SBMLsqueezer 2: Context-sensitive creation of kinetic equations in biochemical networks

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Dräger, Andreas ^a,b   Zielinski, Daniel C ^a   Keller, Roland ^b   Rall, Matthias ^b   Eichner, Johannes ^b   Palsson, Bernhard O ^a,c   Zell, Andreas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c Chalmers University of Technology   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Biological networks; Information extraction; Mathematical modeling; Metabolic engineering; Regulatory networks; Software engineering

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84943302689     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12918-015-0212-9     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. O'Brien EJ, Lerman JA, Chang RL, Hyduke DR, Palsson BO, Brien EJO, et al. Genome-scale models of metabolism and gene expression extend and refine growth phenotype prediction. Mol Syst Biol. 2013;9(693). doi:10.1038/msb.2013.52.
2. Karr JR, Sanghvi JC, Macklin DN, Gutschow MV, Jacobs JM, Jr Bolival B, et al. A Whole-Cell Computational Model Predicts Phenotype from Genotype. Cell. 2012;150(2):389-401. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.044.
3. Overbeek R, Begley T, Butler RM, Choudhuri JV, Chuang HY, Cohoon M, et al. The Subsystems Approach to Genome Annotation and its Use in the Project to Annotate 1000 Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(17): 5691-702. doi:10.1093/nar/gki866. http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/content/33/17/5691.full.pdf+html.
4. Thiele I, Palsson BØ. A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(1):93-121. doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.203.
5. Zielinski DC, Palsson BØ. Kinetic Modeling of Metabolic Networks. In: Wittmann C, Lee SY, editors. Systems Metabolic Engineering. Van Godewijckstraat 30 3311 GX Dordrecht Netherlands: Springer Netherlands, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.; 2012. p. 25-55. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4534-6_2.
6. Dräger A, Kronfeld M, Ziller MJ, Supper J, Planatscher H, Magnus JB, et al. Modeling metabolic networks in C. glutamicum: a comparison of rate laws in combination with various parameter optimization strategies. BMC Syst Biol. 2009;3:5. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-3-5.
7. Hoops S, Sahle S, Gauges R, Lee C, Pahle J, Simus N, et al. COPASI-a COmplex PAthway SImulator. Bioinforma. 2006;22(24):3067-074. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl485.
8. Funahashi A, Jouraku A, Matsuoka Y, Kitano H. Integration of CellDesigner and SABIO-RK. In Silico Biology. 2007;7(2 Suppl):81-90.
9. Shapiro BE, Levchenko A, Meyerowitz EM, Wold BJ, Mjolsness ED. Cellerator: extending a computer algebra system to include biochemical arrows for signal transduction simulations. Bioinforma. 2002;19(5):677-8. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg042.
10. Wittig U, Kania R, Golebiewski M, Rey M, Shi L, Jong L, et al. SABIO-RK-database for biochemical reaction kinetics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):790-6. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1046.
11. Weber M, Henkel SG, Vlaic S, Guthke R, van Zoelen EJ, Driesch D. Inference of dynamical gene-regulatory networks based on time-resolved multi-stimuli multi-experiment data applying NetGenerator V2.0. BMC Syst Biol. 2013;7(1):1. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-7-1.
12. Vlaic S, Hoffmann B, Kupfer P, Weber M, Dräger A. GRN2SBML: Automated encoding and annotation of inferred gene regulatory networks complying with SBML. Bioinforma. 2013;29(17):2216-217. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt370.
13. Krumsiek J, Pölsterl S, Wittmann DM, Theis FJS. Odefy-from discrete to continuous models. BMC Bioinforma. 2010;11:233. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-233.
14. Hill AV. The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves. J Physiol. 1910;40(4):iv-vii.
15. Dräger A, Palsson BØ. Improving collaboration by standardization efforts in systems biology. Front Bioeng. 2014;2(61). doi:10.3389/fbioe.2014.00061.
16. Liebermeister W, Klipp E. Bringing metabolic networks to life: convenience rate law and thermodynamic constraints. Theor Biol Med Model. 2006;3(42):41. doi:10.1186/1742-4682-3-41.
17. Hucka M, Finney A, Bornstein BJ, Keating SM, Shapiro BE, Matthews J, et al. Evolving a lingua franca and associated software infrastructure for computational systems biology: the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) project. Syst Biol IEE. 2004;1(1):41-53.
