Blast fragility and performance-based pressure-impulse diagrams of European reinforced concrete columns

Engineering Structures

Volumn 103, Issue , 2015, Pages 285-297

  Parisi, Fulvio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Blast damage; Blast fragility; Performance based design and assessment; Pressure impulse diagrams; Reinforced concrete columns

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; CONCRETES; DAMAGE DETECTION; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; TERRORISM;

PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN; PRESSURE-IMPULSE DIAGRAMS; PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE; QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS; REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN; REINFORCEMENT RATIOS; RESIDENTIAL BUILDING; STRUCTURAL COMPONENT;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

BUILDING; COLUMN; DESIGN; LOADING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; REINFORCEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EUROPE;

EID: 84942583107     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: 18737323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Starossek U. Typology of progressive collapse. Eng Struct 2007, 29(9):2302-2307.
2. Starossek U., Haberland M. Disproportionate collapse: terminology and procedures. J Perform Construct Facil 2010, 24(6):519-528.
3. Allen D.E., Schriever W.R. Progressive collapse, abnormal loads and building codes 1972, Division of Building Research Council, Québec.
4. Ellingwood B.R., Leyendecker E.V. Approaches for design against progressive collapse. J Struct Div 1978, 104(3):;413-;423.
5. Gross J.L., McGuire W. Progressive collapse resistant design. J Struct Eng 1983, 109(1):1-15.
6. Pearson C., Delatte N. Ronan Point Apartment tower collapse and its effect on building codes. J Perform Construct Facil 2005, 19(2):172-177.
7. GSA 2003. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. Washington, DC: US General Service Administration; 2003.
8. NSTIR 7396. Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2007.
9. UFC 4-023-03. Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. Unified Facilities Criteria. Washington, DC: US Department of Defence; 2010.
10. ASCE 7-05. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2005.
11. Eurocode 1: Basis of design and actions on structures - Part 2-7: actions on structures - accidental actions due to impact and explosions. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation; 2000.
12. DM 14.01.2008: Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Rome: Italian Ministry of Infrastructure and Transportation; 2008 [in Italian].
13. fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010. Lausanne: Fédération internationale du béton; 2010.
14. Izzuddin B.A., Vlassis A.G., Elghazouli A.Y., Nethercot D.A. Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss - part I: simplified assessment framework. Eng Struct 2008, 30(5):1308-1318.
15. Vlassis A.G., Izzuddin B.A., Elghazouli A.Y., Nethercot D.A. Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss - part II: application. Eng Struct 2008, 30(5):1424-1438.
16. Kim J., Kim T. Assessment of progressive collapse-resisting capacity of steel moment frames. Eng Struct 2009, 65(1):169-179.
17. Fu F. Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise building with 3-D finite element modeling method. J Construct Steel Res 2009, 65(6):1269-1278.
18. Xu G., Ellingwood B.R. An energy-based partial pushdown analysis procedure for assessment of disproportionate collapse potential. J Construct Steel Res 2011, 67:547-555.
19. Olmati P., Petrini F., Bontempi F. Numerical analyses for the structural assessment of steel buildings under explosions. Struct Eng Mech 2013, 45(6):803-819.
20. Kwasniewski L. Nonlinear dynamic simulations of progressive collapse for a multistory building. Eng Struct 2010, 32(5):1223-1235.
21. Sasani M. Response of a reinforced concrete infilled-frame structure to removal of two adjacent columns. Eng Struct 2008, 30:2478-2491.
22. Tsai M.-H., Lin B.-H. Investigation of progressive collapse resistance and inelastic response for an earthquake-resistant RC building subjected to column failure. Eng Struct 2008, 30(12):3619-3628.
23. Shi Y., Li Z.-X., Hao H. A new method for progressive collapse analysis of RC frames under blast loading. Eng Struct 2010, 32(6):1691-1703.
24. Santafé Iribarren B., Berke P., Bouillard P.h., Vantomme J., Massart T.J. Investigation of the influence of design and material parameters in the progressive collapse analysis of RC structures. Eng Struct 2011, 33(10):2805-2820.
