UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support

Applied Energy

Volumn 160, Issue , 2015, Pages 419-430

  Whitmarsh, Lorraine ^a   Nash, Nick ^a   Upham, Paul ^b   Lloyd, Alyson ^c   Verdon, James P ^d   Kendall, J Michael ^d  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LEUPHANA UNIVERSITY OF LÜNEBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Communication; Hydraulic fracturing; Public; Risk perceptions; Shale gas

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; GASES; HYDRAULIC FRACTURING; PUBLIC RISKS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; SHALE GAS; SURVEYS;

ATTITUDES; CONTEXTUAL FACTORS; ECONOMIC INFORMATION; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; EXPERIMENTAL SURVEY; PUBLIC; PUBLIC ATTITUDES; PUBLIC PERCEPTION;

SHALE;

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; HYDRAULIC FRACTURE; NATURAL GAS; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; RECOGNITION; RISK PERCEPTION; SHALE;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84943251131     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. DECC. Delivering UK energy investment; 2014b. [accessed 11.01.15]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/331071/DECC_Energy_Investment_Report.pdf.
2. DECC. Gas generation strategy. London: Department of Energy and Climate Change; 2012. [accessed 15.12.14]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/65654/7165-gas-generation-strategy.pdf.
3. Rathbone P., Bass R. Unconventional gas: The potential impact on UK gas prices 2012, Navigant Consulting (Europe) Ltd., London.
4. Taylor C., Lewis D. Getting shale gas working. Infrastructure for business series 6 2013, Institute of Directors, London.
5. Bradshaw M., Bridge G., Bouzarovski S., Watson J., Dutton J. The UK's global gas challenge - research report 2014, UKERC, London.
6. Friends of the earth. Shale gas: not all it's fracked up to be. Briefing note; November 2013. [accessed 15.12.14]. http://www.foe.co.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/shale-gas-not-all-its-fracked-be-18119.pdf.
7. Royal Society Shale gas extraction in the UK: a review of hydraulic fracturing 2012, The Royal Society, London.
8. Kibble A., Cabianca T., Daraktchieva Z., Gooding T., Smithard J., Kowalczyk G., et al. Review of the potential public health impacts of exposures to chemical and radioactive pollutants as a result of the shale gas extraction process. Publ Health Engl PHE-CRCE-009 2012.
9. IEA. Golden rules for a golden age of gas: WEO special report. International Energy Agency; 2012. [accessed 15.12.14]. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2012/goldenrules/WEO2012_GoldenRulesReport.pdf.
10. Harvey F. Protesters attempt to set up coalition against fracking. The Guardian, 16th March; 2012. [accessed 11.01.15]. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/mar/16/protesters-coalition-against-fracking.
11. O'Hara S, Humphrey M, Andersson J, Jaspal R, Nerlich B, Knight W. Public perception of shale gas extraction in the UK: has balcombe bottomed out?; 2014. [accessed 11.01.15]. http://www.scribd.com/doc/131787519/public-perceptions-of-shale-gas-in-the-UK-September-2014-pdf.
12. Whitmarsh L., Upham P., Poortinga W., Darnton A., McLachlan C., Devine-Wright P., et al. Public attitudes to low-carbon energy - research synthesis. RCUK 2011, http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/energy/EnergySynthesisFINAL20110124.pdf [accessed 11.01.15].
13. Bakshi V., Casgrain M. Shale gas and other unconventional resources: a practitioners guide 2012, Globe Business Publishing Ltd., London.
14. Fiorino D.J. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum Values 1990, 15:226-243.
15. DECC. DECC public attitudes tracker - wave 10; 2014a. [accessed 11.01.15]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/342426/Wave_10_findings_of_DECC_Public_Attitudes_Tracker_FINAL.pdf.
16. Parkhill K.A., Demski C., Butler C., Spence A., Pidgeon N. Transforming the UK energy system: public values, attitudes and acceptability - synthesis report 2013, UKERC, London.
17. Curry TE, Reiner RE, de Figueiredo MA, Herzog HJ. A survey of public attitudes towards energy & environment in Great Britain. MIT LFEE 2005-001 WP; 2005. http://lfee.mit.edu/publications/.
18. Shackley S, Reiche A, Mander S. The public perceptions of underground coal gasification (UCG): a pilot study. Tyndall Centre Working Paper 57; 2004. http://www.tyndall.ac.uk.
19. Jaspal R., Nerlich B. Fracking in the UK press: threat dynamics in an unfolding debate. Publ Underst Sci 2014, 23:348-363.
20. Theodori G.L. Paradoxical perceptions of problems associated with unconventional natural gas development. Southern Rural Sociol 2009, 24:97-117.