18. Dräger A, Rodriguez N, Dumousseau M, Dörr A, Wrzodek C, Le Novère N, et al. JSBML: a flexible Java library for working with SBML. Bioinforma. 2011;27(15):2167-168. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr361. http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/27/15/2167.full.pdf+ html.
19. Rodriguez N, Thomas A, Watanabe L, Vazirabad IY, Kofia V, Gómez HF, et al. JSBML 1.0: providing a smorgasbord of options to encode systems biology models. Bioinforma. 2015. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv341. http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/06/30/bioinformatics.btv341.
20. Bornstein BJ, Keating SM, Jouraku A, Hucka M. LibSBML: an API library for SBML. Bioinforma. 2008;24(6):880-1. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn051.
21. Funahashi A, Matsuoka Y, Jouraku A, Morohashi M, Kikuchi N, Kitano H. CellDesigner 3.5: A Versatile Modeling Tool for Biochemical Networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE. IEEE; 2008 vol 96: p. 1254-1265.
22. Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J, Team G. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 2010;11(8):86. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86.
23. Dräger A, Planatscher H, Wouamba DM, Schröder A, Hucka M, Endler L, et al. SBML2LATEX: Conversion of SBML files into human-readable reports. Bioinforma. 2009;25(11):1455-1456. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp170. http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/11/1455.full.pdf+ html.
24. Ghosh S, Matsuoka Y, Asai Y, Hsin KY, Kitano H. Software for systems biology: from tools to integrated platforms. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(12): 821-32.
25. Courtot M, Juty N, Knüpfer C, Waltemath D, Zhukova A, Dräger A, et al. Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:543. doi:10.1038/msb.2011.77.
26. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27-30. doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.27 http://nar. oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/28/1/27.pdf.
27. Le Novère N, Finney A, Hucka M, Bhalla US, Campagne F, Collado-Vides J, et al. Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM). Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(12):1509-1515. doi:10.1038/nbt1156.
28. Le Novère N, Hucka M, Mi H, Moodie S, Schreiber F, Sorokin A, et al. The Systems Biology Graphical Notation. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(8):735-41. doi:10.1038/nbt0909-864d.
29. Guldberg CM, Waage P. über die chemische affinität. Journal für Practische Chemie. 1879;127:69-114.
30. Heinrich R, Schuster S. The Regulation of Cellular Systems. New York, NY, USA: Chapman and Hall; 1996.
31. Hucka M, Bergmann FT, Hoops S, Keating SM, Sahle S, SchaffJC, et al. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML): Language Specification for Level 3 Version 1 Core. J Integr Bioinforma. 2015;12(2):266. doi:10.23 90/biecoll-jib-2015-266.
32. Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, Bolouri H, Doyle JC, Kitano H, et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinforma. 2003;19(4): 524-31. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg015.
33. Dräger A, Planatscher H. Metabolic In: Dubitzky W, Wolkenhauer O, Yokota H, Cho K-H, editors. Metabolic. Networks. Springer New York Heidelberg Dorodrecht London: Springer; 2013. p. 1249-1251. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_1277. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_100849.
34. Dräger A, Planatscher H. Parameter. In: Dubitzky W, Wolkenhauer O, Yokota H, Cho K-H, editors. Parameter Estimation, Metabolic Network Modeling. Springer New York Heidelberg Dorodrecht London: Springer; 2013 p. 1627-1631. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_1174. http://link. springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_1174.
35. Liebermeister W, Uhlendorf J, Klipp E. Modular rate laws for enzymatic reactions: thermodynamics, elasticities and implementation. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(12):1528-1534. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq141, http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals. org/content/26/12/1528.abstract.
36. Laible C, Le Novère N. MIRIAM Resources: tools to generate and resolve robust cross-references in Systems Biology. BMC Systems Biology. 2007;13(58):58-67. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-1-58.
37. Juty N, Le Novère N, Laibe C. Identifiers.org and MIRIAM Registry: community resources to provide persistent identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(D1):580-6.
38. Juty N, Laibe C, Le Novère N. Controlled annotations for systems biology In: Schneider MV, editor. In Silico Systems Biology. Springer; 2013. p. 227-45. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-450-0_12, http://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-62703-450-0_12.