25. Jayasooriya R., Thambiratnam D.P., Perera N.j., Kosse V. Blast and residual capacity analysis of reinforced concrete framed buildings. Eng Struct 2011, 33(12):3483-3495.
26. Parisi F., Augenti N. Influence of seismic design criteria on blast resistance of RC framed buildings: a case study. Eng Struct 2012, 44:78-93.
27. Dat P.X., Hai T.K. Membrane actions of RC slabs in mitigating progressive collapse of building structures. Eng Struct 2013, 55:107-115.
28. Brunesi E., Nascimbene R. Extreme response of reinforced concrete buildings through fiber force-based finite element analysis. Eng Struct 2014, 69:206-215.
29. Bennett R.M. Formulations for probability of progressive collapse. Struct Safety 1988, 5(1):66-77.
30. Agarwal J., Blockley D.I., Woodman N.J. Vulnerability of structural systems. Struct Safety 2003, 25(3):263-286.
31. Baker J.W., Schubert M., Faber M.H. On the assessment of robustness. Struct Safety 2008, 30:253-267.
32. Ellingwood B.R. Mitigating risk from abnormal loads and progressive collapse. J Perform Construct Facil 2006, 20(4):315-323.
33. Porter K., Kennedy R., Bachman R. Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthq Spectra 2007, 23(2):471-489.
34. Stewart M.G., Netherton M.D., Rosowsky D.V. Terrorism risks and blast damage to built infrastructure. Nat Hazard Rev 2006, 7(3):114-122.
35. Hao H., Stewart M.G., Li Z.-X., Shi Y. RC column failure probabilities to blast loads. Int J Protect Struct 2010, 1(4):571-591.
36. Park J., Kim J. Fragility analysis of steel moment frames with various seismic connections subjected to sudden loss of a column. Eng Struct 2010, 32(6):1547-1555.
37. Manfredi G., Masi A., Pinho R., Verderame G., Vona M. Valutazione degli edifici esistenti in cemento armato 2007, IUSS Press, Pavia, [in Italian].
38. Masi A. Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity load designed R/C frames. Bull Earthq Eng 2003, 1(3):371-395.
39. Masi A., Vona M. Vulnerability assessment of gravity-load designed RC building: evaluation of seismic capacity through non-linear dynamic analyses. Eng Struct 2012, 45:257-269.
40. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation; 2004.
41. Shi Y., Hao H., Li Z.-X. Numerical derivation of pressure-impulse diagrams for prediction of RC column damage to blast loads. Int J Impact Eng 2008, 35(11):1213-1227.
42. Pate-Cornell M.E. Quantitative safety goals for risk management of industrial facilities. Struct Safety 1994, 13(3):145-157.
43. Stewart M.G. Acceptable risk criteria for infrastructure protection. Int J Protect Struct 2010, 1(1):23-40.
44. Stewart M.G., Melchers R.E. Probabilistic risk assessment of engineering systems 1997, Chapman & Hall, London.
45. Risk assessment in engineering - principles, system representation and risk criteria. Zurich: Joint Committee on Structural Safety; 2008.
46. Netherton M.D., Stewart M.G. Blast load variability and accuracy of blast load prediction models. Int J Protect Struct 2010, 1(4):543-570.
47. Shi Y., Stewart M.G. Spatial reliability analysis of explosive blast load damage to reinforced concrete columns. Struct Safety 2015, 53:13-25.
48. Regio-Decreto Legge 16 novembre 1939 n. 2229: Norme per l'esecuzione delle opere in conglomerato cementizio semplice od armato. Rome; 1939 [in Italian].
49. Decreto Ministeriale 30 maggio 1972: Norme tecniche alle quali devono uniformarsi le costruzioni in conglomerato cementizio, normale e precompresso ed a struttura metallica. Rome: Italian Ministry of Public Works; 1972 [in Italian].
50. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation; 1993.
51. Verderame GM, Manfredi G, Frunzio G. Le proprietà meccaniche dei calcestruzzi impiegati nelle strutture in cemento armato realizzate negli anni '60. In: Proc 10th Italian conf earthq eng, Potenza-Matera; 2001 [in Italian].
52. Verderame GM, Stella A, Cosenza E. Le proprietà meccaniche degli acciai impiegati nelle strutture in c.a. realizzate negli anni '60. In: Proc 10th Italian conf earthq eng, Potenza-Matera; 2001 [in Italian].
53. Galasso C., Maddaloni G., Cosenza E. Uncertainly analysis of flexural overstrength for capacity design of RC beams. J Struct Eng 2014, 140(7):04014037-1-04014037-9.
54. Sezen H., Moehle J.P. Shear strength model for lightly reinforced concrete columns. J Struct Eng 2004, 130(11):1692-1703.
55. CEB-FIP Model Code 1990. CEB Bulletin d'Information no. 213/214. Lausanne: Comité Euro-International du Béton; 1993.
56. Rice J.A. Mathematical statistics and data analysis 1995, Duxbury Press, Belmont.
57. Shinozuka M., Feng M.Q., Lee J., Naganuma T. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. J Eng Mech 2000, 126(12):1224-1231.