21. Groat CG, Grimshaw TW. Fact-based regulation for environmental protection in shale gas development. Austin, Texas: The Energy Institute; 2012. Available from: [accessed 11.01.15]. http://www.velaw.com/UploadedFiles/VEsite/Resources/ei_shale_gas_reg_summary1202[1].pdf.
22. O'Hara S, Humphrey M, Jaspal R, Nerlich B, Poberezhskaya M. Shale gas in the UK: what the people think; 2012. [accessed 15.12.14]. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/news/pressreleases/2012/july/fracking.aspx.
23. Boudet H., Clarke C., Bugden D., Maibach E., Roser-Renouf C., Leiserowitz A. "Fracking" controversy and communication: using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy 2014, 65:57-67.
24. Wynne B. Knowledges in context. Sci Technol Hum Values 1991, 16:111-121.
25. Slovic P. The perception of risk 2000, Earthscan, London.
26. 2 storage sites: lessons from five European cases. Energy Environ 2012, 23:227-248.
27. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion 1986, Academic Press, New York.
28. Scheufele D.A. Framing as a theory of media effects. J Commun 1999, 49:103-122.
29. UKOOG. Energy attitudes survey; 2014. [accessed 11.01.15]. http://www.populus.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/UKOOG1.pdf.
30. Devine-Wright P., Howes Y. Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: a wind energy case study. J Environ Psychol 2010, 30:271-280.
31. Walker G., Devine-Wright P., Hunter S., High H., Evans B. Trust and community: exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy 2010, 38:2655-2663.
32. Resources for the Future. Would you pay to reduce risks from shale gas development?; 2014. [accessed 01.06.15]. http://www.rff.org/Publications/Resources/Pages/185-Paying-for-Shale-Gas-Risks.aspx.
33. Natural Gas Europe. Just say Nimby; 2012. [accessed 01.06.15]. http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/public-opposition-energy-projects-europe.
34. Venables D., Pidgeon N.F., Parkhill K.A., Henwood K.L., Simmons P. Living with nuclear power: sense of place, proximity, and risk perceptions in local host communities. J Environ Psychol 2012, 32:371-383.
35. Evans G., Durant J. The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Publ Underst Sci 1995, 4:57-74.
36. Lord C.G., Ross L., Lepper M.R. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 1979, 37:2098-2109.
37. TNS. Public engagement with shale gas and oil. A report on findings from public dialogue workshops; 2014. [accessed 01.06.15]. http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Publicengagementwithshalegasandoil.pdf.
38. Corner A., Whitmarsh L., Xenias D. Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change: biased assimilation and attitude polarisation. Clim Change 2012, 114:463-478.
39. Mayer N.D., Tormala Z.L. 'Think' versus 'feel' framing effects in persuasion. Pers Soc Psychol B 2010, 36:443-454.
40. Raymond C.M., Brown G., Weber D. The measurement of place attachment: personal, community, and environmental connections. J Environ Psychol 2010, 30:422-434.
41. Paranjothy S., Gallacher J., Amlot R., Rubin G.J., Page L., Baxter T., et al. Psychosocial impact of the summer 2007 flood in England. BMC Publ Health 2011, 11(145).
42. Whitmarsh L., O'Neill S. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. J Environ Psychol 2010, 30:305-314.
43. Corner A., Pidgeon N. Geoengineering, climate change scepticism and the 'moral hazard' argument: an experimental study of UK public perceptions. Philos Trans R Soc A 2014, 372(2031).
44. Poortinga W., Pidgeon N. Public perceptions of risk, science and governance: main findings of a British survey of five risk cases 2003, University of East Anglia and MORI, Norwich.
45. Priester J.R., Petty R.E. The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996, 71:341-449.
46. BGS Shale and clay units in England and Wales. Brit Geol Surv 2014, http://www.bgs.ac.uk/research/groundwater/shaleGas/aquifersAndShales/maps/nationaloverview.html [accessed 11.01.15].
47. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263.
48. Leviston Z., Walker I., Morwinski S. Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nat Clim Change 2013, 3:334-337.
49. Maio G.R., Bell D.W., Esses V.M. Ambivalence and persuasion: the processing of messages about immigrant groups. J Exp Soc Psychol 1996, 32:513-536.
50. Whitmarsh L. Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: dimensions, determinants and change over time. Glob Environ Change 2011, 21:690-700.
51. Upham P., Lis A., Riesch H., Stankiewicz P. Theorising social representations in socio-technical transitions with the case of shale gas. Environ Innov Soc Transit 2015, 16:120-141.