39. Hucka M, Bergmann FT, Dräger A, Hoops S, Keating SM, Le Novère N, et al. Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Level 2 Version 5: Structures and Facilities for Model Definitions. J Integr Bioinforma. 2015;12(2):271. doi:10.2390/biecoll-jib-2015-271.
40. Dräger A, Hassis N, Supper J, Schröder A, Zell A. SBMLsqueezer: a CellDesigner plug-in to generate kinetic rate equations for biochemical networks. BMC Syst Biol. 2008;2(1):39. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-2-39.
41. Dräger A, Schröder A, Zell A. Automating mathematical modeling of biochemical reaction networks. In: Systems Biology for Signaling Networks. New York: Springer; 2010. vol. 2. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5797-9_7, http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007 %2F978-1-4419-5797-9_7.
42. Hinze T, Hayat S, Lenser T, Matsumaru N, Dittrich P. Hill Kinetics meets P Systems: A Case Study on Gene Regulatory Networks as Computing Agents in silico and in vivo In: Eleftherakis G, Kefalas P, Paun G, editors. Proceedings of the Eight Workshop on Membrane Computing. SEERC. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. p. 363-81. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-77312-2_20, http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007 %2F978-3-540-77312-2_20.
43. Radde N. Modeling Non-Linear Dynamic Phenomena in Biochemical Networks. PhD thesis, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences. Germany: University of Cologne; January 2007. http://kups.ub.uni-koeln. de/volltexte/2008/2221/.
44. Radde N, Kaderali L. Bayesian Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks Using Gene Expression Time Series Data In: Hochreiter S, Wagner R, editors. Bioinformatics Research and Development. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. vol. 4414. p. 1-15. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71233-6_1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71233-6_1.
45. D'haeseleer P, Liang S, Somogyi R. Gene Expression Data Analysis and Modeling. In: Tutorial Notes from Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Hawaii, USA; 1999.
46. Töpfer S, Guthke R, Driesch D, Wötzel D, PfaffM. The NetGenerator Algorithm: reconstruction of gene regulatory networks. In: Tuyls K, Westra R, Saeys Y, Nowé A, editors. Knowledge Discovery and Emergent Complexity in Bioinformatics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 2007. vol. 4366. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71037-0_8 http://www.springerlink. com/content/f0u6757h2186075x/.
47. Vohradskỳ J. Neural network model of gene expression. FASEB Journal. 2001;15(3):846-54. doi:10.1096/fj.00-0361com. http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/reprint/15/3/846.pdf.
48. Vu TT, Vohradskỳ J. Nonlinear differential equation model for quantification of transcriptional regulation applied to microarray data of saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(1):279-87. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl1001.
49. Weaver DC, Workman CT, Stormo GD. Modeling regulatory networks with weight matrices. In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing World Scientific Publishing. Scientific Publishing; 1999. p. 112-23. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10380190.
50. Savageau MA. Biochemical systems analysis. I. Some mathematical properties of the rate law for the component enzymatic reactions. J Theor Biol. 1969;25(3):365-9.
51. Spieth C, Hassis N, Streichert F, Supper J, Beyreuther K, Zell A. Comparing Mathematical Models on the Problem of Network Inference. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. GECCO '06. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2006. p. 279-86. doi:10.1145/1143997.1144045. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143997.1144045.
52. Schellenberger J, Park JO, Conrad TM, Palsson BO. BiGG: a Biochemical Genetic and Genomic knowledgebase of large scale metabolic reconstructions. BMC bioinformatics. 2010;11:213. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-213.
53. Wrzodek C, Dräger A, Zell A. KEGGtranslator: visualizing and converting the KEGG PATHWAY database to various formats. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(16):2314-315. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr377.
54. Wrzodek C, Büchel F, RuffM, Dräger A, Zell A. Precise generation of systems biology models from KEGG pathways. BMC Systems Biology. 2013;7(1):15. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-7-15.
55. Keller R, Dörr A, Tabira A, Funahashi A, Ziller MJ, Adams R, Rodriguez N, Le Novère N, Hiroi N, Planatscher H, Zell A, Dräger A. The systems biology simulation core algorithm. BMC Syst Biol. 2013;7(1):55. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-7-55.
56. Dörr A, Keller R, Zell A, Dräger A. SBMLsimulator: a Java tool for model simulation and parameter estimation in systems biology. Computation. 2014;2(4):246-57. doi:10.3390/computation2040246.
