Perceptions on equity and responsibility in coastal zone policies

Ecological Economics

Volumn 119, Issue , 2015, Pages 284-291

  Clément, Valérie ^a   Rey Valette, Hélène ^a   Rulleau, Bénédicte ^b,c  

^a Lameta and University of Montpellier 1   (France)

^b CEARC EA 4455 University of Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines OVSQ   (France)

^c UR ETBX   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptation funding; Climate change; Distributional judgments; Managed retreat; Sea level rise; Social justice

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; EQUITY; FINANCIAL PROVISION; FLOODING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; MANAGED REALIGNMENT; PERCEPTION; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; SEA LEVEL CHANGE; SOCIAL JUSTICE; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84942870841     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abel N., Gorddard R., Harman B., Leitch A., Langridge J., Ryan A., Heyenga S. Sea level rise, coastal development and planned retreat: analytical framework, governance principles and an Australian case study. Environ. Sci. Pol. 2011, 14:279-288.
2. Anderson E. What is the point of equality?. Ethics 1999, 109:287-337.
3. Arneson R. Equality of opportunity for welfare. Philos. Stud. 1989, 56:77-93.
4. Atkinson G., Machado F., Mourato S. Balancing competing principles of environmental equity. Environ. Plan. A 2000, 32(10):1791-1806.
5. Babcock L., Loewenstein G. Explaining bargaining impasse: the role of self-serving biases. J. Econ. Perspect. 1997, 11(1):109-126.
6. Boateng I., Bray G., Bray M. Comparative Merits of Adaptation Policies of Sea Level Rise and Their Potential Impacts on Coastal Settlements in Developing Countries. Colloque Strategic Integration of Surveying Services. Hong Kong SAR, China 13-17 may 2007 2007, (16 pp.).
7. Cai B., Cameron T.A., Gerdes G.R. Distributional preferences and the incidence of costs and benefits in climate change policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2010, 46:429-458.
8. Caney S. Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility and global climate change. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2005, 18:747-775.
9. Cappelen A., Hole A., Sørensen E., Tungodden B. The pluralism of fairness ideals: an experimental approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 2007, 97(3):818-827.
10. Cappelen A., Konow J., Sorensen E., Tungodden B. Just luck: an experimental study of risk-taking and fairness. Am. Econ. Rev. 2013, 103(4):1398-1413.
11. Carlsson F., Kataria M., Lampi E., Lofgren A., Sterner T. Is fairness blind? The effect of framing on preferences for effort-sharing rules. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70:1529-1535.
12. CGDD Impacts à long terme du changement climatique sur le littoral métropolitain. Etudes et Documents n° 55, Octobre 2011 2011, (70 pp.).
13. Cohen G.A. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 1989, 906-944.
14. Cooper J.A.G., Lemckert C. Extreme sea level rise and adaptation option for coastal resort cities: a qualitative assessment from the gold coast Australia. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2012, 64:1-14.
15. Cooper J.A., McKenna J. Social justice in coastal erosion management: the temporal and spatial Dimensions. Geoforum 2008, 39:294-306.
16. Cooper J.A.G., Pile J. The adaptation-resistance spectrum: a classification of contemporary adaptation approaches to climate related coastal change. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2014, 94:90-98.
17. Dana R., Weber J., Kuang X. Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory 2007, 33:67-80.
18. Dutt V., Gonzales C. Decisions from experience reduce misconceptions about climate change. J. Environ. Psychol. 2012, 32(2012):19e29.
19. Dworkin R. What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources. Philos. Public Aff. 1981, 10:283-345.
20. Favarelli M. How context matters: a survey-based experiment on distributive justice. J. Public Econ. 2007, 91:1399-1422.
21. Fleurbaey M. Equal opportunity or equal social outcome?. Econ. Philos. 1995, 11:25-55.
22. Fleurbaey M. Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare 2008, Oxford University Press.
23. Gibbs M.T., Thebaud O., Lorezn D. A risk model to describe the behaviours of actors in the houses falling into the sea problem. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2013, 80:73-79.
24. Glenk K., Fisher A. Insurance, prevention or just wait and see? Public preferences for water management strategies in the context of climate change. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:2279-2291.
25. Grasso M. An ethical approach to climate adaptation finance. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2010, 20:74-81.
