Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology

Gerontologist

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 724-734

  Schulz, Richard ^a   Wahl, Hans Werner ^b   Matthews, Judith T ^c   De Vito Dabbs, Annette ^c   Beach, Scott R ^c   Czaja, Sara J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Health; Technology; Well being

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGING; DISABLED PERSON; GERIATRICS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; QUALITY OF LIFE; TECHNOLOGY; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

AGED; AGING; DISABLED PERSONS; GERIATRICS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; LIFE EXPECTANCY; QUALITY OF LIFE; TECHNOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84943380652     PISSN: 00169013     EISSN: 17585341     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnu071     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1-34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barrett, L. L. (2008). Older adults and family caregivers perceptions and use of technology to maintain independence: A literature review. Washington, DC: AARP Foundation.
3. Bashshur, R., Shannon, G., Krupinski, E., & Grigsby, J. (2011). The taxonomy of telemedicine. Telemedicine and E-health, 17, 484-494. doi:10.1089/tmj.2011.0103
4. Bougie, I. T. (2008). ISO 9999 assistive products for persons with disability-Classification and terminology. In A. Helal, M. Mokhtari, & B. Abdulrazak (Eds.), The engineering handbook of smart technology for aging, disability and independence (chapter 6). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
5. Bouma, H., & Graafmans, J. (1992). Gerontechnology. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
6. Carretero, S., Stewart, J., Centeno, C., Barbabella, F., Schmidt, A., Lamontagne-Godwin, F., & Lamura, G. (2013). Can technology-based services support long-Term care challenges in home care? Analysis of evidence from social innovation good practices across the EU CARICT Project Summary Report, JRC Scientific and Technical Report. Brussels/Sevilla: European Commission.
7. Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913-1915. doi:10.1126/science.1127488
8. Charness, N., & Boot, W. R. (2009). Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 253-258. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01647.x
9. Charness, N., & Bosman, E. A. (1990). Human factors and design for older adults. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed., pp. 446-463). New York: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-101280-9.50006-1
10. Charness, N., Schumann, C. E., & Boritz, G. M. (1992). Training older adults in word processing: Effects of age, training technique, and computer anxiety. International Journal of Technology and Aging, 5, 79-106.
11. Chaudhry, S. I., Mattera, J. A., Curtis, J. P., Spertus, J. A., Herrin, J., Lin, Z., Krumholz, H. M. (2010). Telemonitoring in patients with heart failure. New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 2301-2309. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1010029
12. Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S., Rogers, W., Sharit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center on Research and Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21, 333-352. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333.
13. Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (1998). Ability-performance relationships as a function of age and task experience for a data entry task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 332-351. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.4.4.332
14. Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. (2001). The Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE): A program to enhance technology for older adults. Gerontechnology, 1, 50-59. doi:10.4017/gt.2001.01.01.005.00
15. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and use acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008
16. Ekeland, A. G., Bowes, A., & Flottorp, S. (2010). Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79, 736-771. doi:10.1016/j. ijmedinf.2010.08.006
17. Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2009). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approach (2nd ed.). London: CRC Associates.
18. Fozard, J. L., & Fisk A. D. (1988). Human factors and the aging population. Human Factors Bulletin, 31, 1-2.
19. Gell, N. M., Rosenberg, D. E., Demiris, G., LaCroix, A. Z., & Patel, K. V. (2013). Patterns of technology use among older adults with and without disabilities. The Gerontologist. doi:10.1093/geront/gnt166
20. Godwin, K. M., Mills, W. L., Anderson, J. A., & Kunik, M. E. (2013). Technology-driven interventions for caregivers of persons with dementia: A systematic review. American Journal of Alzheimers Disease & Other Dementias, 28, 216-222. doi:10.1177/1533317513481091
21. Gövercin, M., Költzsch, Y., Meis, M., Wegel, S., Gietzelt, M., Spehr, J., Steinhagen-Theissen, E. (2010). Defining the user requirements for wearable and optical fall prediction devices for home use. Informatics for Health & Social Care, 35, 177-187. doi:10. 3109/17538157.2010.528648
22. Hailey, D., Roine, R., & Ohinmaa, A. (2002). Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 8(Suppl. 1), 1-30. doi:10.1258/1357633021937604
23. Han, K., Lee, J., & Song, W-K. (2013). Application scenarios for assistive robots based on in-depth focus group interviews and clinical expert meetings. 44th International Symposium on Robotics, pp. 1-2. doi:10.1109/ISR.2013.6695679
24. Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of lifespan development. Psychological Review, 117, 32-60. doi:10.1037/a0017668
25. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2006). The influence of a robots social abilities on acceptance by elderly users. Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 521-526. doi:10.1109/ ROMAN.2006.314442
26. Jimison, H., Gorman, P., Woods, S., Nygren, P., Walker, M., Norris, S., & Hersh, W. (2008). Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 175.)
27. Kanade, T. (Guest Editor). (2012). Quality of life technology. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100, 2394-2396. doi:10.1109/ JPROC.2012.2200555
28. Kelley, J. F. (1984). An iterative design methodology for userfriendly natural language office information applications. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 2, 26-41. doi:10.1145/357417.357420
29. Kohlbacher, F., & Hang, C. (2011). Applying the disruptive innovation framework to the silver market. Ageing International, 36, 82-101. doi:10.1007/s12126-010-9076-x
30. Koncelik, J. A. (1982). Ageing and the product environment. Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company.
31. Lindenberger, U., Lövdán, M., Schellenbach, M., Li, S.-C., & Krüger, A. (2008). Psychological principles of successful aging technologies: A mini-review. Gerontology, 54, 59-68. doi:10.1159/000116114
32. Liu, A. L., Hile, H., Kautz, H., Borriello, G., Brown, P. A., Harniss, M., & Johnson, K. (2008). Indoor wayfinding: Developing a functional interface for individuals with cognitive impairments. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 3, 69-81. doi:10.1080/17483100701500173
33. McGee-Lennon, M., Smeaton, A., & Brewster, S. (2012). Designing home care reminder systems: Lessons learned through co-design with older users. 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 49-56.
34. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
35. Riley, W. T., Glasgow, R. E., Etheredge, L., & Abernethy, A. P. (2013). Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: A call for a rapid learning health research enterprise. Clinical and Translational Medicine, 2, 10. doi:10.1186/2001-1326-2-10
36. Robinson, P. K., & Birren, J. E. (1984). Aging and technological advances: Introduction. In P. K. Robinson, J. Livingston, & J. E. Birren (Eds.), Aging and technological advances (pp. 1-4). New York: Plenum. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-2401-0-1
37. Rogers, A., & Mead, N. (2004). More than technology and access: Primary care patients views on the use and non-use of health information in the Internet age. Health & Social Care in the Community, 12, 102-110. doi:10.1111/j.0966-0410.2004.00473.x
38. Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2010). Toward a psychological science of advanced technology design for older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 65B, 645-653. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbq065
39. Rogers, W. A., Gilbert, D. K., & Cabrera, E. F. (1997). An analysis of automatic teller machine usage by older adults: A structured interview approach. Applied Ergonomics, 28, 173-180. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(96)00076-2
40. Roine, R., Ohinmaa, A., & Hailey, D. (2001). Assessing telemedicine: A systematic review of the literature. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 165, 765-771. PMCID: PMC81454.
41. Schatzberg, E. (2006). Technik comes to America: Changing meanings of technology before 1930. Technology and Culture, 47, 486-512. doi:10.1353/tech.2006.0201
42. Schulz, R. (Ed.). (2013). Quality of life technology handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group.
43. Slaughter, S. E., Estabrooks, C. A., Jones, C. A., & Wagg, A. S. (2011). Mobility of Vulnerable Elders (MOVE): Study protocol to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of a mobility intervention in long-Term care facilities. BMC Geriatrics, 11:84. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-11-84
44. Spinsante, S., Antonicelli, R., Mazzanti, I., & Gambi, E. (2012). Technological approaches to remote monitoring of elderly people in cardiology: A usability perspective. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications. doi:10.1155/2012/104561
45. Steventon, A., Bardsley, M., Billings, J., Dixon, J., Doll, H., Beynon, M., Newman, S. (2013). Effect of telecare on use of health and social care services: Findings from the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Age and Ageing, 42, 501-508. doi:10.1093/ageing/aft008
46. Steventon, A., Bardsley, M., Billings, J., Dixon, J., Doll, H., Hirani, S., Newman, S. (2012). Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: Findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. British Medical Journal, 344, e3874. doi:10.1136/bmj.e3874
47. Tan, O., Ng, J., Wong, A., & Kiat, K. W. (2012). Bridging gaps between three-generation families needs and attitudes towards e-health technologies. IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services, pp. 530-533. doi:10.1109/HealthCom.2012.6379479
48. Topo, P. (2009). Technology studies to meet the needs of people with dementia and their caregivers. A literature review. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28, 5-37. doi:10.1177/0733464808324019
49. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36, 157-178. doi:10.1109/TEM.2010.2058851
50. Wagner, C. (2009). Tele-care and robo-Therapy: Vision and reality of living with robots in Japans aging society. In M. Godzik (Ed.), Japanstudien 21. Altern in Japan (pp. 271-298). Munich, Germany: Iudicium Verlag.
51. Wootton, R. (2012). Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management-An evidence synthesis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 18, 211-220. doi:10.1258/jtt.2012.120219