Participation in physical play and leisure in children with motor impairments: Mixed-methods study to generate evidence for developing an intervention

Physical Therapy

Volumn 95, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1374-1386

  Kolehmainen, Niina ^a   Ramsay, Craig ^b   McKee, Lorna ^b   Missiuna, Cheryl ^c   Owen, Christine ^d   Francis, Jill ^e  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d NHS LOTHIAN   (United Kingdom)

^e CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHILD; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR DISORDERS; PARENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECREATION; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TIME FACTOR; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; CHILD; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR DISORDERS; PARENTS; PLAY AND PLAYTHINGS; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84943279624     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20140404     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Zwicker J, Harris S, Klassen A. Quality of life domains affected in children with developmental coordination disorder: a systematic review. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39:562-580.
2. Powrie B, Kolehmainen N, Turpin M, et al. The meaning of leisure for children and young people with physical disabilities: a systematic evidence synthesis of qualitative studies. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 May 4 [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12788.
3. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health—Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007.
4. Poulsen A, Ziviani JM, Johnson H, Cuskelly M. Loneliness and life satisfaction of boys with developmental coordination disorder: the impact of leisure participation and perceived freedom in leisure. Hum Mov Sci. 2008;27:325-343.
5. Cantell M, Crawford S, Doyle-Parker P. Physical fitness and health indices in children, adolescents and adults with high or low motor competence. Hum Mov Sci. 2008;27:344-362.
6. Novak I, McIntyre S, Morgan C, et al. A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: state of the evidence. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55: 885-910.
7. Martin L, Baker R, Harvey A. A systematic review of common physiotherapy interventions in school-aged children with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2010;30:294-312.
8. Gillis L, Tomkinson G, Olds T, et al. Research priorities for child and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviours: an international perspective using a twin-panel Delphi procedure. Int J Behav NutrPhysAct. 2013;10:112.
9. A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health. London, United Kingdom: Medical Research Council; 2000.
10. Craig P, Dieppe P, MacInture S, et al. Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. London, United Kingdom: Medical Research Council; 2008.
11. Green D, Lingam R, Mattocks C, et al. The risk of reduced physical activity in children with probable developmental coordination disorder: a prospective longitudinal study. Res Dev Disabil. 2010;32:1332-1342.
12. Palisano R, Orlin M, Chiarello L, et al. Determinants of intensity of participation in leisure and recreational activities by youth with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1468-1476.
13. Van Wely L, Becher J, Balemans A, Dallmeijer A. Ambulatory activity of children with cerebral palsy: which characteristics are important? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54:436-442.
14. Longo E, Badia M, Orgaz B. Patterns and predictors of participation in leisure activities outside of school in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:266-275.
15. Bjornson KF, Zhou C, Stevenson R, Christakis DA. Capacity to participation in cerebral palsy: evidence of an indirect path via performance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:2365-2372.
16. Fisher A, Reilly JJ, Kelly LA, et al. Fundamental movement skills and habitual physical activity in young children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:684-688.
17. Ziviani J, Poulsen A, Hansen C. Movement skills proficiency and physical activity: a case for Engaging and Coaching for Health (EACH)—Child. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009; 56:259-265.
18. Colver A, Thyen U, Arnaud C, et al. Association between participation in life situations of children with cerebral palsy and their physical, social, and attitudinal environment: a cross-sectional multicenter European study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:2154-2164.
19. Fisher K, Johnston M. Experimental manipulation of perceived control and its effects on disability. Psychol Health. 1996; 11:657-669.
20. Johnston M, Bonetti D, Joice S, et al. Recovery from disability after stroke as a target for a behavioural intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1117-1127.
21. Law M, Finkelman S, Hurley P, et al. Participation of children with physical disabilities: relationships with diagnosis, physical function and demographic variables. Scand J Rehabil. 2004;11:156-162.
22. Kolehmainen N, Francis JJ, Ramsay CR, et al. Participation in physical play and leisure: developing a theory- and evidence-based intervention for children with motor impairments. BMC Pediatr. 2011; 11:100.
23. World Health Organization. Physical activity. Updated February 2014. Available at: http://www.who.int/topics/physical_activity/en/. Accessed May 21, 2015.
24. Perrin EC, Newacheck P, Pless IB, et al. Issues involved in the definition and classification of chronic health conditions. Pediatrics. 1993;91:787-793.
25. Stein R, Jessop D. A noncategorical approach to chronic childhood illness. Public Health Rep. 1982;97:354-362.
26. King G, Law M, King S, et al. The Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and the Preferences for Activities ofChildren (PAC). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment Inc; 2005.
27. Fishbein M. Attitude and the prediction of behaviour. In: Fishbein M, ed. Readingsin Attitude Theory and Measurement. New York, NY: Wiley; 1967:477-492.
28. Thomas N, O’Kane C. The ethics of participatory research with children. Children & Society. 1998;12:336-348.
29. Kolehmainen N, MacLennan G, Francis JJ, Duncan EA. Clinicians’ caseload management behaviours as explanatory factors in patients’ length of time on caseloads: a predictive multilevel study in paediatric community occupational therapy. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:249.
30. Godin G, Kok G. The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am JHealth Promot. 1996;11:87-98.
31. Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, et al. Constructing Questionnaires Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Manual for Health Services Researchers. Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom: Centre for Health Services Research; 2004.
32. Miles MB, Huberman AA. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 1994.
33. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3: 77-101.
34. Gibbs GR. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications Inc; 2007.
35. Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2003.
36. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:205-210.
37. Geyh S, Peter C, Muller R, et al. The personal factors of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in the literature: a systematic review and content analysis. Disabil Reha-bil. 2011;33:1089-1102.
38. Hoenig JM, Heisey DM. The abuse of power: the pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. Am Stat. 2001;55: 19-24.
39. Colegrave N, Ruxton G. Confidence intervals are a more useful complement to nonsignificant tests than are power calculations. Behav Ecol. 2003;14:446-450.
40. Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1989;11:255-274.
41. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2001.
42. Lincoln YS, Guba EA. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1985.
43. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivar-iate Statistics. 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
44. Majnemer A, Shevell M, Law M, et al. Participation and enjoyment of leisure activities in school-aged children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50: 751-758.
45. Shikako-Thomas K, Majnemer A, Law M, Lach L. Determinants of participation in leisure activities in children and youth with cerebral palsy: systematic review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2008;28:155-169.
46. Rhodes RE, Dickau L. Experimental evidence for the intention-behavior relationship in the physical activity domain: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2012;31: 724-727.
47. Sniehotta F. Towards a theory of intentional behaviour change: plans, planning and self-regulation. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14:261-273.
48. Greaves CJ, Sheppard KE, Abraham C, et al. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:119.