26. Grasso M. The role of justice in the south-north conflict in climate change: the case of negotiations on the adaptation fund. Int. Environ. Agreements 2010, 10:361-377.
27. Harsanyi J. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J. Polit. Econ. 1955, 63:309-321.
28. Johansson-Stenman O., Konow J. Fair air: distributive justice and environmental economics. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2010, 46:147-166.
29. Kelly P.M., Adger W.N. Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim. Chang. 2000, 47(4):325-352.
30. King D., Bird D., Haynes K., Boon H., Cottrell A., Millar J., Okada T., Box P., Keogh D., Thomas M. Voluntary relocation as an adaptation strategy to extreme weather events. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2014, 8:83-90.
31. Klinsky S., Dowlatabadi H. Conceptualizations of justice in climate policy. Clim. Pol. 2009, 9:88-108.
32. Klinsky S., Downlatabadi H., McDaniels T. Comparing public rationales for justice trade-offs in mitigation and adaptation climate policy dilemmas. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2012, 22:862-876.
33. Konow J. Fair and square: the four sides of distributive justice. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2001, 46(2):137-164.
34. Konow J. Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. J. Econ. Lit. 2003, 11:1188-1239.
35. Konow J. Is fairness in the eye of the beholder? An impartial spectator analysis of justice. Soc. Choice Welf. 2009, 33(1):101-127.
36. Lange A., Vogt C. Cooperation in international environmental negotiations due to a preference for equity. J. Public Econ. 2003, 87(9-10):2049-2067.
37. Lange A., Loschel A., Vogt C., Ziegler A. On the self-serving use of equity in international climate negotiations. Eur. Econ. Rev. 2010, 54(3):359-375.
38. Lecacheux S., Pedreros R., Devallée E., Poisson B., Garcin M. Evaluation simplifiée de la submersion marine à l'échelle du Languedoc-Roussillon. Rapport final ANR Projet Miseeva. 2011.
39. Magnier A. Cartographie de l'aléa submersion marine dans le golfe du lion. Etude de deux sites pilotes dans la cadre du projet SOLTER. Rapport Master Pro Gestion des catastrophes et des risques naturels 2013, Département de Géographie, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier, (86 pp.).
40. MEDDTL Stratégie nationale de gestion intégrée du trait de côte. Vers la relocalisation des activités et des biens. Rapport 2012, (20 pp.).
41. Miller D. Global Justice and Climate Change: How Should Responsibilities be Distributed?. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. 2008.
42. Myatt L.B., Scrimshaw M.D., Lester J.N. Public perceptions and attitude towards a forthcoming managed realignment scheme: freiston shore, Lincolnshire, UK. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2003, 46:565-582.
43. Nozick R. Anarchy, State and Utopia 1974, Oxford, Blackwell.
44. Paavola J., Adger W.N. Fair adaptation to climate change. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 56:594-609.
45. Pfister H.R., Böhm G. Decision Making in the Context of Environmental Risks. Decision Making: Social and Creative Dimensions 2001, 89-111. Kluwer Academic Pub. C. Allwood, M. Selart (Eds.).
46. Pilkey O. A time to look back at beach nourishment, editorial. J. Coast. Res. 1990, 6(1):iii-vii.
47. Pye K., Blott S.J. Coastal processes and morphological change in the dunwich-sizewell area, Suffolk, UK. J. Coast. Res. 2006, 22(3):453-473.
48. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass. 1971, Cambridge Univ. Press.
49. Rey-Valette H., Rulleau B., Meur-Ferec C., Flanquart H., Hellequin A.P., Sourisseau E. Les plages du littoral languedocien face au risque de submersion: définir des politiques de gestion tenant compte de la perception des usagers. Géog. Econ. Soc. 2012, 14:379-391.
50. Ringius L., Torvanger A., Underdal A. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy. Int. Environ. Agreements. 2002, 2:1-22.
51. Roemer J. A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philos. Public Aff. 1993, 22:146-166.
52. Schokkaert E., Gaertner W. Empirical Social Choice: Questionnaire-Experimental Studies on Distributive jJustice 2011, Cambridge University Press.
53. Shue H. Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law Policy 1993, 15(1):39-59.
54. Traub S., Seidl C., Schmidt U., Levati M. Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding, or somebody else? An experimental investigation of distributive justice. Soc. Choice Welf. 2005, 24:283-309.
55. Tungodden, B., 2003. The value of equality. Econ. Philos. Issue 1:1-44.
56. Turner K. Limits to CBA in UK and European environmental policy: retrospects and future prospects. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2007, 37:253-269.