Is fairness blind?-The effect of framing on preferences for effort-sharing rules

Ecological Economics

Volumn 70, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1529-1535

  Carlsson, Fredrik ^a   Kataria, Mitesh ^b   Lampi, Elina ^a   Löfgren, Åsa ^a   Sterner, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR THE SCIENCE OF HUMAN HISTORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Climate change; Effort sharing rules; Ethics; Fairness; Framing

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; CARBON EMISSION; CITIZENSHIP; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EMISSION CONTROL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

AFRICA; CHINA; EUROPE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79956095820     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alpizar F., Carlsson F., Martinsson P. Using choice experiments for non-market valuation. Economic Issues 2003, 8:83-110.
2. Babcock L., Loewenstein G. Explaining bargaining impasse: the role of self-serving biases. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1997, 11:109-126.
3. Cai B., Cameron T.A., Gerdes G. Distributional preferences and the incidence of costs and benefits in climate change policy. Environmental and Resource Economics 2010, 46:429-458.
4. Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance 1957, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California.
5. Johansson-Stenman O., Konow J. Fair air: distributional justice and environmental economics. Environmental and Resource Economics 2010, 46:147-166.
6. Konow J. Fair shares: accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. The American Economic Review 2000, 90:1072-1092.
7. Konow J. Fair and square: the four sides of distributive justice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2001, 46:137-164.
8. Lange A., Vogt C., Ziegler A. On the importance of equity in international climate policy: an empirical analysis. Energy Economics 2007, 29:545-562.
9. Lee J.J., Cameron T.A. Popularsupportforclimatechangemitigation: evidence from a general population mail survey. Environmental and Resource Economics 2008, 41:223-248.
10. Louviere J., Hensher D., Swait J. Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Application 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Ringius L., Torvanger A., Underdal A. Burden sharing and fairness principles in International Climate Policy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2002, 2:1-22.
12. Rose A., Stevens B., Edmonds J., Wise M. International equity and differentiation in global warming policy-an application to tradable emission permits. Environmental and Resource Economics 1998, 12:25-51.
13. Swait J., Louviere J. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. Journal of Marketing Research 1993, 30:305-314.
14. Tajfel H. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology 1982, 33:1-30.
15. Törnblom K.Y., Foa U.G. Choice of a distribution principle: cross cultural evidence on the effects of resources. Acta Sociologica 1983, 26:161-173.
16. Torvanger A., Ringius L. Criteria for evaluation of burden-sharing rules in international climate policy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2002, 2:221-235.
17. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.