nat. Methods, 8, 506-515
5. Devon, R.S. et al. (1995) Splinkerettes-improved vectorettes for greater efficiency in PCR walking. Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 1644-1645
6. Golling, G. et al. (2002) Insertional mutagenesis in zebrafish rapidly identifies genes essential for early vertebrate development. Nat. Genet. 31, 135-140
7. Kent, W.J. et al. (2002) The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res., 12, 996-1006
8. Kleckner, N. et al. (1977) Genetic engineering in vivo using translocatable drug-resistance elements. New methods in bacterial genetics. J. Mol. Biol., 116, 125-159
9. LaFave, M.C. et al. (2014) MLV integration site selection is driven by strong enhancers and active promoters. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 4257-4269
10. Langmead, B. et al. (2009) Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol., 10, R25
11. Li, H. et al. (2009) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25, 2078-2079
12. Li, H. et al. (2011) Assessing the potential for AAV vector genotoxicity in a murine model. Blood, 117, 3311-3319
13. Linden, R.M. et al. (1996) Site-specific integration by adeno-associated virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 11288-11294
14. Martin, M. (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J., 17, 10-12
15. O'Kane, C.J. and Gehring, W.J. (1987) Detection in situ of genomic regulatory elements in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 9123-9127
16. Ochman, H. et al. (1988) Genetic applications of an inverse polymerase chain reaction. Genetics, 120, 621-623
17. Varshney, G.K. et al. (2013) A large-scale zebrafish gene knockout resource for the genome-wide study of gene function. Genome Res., 23, 727-735
18. Walia, J.S. et al. (2014) Long-term correction of sandhoff disease following intravenous delivery of rAAV9 to mouse neonates. Mol. Ther., 23, 414-422
19. Wu, X. et al. (2003) Transcription start regions in the human genome are favored targets for MLV integration. Science, 300, 1749-1751