Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in a consecutive cohort of men with no previous biopsy: Reduction of over detection through improved risk stratification

Journal of Urology

Volumn 194, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1601-1606

  Mendhiratta, Neil ^a   Rosenkrantz, Andrew B ^a   Meng, Xiaosong ^a   Wysock, James S ^b   Fenstermaker, Michael ^a   Huang, Richard ^a   Deng, Fang Ming ^a   Melamed, Jonathan ^a   Zhou, Ming ^a   Huang, William C ^a   Lepor, Herbert ^a   Taneja, Samir S ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK HOSPITAL QUEENS   (United States)

Author keywords

biopsy; diagnostic imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; prostatic neoplasms; ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; TUMOR MARKER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; COHORT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; ECHOGRAPHY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING ULTRASOUND FUSION GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY DEVICE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; AGED; BIOPSY; BLOOD; CANCER GRADING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; HEALTH SERVICE; INTERVENTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTILIZATION; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGED; BIOMARKERS, TUMOR; BIOPSY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; MEDICAL OVERUSE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NEOPLASM GRADING; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

EID: 84943187420     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.078     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. R. Siegel, J. Ma, Z. Zou, and et al. Cancer statistics, 2014 CA Cancer J Clin 64 2014 9
2. J.L. Wright, and W.J. Ellis Improved prostate cancer detection with anterior apical prostate biopsies Urol Oncol 24 2006 492
3. M.A. Levine, M. Ittman, J. Melamed, and et al. Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer J Urol 159 1998 471
4. N.E. Abraham, N. Mendhiratta, and S.S. Taneja Patterns of repeat prostate biopsy utilization in contemporary clinical practice J Urol 193 2015 1178
5. S. Carlsson, A.J. Vickers, M. Roobol, and et al. Prostate cancer screening: facts, statistics, and interpretation in response to the US Preventive Services Task Force review J Clin Oncol 30 2012 2581
6. S. Loeb, A. Vellekoop, H.U. Ahmed, and et al. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy Eur Urol 64 2013 876
7. M.G. Sanda, R.L. Dunn, J. Michalski, and et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors N Engl J Med 358 2008 1250
8. G. Steineck, F. Helgesen, J. Adolfsson, and et al. Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting N Engl J Med 347 2002 790
9. M.M. Siddiqui, S. Rais-Bahrami, H. Truong, and et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy Eur Urol 64 2013 713
10. J.S. Wysock, A.B. Rosenkrantz, W.C. Huang, and et al. A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of MR-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial Eur Urol 66 2013 343
11. M.R. Pokorny, M. De Rooij, E. Duncan, and et al. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent mr-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies Eur Urol 66 2014 22
12. A. Borkowetz, I. Platzek, M. Toma, and et al. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal MRI/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer BJU Int 2014 Epub ahead of print
13. M. Siddiqui, S. Rais-Bahrami, B. Turkbey, and et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsywith ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer JAMA 313 2015 390
14. A.B. Rosenkrantz, S. Kim, R.P. Lim, and et al. Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales Radiology 269 2013 482
15. A.B. Rosenkrantz, F.M. Deng, S. Kim, and et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MRI for index lesion localization - a multiple-reader study AJR Am J Roentgenol 199 2012 830
16. J.I. Epstein, P.C. Walsh, M. Carmichael, and et al. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer JAMA 271 1994 368
17. M.R. Cooperberg, D.J. Pasta, E.P. Elkin, and et al. The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy J Urol 173 2005 1938
18. S.S. Taneja, M.A. Bjurlin, H.B. Carter, and et al. White Paper: AUA/Optimal Techniques of Prostate Biopsy and Specimen Handling 2013 American Urological Association Linthicum
19. J. Cuzick, M.A. Thorat, G. Andriole, and et al. Prevention and early detection of prostate cancer Lancet Oncol 15 2014 e484
20. A. Dimakakos, A. Armakolas, and M. Koutsilieris Novel tools for prostate cancer prognosis, diagnosis, and follow-up Biomed Res Int 2014 2014 890697
21. M. Valerio, I. Donaldson, M. Emberton, and et al. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review Eur Urol 68 2015 8
22. P. Mozer, M. Rouprêt, C. Le Cossec, and et al. First round of targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion compared with conventional transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies for the diagnosis of localised prostate cancer BJU Int 115 2015 50
23. N.B. Delongchamps, M. Peyromaure, A. Schull, and et al. Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies J Urol 189 2013 493
24. J.S. Wysock, A.B. Rosenkrantz, X. Meng, and et al. Predictive value of negative 3T multiparametric prostate MRI on 12 core biopsy results J Urol 191 suppl. 2014 e754 abstract MP67-14