Prenatal whole-exome sequencing: Parental attitudes

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1030-1036

  Kalynchuk, Eve J ^a   Althouse, Andrew ^b   Parker, Lisa S ^a   Saller, Devereux N ^b   Rajkovic, Aleksandar ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNIOCENTESIS; ARTICLE; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; EXOME; EXPECTANT PARENT; FAMILY HISTORY; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MALE; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WHOLE EXOME SEQUENCING; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DNA SEQUENCE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRENATAL CARE; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; EXOME; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84943359380     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4635     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Yang Y, Muzny DM, Reid JG, et al. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of Mendelian disorders. N Engl J Med 2013;369(16):1502-11.
2. Farwell KD, Shahmirzadi L, El-Khechen D, et al. Enhanced utility of family-centered diagnostic exome sequencing with inheritance model-based analysis: results from 500 unselected families with undiagnosed genetic conditions. Genet Med 2014, PMID: 25356970.
3. Pinxten W, Howard HC. Ethical issues raised by whole genome sequencing. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014;28(2):269-79.
4. Ross LF, Saal HM, David KL, Anderson RR. Technical report: ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Genet Med 2013;15(3):234-45.
5. May T, Zusevics KL, Strong KA. On the ethics of clinical whole genome sequencing of children. Pediatrics 2013;132(2):207-9.
6. Allyse M, Michie M. Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing. Trends Biotechnol 2013;31(8):439-41.
7. Wolf SM, Annas GJ, Elias S. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics. Science 2013;340(6136):1049-50.
8. Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med 2013;15(7):565-74.
9. ACMG Board of Directors. ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing. Genet Med 2015;17(1):68-9.
10. Yu J-H, Harrell TM, Jamal SM, et al. Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing. Am J Hum Genet 2014;95(1):77-84.
11. Yu J-H, Crouch J, Jamal SM, et al. Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing. Am J Med Genet A 2014;164(9):2153-60.
12. Yu J-H, Crouch J, Jamal SM, et al. Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing. Am J Med Genet A 2013;161(5):1064-72.
13. Bombard Y, Miller FA, Hayeems RZ, et al. Public views on participating in newborn screening using genome sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet 2014;22(11):1248-54.
14. Goldenberg AJ, Dodson DS, Davis MM, Tarini BA. Parents' interest in whole-genome sequencing of newborns. Genet Med 2014;16(1):78-84.
15. Donley G, Hull SC, Berkman BE. Prenatal whole genome sequencing: just because we can, should we? Hastings Cent Rep 2012;42(4):28-40.
16. Yurkiewicz IR, Korf BR, Lehmann LS. Prenatal whole-genome sequencing - is the quest to know a fetus's future ethical? N Engl J Med 2014;370(3):195-7.
17. ACMG Board of Directors. Points to consider in the clinical application of genomic sequencing. Genet Med 2012;14(8):759-61.
18. McGillivray G, Rosenfeld JA, McKinlay Gardner RJ, Gillam LH. Genetic counselling and ethical issues with chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn 2012;32(4):389-95.
19. Bernhardt BA, Soucier D, Hanson K, et al. Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results. Genet Med 2013;15(2):139-45.
20. Hillman SC, Willams D, Carss KJ, et al. Prenatal exome sequencing for fetuses with structural abnormalities: the next step. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45(1):4-9.
21. Etchegary H, Dicks E, Hodgkinson K, et al. Public attitudes about genetic testing in the newborn period. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2012;41(2):191-200.
22. Ambry genetics ExomeNext. Available from: http://www.ambrygen.com/exomenext [cited 2014 November 22].
23. Baylor College of Medicine whole exome sequencing. Available from: https://www.bcm.edu/research/medical-genetics-labs/test_detail.cfm?testcode=1500 [cited 22 November 2014].
24. Saunders CJ, Miller NA, Soden SE, et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing for genetic disease diagnosis in neonatal intensive care units. Sci Transl Med 2012;4(154):154ra35.
25. U.S. Census Bureau. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Available from: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/42/42003.html [updated 8 July 2014; cited 19 November 2014].
26. Yu J-H, Crouch J, Jamal SM, et al. Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing. Am J Med Genet A 2014;164(9):2153-60.
27. Waisbren SE, Back DK, Liu C, et al. Parents are interested in newborn genomic testing during the early postpartum period. Genet Med 2015;17(6):501-4.
28. Sapp JC, Dong D, Stark C, et al. Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children. Clin Genet 2014;85(2):120-6.
29. Yatsenko SA, Davis S, Hendrix NW, et al. Application of chromosomal microarray in the evaluation of abnormal prenatal findings. Clin Genet 2013;84(1):47-54.