Evaluating team performance at the edge of Chaos

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3020, Issue , 2004, Pages 89-101

  Prokopenko, Mikhail ^a   Wang, Peter ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION THEORY; SPORTS;

EDGE OF CHAOS; MULTI-AGENT COORDINATIONS; MULTIPLE LEVELS; QUANTITATIVE FRAMEWORKS; QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION; TEAM DECISION; TEAM PERFORMANCE;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84943254762     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25940-4_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Tucker Balch. Hierarchic Social Entropy: An Information Theoretic Measure of Robot Team Diversity. Autonomous Robots, vol. 8, no. 3, July, 2000.
2. Marc Butler, Mikhail Prokopenko and Thomas Howard. Flexible Synchronisation within RoboCup Environment: a Comparative Analysis. In P. Stone, T. Balch, G. Kraetzschmar (eds.). RoboCup-2000: Robot Soccer World Cup IV, LNCS 2019, Springer, 2001.
3. Yunpeng Cai, Jiang Chen, Jinyi Yao, Shi Li. Global Planning from Local Eyeshot: An Implementation of Observation-Based Plan Coordination in RoboCup Simulation Games. In A. Birk, S. Coradeschi, S. Tadokoro (eds.). RoboCup 2001: Robot Soccer World Cup V, LNCS 2377, Springer 2002.
4. Hiroaki Kitano, Milind Tambe, Peter Stone, Manuela M. Veloso, Silvia Coradeschi, Eiichi Osawa, Hitoshi Matsubara, Itsuki Noda and Minoru Asada. The RoboCup Synthetic Agent Challenge. In Proceedings of the 15th Int'l Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1997.
5. Peter N. Kugler and Michael T. Turvey. Information, Natural Law, and the Self-Assembly of Rhythmic Movement. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987.
6. Christopher Langton. Computation at the Edge of Chaos: Phase Transitions and Emergent Computation. In S. Forest (ed.), Emergent Computation, MIT, 1991.
7. Octavio Miramontes. Order-Disorder Transitions in the Behavior of Ant societies. Complexity, Vol. 1, no. 3, 56-60, 1995.
8. H. Van Dyke Parunak and Sven Brueckner. Entropy and self-organization in multi-agent systems. In Proc. of the 5th Int'l Conference on Autonomous agents, Montreal, 2001.
9. Daniel Polani, Jan T. Kim and Thomas Martinetz. An Information-Theoretic Approach for the Quantification of Relevance. In J. Kelemen and P. Sosik (eds.), Advances in Artificial Life, Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Artificial Life, Prague, Springer 2001.
10. Mikhail Prokopenko and Peter Wang. Relating the Entropy of Joint Beliefs to Multi-Agent Coordination. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on RoboCup, 2002.
11. David V. Pynadath, Milind Tambe. Multiagent teamwork: analyzing the optimality and complexity of key theories and models. In the Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2002, Bologna, 2002.
12. Taylor Raines, Milind Tambe, Stacy Marsella. Automated assistants to aid humans in understanding team behaviors. In the Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Barcelona, 2000.
13. Patrick Riley, Manuela Veloso, Gal Kaminka. An Empirical Study of Coaching. In H. Asama, T. Arai, T. Fukuda, and T. Hasegawa (eds.), Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems 5, Springer-Verlag, 2002.
14. Claude E. Shannon and Warren Weaver. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, 1949.
15. Peter Stone and Manuela Veloso. Task Decomposition, Dynamic Role Assignment, and Low-Bandwidth Communication for Real-Time Strategic Teamwork. In Artificial Intelligence, vol. 110, no. 2, June 1999.
16. Stephen Wolfram. Universality and Complexity in Cellular Automata. Physica D, 10 (January 1984), 1-35, 1984.
17. Andrew Wuensche. Classifying Cellular Automata Automatically: Finding gliders, filtering, and relating space-time patterns, attractor basins, and the Z parameter. Complexity, Vol. 4, no. 3, 47-66, 1999.