Informed Decision Making: Assessment of the Quality of Physician Communication about Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 999-1009

  Holmes Rovner, Margaret ^a   Montgomery, Jeffrey S ^b,c   Rovner, David R ^a   Scherer, Laura D ^d,f   Whitfield, Jesse ^a   Kahn, Valerie C ^d,e   Merkle, Edgar C ^f   Ubel, Peter A ^g,h   Fagerlin, Angela ^d,e  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^c Section of Urology   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^e VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^g DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

decision making; informed decision making; localized prostate cancer; shared decision making

Indexed keywords

AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN; PROCEDURES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PSYCHOLOGY; RECORDING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES;

AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TAPE RECORDING; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS;

EID: 84942859302     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X15597226     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Johansson E, Steineck G, Holmberg L, et al. Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12 (9): 891-9.
2. Darwish-Yassine M, Berenji M, Wing D, et al. Evaluating long-term patient-centered outcomes following prostate cancer treatment: findings from the Michigan Prostate Cancer Survivor study. J Cancer Surviv. 2014; 8 (1): 121-30.
3. Liu D, Lehmann HP, Frick KD, Carter HB,. Active surveillance versus surgery for low risk prostate cancer: a clinical decision analysis. J Urol. 2012; 187 (4): 1241-6.
4. Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 1: CD001431.
5. Onel E, Hamond C, Wasson JH, et al. Assessment of the feasibility and impact of shared decision making in prostate cancer. Urology. 1998; 51 (1): 63-6.
6. Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Bennett C, Murray MA, Mullan S, Legare F,. Decision coaching to prepare patients for making health decisions: a systematic review of decision coaching in trials of patient decision AIDS. Med Decis Making. 2012; 32 (3): E22-E33.
7. Middleton RG, Thompson IM, Austenfeld MS, et al. Prostate Cancer Clinical Guidelines Panel Summary report on the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. The American Urological Association. J Urol. 1995; 154 (6): 2144-8.
8. Jimbo M, Rana GK, Hawley S, et al. What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening? CA Cancer J Clin. 2013; 63 (3): 193-214.
9. Sheridan SL, Shadle J, Simpson RJ J, Pignone MP,. The impact of a decision aid about heart disease prevention on patients discussions with their doctor and their plans for prevention: a pilot randomized trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006; 6: 121.
10. Mullan RJ, Montori VM, Shah ND, et al. The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169 (17): 1560-8.
11. Weymiller AJ, Montori VM, Jones LA, et al. Helping patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus make treatment decisions: statin choice randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167 (10): 1076-82.
12. Edwards A, Elwyn G,. Involving patients in decision making and communicating risk: a longitudinal evaluation of doctors attitudes and confidence during a randomized trial. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004; 10 (3): 431-7.
13. Nannenga MR, Montori VM, Weymiller AJ, et al. A treatment decision aid may increase patient trust in the diabetes specialist: the Statin Choice randomized trial. Health Expectations. 2009; 12 (1): 38-44.
14. Siminoff LA, Gordon NH, Silverman P, Budd T, Ravdin PM,. A decision aid to assist in adjuvant therapy choices for breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006; 15 (11): 1001-13.
15. Fagerlin A, Holmes-Rovner M, Rovner DR, et al. Is simpler better? Test of a plain language decision aid vs.higher literacy decision aid for prostate cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2015.
16. Holmes-Rovner M, Stableford S, Fagerlin A, et al. Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2005; 5 (1): 16.
17. NCCN guidelines for patients. 9, 2012. http://www.nccn.org/patients/patient-guidelines/prostate/index.html
18. Braddock CH III, Fihn SD, Levinson W, Jonsen AR, Pearlman RA,. How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions: informed decision making in the outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12 (6): 339-45.
19. Price EL, Bereknyei S, Kuby A, Levinson W, Braddock CH III,. New elements for informed decision making: a qualitative study of older adults views. Patient Educ Couns. 2012; 86 (3): 335-41.
20. Leader A, Daskalakis C, Braddock CH III, et al. Measuring informed decision making about prostate cancer screening in primary care. Med Decis Making. 2012; 32 (2): 327-36.
21. Braddock CH III, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W,. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999; 282 (24): 2313-20.
22. Stacey D, Legare F, Pouliot S, Kryworuchko J, Dunn S,. Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: a theory analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 80 (2): 164-72.
23. Makoul G, Clayman ML,. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 60 (3): 301-12.
24. Lieber E,. DeDoose © 2013. Manhattan Beach (CA): SocioCultural Research Consultants; 2013.
25. SPSS: Statistical Program for the Social Sciences [computer program]. Version 11.0.1. Chicago: SPSS; 2001.
26. Microsoft Excel 2010 [computer program]. Version 2010. Redmond (WA): Microsoft; 2009.
27. Rosseel Y,. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Software. 2014; 48 (2): 1-36.
28. Lin GA, Aaronson DS, Knight SJ, Carroll PR, Dudley RA,. Patient decision aids for prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of the literature. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009; 59 (6): 379-90.
29. Patel HD, Humphreys E, Trock BJ, Han M, Carter HB,. Practice patterns and individual variability of surgeons performing radical prostatectomy at a high volume academic center. J Urol. 2015; 193 (3): 812-9.
30. Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, et al. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. 2007. http://www.auanet.org/education/guidelines/prostate-cancer-detection.cfm
31. Nambudiri VE, Landrum MB, Lamont EB, et al. Understanding variation in primary prostate cancer treatment within the Veterans Health Administration. Urology. 2012; 79 (3): 537-45.
32. Womble PR, Montie JE, Ye Z, Linsell SM, Lane BR, Miller DC,. Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015; 67 (1): 44-50.
33. Berry DL, Halpenny B, Hong F, et al. The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision support for men with localized prostate cancer: a multi-center randomized trial. Urol Oncol. 2013; 31 (7): 1012-21.