A quantitative comparison of Calvin-Benson cycle models

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 676-683

  Arnold, Anne ^a,b   Nikoloski, Zoran ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PLANT PHYSIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; METABOLOMICS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT; REVIEW;

METABOLOMICS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANTS;

EID: 83055187942     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.09.004     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Nedbal L., et al. Scaling and integration of kinetic models of photosynthesis: towards comprehensive e-photosynthesis. Photosynthesis In Silico 2009, 17-29. Springer. A. Laisk (Ed.).
2. Zhu X.-G., et al. Optimizing the distribution of resources between enzymes of carbon metabolism can dramatically increase photosynthetic rate: a numerical simulation using an evolutionary algorithm. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145:513-526.
3. Bar-Even A., et al. Design and analysis of synthetic carbon fixation pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:8889-8894.
4. 4 photosynthesis from gas exchange. BioSystems 2011, 103:265-284.
5. Calvin M. Chemical and photochemical reactions of thioctic acid and related disulfides. Federation Proc. 1954, 13:697-711.
6. Ogren W.L., Bowes G. Ribulose diphosphate carboxylase regulates soybean photorespiration. Nat. New Biol. 1971, 230:159-160.
7. 3 photosynthesis in silico. Photosynth. Res. 2006, 90:45-66.
8. 2 fixation as an example for general control mechanisms in metabolic cycles. BioSystems 1999, 51:79-93.
9. Laisk A., et al. A mathematical model of carbon metabolism in photosynthesis: difficulties in explaining oscillations by fructose 2,6-bisphosphate regulation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 1989, 237:389-415.
10. Pettersson G., Ryde-Pettersson U. A mathematical model of the Calvin photosynthesis cycle. Eur. J. Biochem. 1988, 175:661-672.
11. Poolman M.G., et al. Modelling photosynthesis and its control. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51:319-328.
12. 3 photosynthesis: a sensitivity analysis of the photosynthetic carbon-reduction cycle. Planta 1993, 191:421-432.
13. Giersch C. A kinetic model for translocators in the chloroplast envelope as an element of computer simulation of the dark reaction of photosynthesis. Z. Naturforsch. 1977, 32c:263-270.
14. Heldt H.W., et al. Phosphate requirement for the light activation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase in intact spinach chloroplasts. FEBS Lett. 1978, 92:234-240.
15. Stitt M., et al. Regulation of sucrose synthesis by cytoplasmic fructosebisphosphatase and sucrose phosphate synthase during photosynthesis in varying light and carbon dioxide. Plant Physiol. 1983, 72:767-774.
16. Wirtz W., et al. Light activation of Calvin cycle enzymes as measured in pea leaves. FEBS Lett. 1982, 142:223-226.
17. 2 and temperature on a high-affinity form of ribulose diphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase from spinach. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1974, 60:204-210.
18. Preiss J., et al. Regulation of the biosynthesis of starch in spinach leaf chloroplasts. Biochemistry of Chloroplasts 1967, 131-153. Academic Press. T.W. Goodwin (Ed.).
19. Preiss J., Kosuge T. Regulation of enzyme activity in photosynthetic system. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1970, 21:433-466.
20. Heldt H.W., et al. Role of orthophosphate and other factors in the regulation of starch formation in leaves and isolated chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 1977, 59:1146-1155.
21. Preiss J. Regulation of the biosynthesis and degradation of starch. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1982, 33:431-454.
22. 2+ concentration. Planta 1986, 168:536-545.
23. Naula C., et al. A new erythrose 4-phosphate dehydrogenase coupled assay for transketolase. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2008, 70:1185-1187.
24. Damour G., Urban L. Models of photosynthesis need to and can be upgraded to include the effects of drought, phenological changes, sink activity and carbohydrate accumulation on the light exposure/photosynthetic capacity relationship. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models 2007.
25. 3 species. Planta 1980, 149:78-90.
26. 2 fixation. Photosynth. Res. 1990, 24:151-165.
27. Hahn B.D. A mathematical model of the Calvin cycle: analysis of the steady state. Ann. Bot. 1986, 57:639-653.
28. Medlyn B.E., et al. Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25:1167-1179.
29. Schultz H.R. Extension of a Farquhar model for limitations of leaf photosynthesis induced by light environment, phenology and leaf age in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cvv. White Riesling and Zinfandel). Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30:673-687.
30. 3 leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30:1035-1040.
31. Zhu X.-G., et al. A simple model of the Calvin cycle has only one physiologically feasible steady state under the same external conditions. Nonlin. Anal. Real World Appl. 2009, 10:1490-1499.
32. Grimbs S., et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of the Calvin cycle: multistationarity and symmetry breaking instabilities. BioSystems 2011, 103:212-223.
33. 3 plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1988, 39:533-594.
34. 2 in NADP-malic enzyme type species. Photosynth. Res. 2000, 66:199-224.
35. Poolman M.G. Computer Modelling Applied to the Calvin Cycle 1999, Oxford Brookes University.
36. Anderson L.E. Chloroplast and cytoplasmic enzymes III. Pea leaf ribose 5-phosphate isomerases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Enzymol. 1971, 235:245-249.
37. Bernacchi C.J., et al. Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24:253-259.
38. Fridlyand L., et al. Homeostatic regulation upon changes of enzyme activities in the Calvin cycle as an example for general mechanisms of flux control. What can we expect from transgenic plants?. Photosynth. Res. 1999, 61:227-239.
39. 2. Plant Cell Environ. 1992, 15:271-282.
40. Leegood R.C. Enzymes of the Calvin cycle. Methods in Plant Biochemistry 1990, 15-38. Academic Press. P.A. Lea (Ed.).
41. Urban L., Alphonsout L. Girdling decreases photosynthetic electron fluxes and induces sustained photoprotection in mango leaves. Tree Physiol. 2007, 27:345-352.
42. Urban L., et al. A biochemical model of photosynthesis for mango leaves: evidence for the effect of fruit on photosynthetic capacity of nearby leaves. Tree Physiol. 2003, 23:289-300.
43. Arrivault S., et al. Use of reverse-phase liquid chromatography, linked to tandem mass spectrometry, to profile the Calvin cycle and other metabolic intermediates in Arabidopsis rosettes at different carbon dioxide concentrations. Plant J. 2009, 59:826-839.
44. Gerhardt R., et al. Subcellular metabolite levels in spinach leaves. Plant Physiol. 1987, 83:399-407.
45. Stitt M., et al. Adenine nucleotide levels in the cytosol, chloroplasts, and mitochondria of wheat leaf protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 1982, 70:971-977.
46. Winter H., et al. Subcellular volumes and metabolite concentrations in spinach leaves. Planta 1994, 193:530-535.
47. Bassham J.A., Krause G.H. Free energy changes and metabolic regulation in steady-state photosynthetic carbon reduction. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1969, 189:207-221.
48. Heinrich R., Schuster S. Metabolic control analysis. The Regulation of Cellular Systems 1996, Chapman and Hall, pp. 138-291.
49. Abdi H., Salkind N.J. Kendall rank correlation. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics 2007, Sage Publications.
50. Vemuri G.N., Aristidou A.A. Metabolic Engineering in the -omics era: elucidating and modulating regulatory networks. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2005, 69:197-216.