57. Chaouiya C, Bérenguier D, Keating SM, Naldi A, van Iersel MP, Rodriguez N, et al. SBML qualitative models: a model representation format and infrastructure to foster interactions between qualitative modelling formalisms and tools. BMC Systems Biology. 2013;7:135. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-7-135. 1309.1910.
58. Chaouiya C, Keating SM, Berenguier D, Naldi A, Thieffry D, van Iersel MP, et al. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Level 3 Package: Qualitative Models, Version 1, Release 1. Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics. 2015;12(2):270. doi:10.2390/biecoll-jib-2015-270.
59. Endler L, Rodriguez N, Juty N, Chelliah V, Laibe C, Li C, Le Novère N. Designing and encoding models for synthetic biology. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2009;6(Suppl 4):405-17. doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0176.focus.
60. Autiero I, Costantini S, Colonna G. Modeling of the bacterial mechanism of methicillin-resistance by a systems biology approach. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):6226. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006226.
61. Dolan D, Nelson G, Zupanic A, Smith G, Shanley D. Systems Modelling of NHEJ Reveals the Importance of Redox Regulation of Ku70/80 in the Dynamics of DNA Damage Foci. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):55190. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055190.
62. Lecca P, Priami C. Biological network inference for drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today. 2013;18(5-6):256-64. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2012.11.001.
63. Gupta MK. Metabolic Modeling and Simulation Analysis of Thyroid Disorder Pathway. JCSB. 2012;05(02):52-61. doi:10.4172/jcsb.1000090.
64. Gupta MK, Misra K. Modeling and simulation analysis of propyl-thiouracil (PTU), an anti-thyroid drug on thyroid peroxidase (TPO), thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR), and sodium iodide (NIS) symporter based on systems biology approach. Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics. 2013;2(1):45-57. doi:10.1007/s13721-013-0023-0.
65. Pathak RK, Taj G, Pandey D, Arora S, Kumar A. Modeling of the MAPK machinery activation in response to various abiotic and biotic stresses in plants by a system biology approach. Bioinformation. 2013;9(9):443-9. doi:10.6026/97320630009443.
66. Büchel F, Rodriguez N, Swainston N, Wrzodek C, Czauderna T, Keller R, et al. Large-scale generation of computational models from biochemical pathway maps. BMC Syst Biol. 2013;7(1):116. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-7-116.
67. Dräger A. Computational modeling of biochemical networks. PhD thesis, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany (January 2011). http://www. dr.hut-verlag.de/978-3-86853-850-2.html.
68. Blum T. Computational approaches for analyzing metabolic pathways. PhD thesis, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany:July 2009 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-opus-41532.
69. Orth JD, Conrad TM, Na J, Lerman JA, Nam H, Feist AM, et al. A comprehensive genome-scale reconstruction of Escherichia coli metabolism-2011. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7(1):535. doi:10.1038/msb.2011.65.
70. Cornish-Bowden A. Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics, 3rd edn. 59 Portland Place, London, United Kingdom: Portland Press Ltd; 2004.
71. Michaelis L, Menten ML. Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. Biochem Z. 1913;49: 333-69.
72. Segel IH. Enzyme Kinetics-Behavior and Analysis of Rapid Equilibrium and Steady-State Enzyme Systems. New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Intersciennce; 1993.
73. Bisswanger H. Enzymkinetik-Theorie und Methoden, 3rd edn. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH; 2000.
74. Tournier L. Approximation of dynamical systems using s-systems theory: application to biological systems. In: ISSAC '05: Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation. New York, NY, USA: ACM press; 2005. p. 317-24. doi:10.1145/1073884.1073928. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1073884.1073928.
75. Spieth C, Streichert F, Speer N, Zell A. Optimizing Topology and Parameters of Gene Regulatory Network Models from Time-Series Experiments. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2004). LNCS; 2004. p. 461-70.
76. Hecker M, Lambeck S, Töpfer S, Someren EV, Guthke R. Gene regulatory network inference: data integration in dynamic models-a review. Biosystems. 2009;96(1):86-103. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.12.004.
77. Arnold A, Nikoloski Z. A quantitative comparison of calvin-benson cycle models. Trends Plant Sci. 2011;16(12):676-83. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.09.004.