Nonlinear dynamic simulations of progressive collapse for a multistory building

Engineering Structures

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1223-1235

  Kwasniewski, Leslaw ^a  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cardington test; Computer simulation; Finite element model; Nonlinear transient dynamic analysis; Progressive collapse; Robustness; Validation; Verification

Indexed keywords

3D MODELS; COLUMN REMOVAL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; FIRE TESTS; GLOBAL MODELS; HIERARCHICAL VERIFICATION; LARGE BUILDINGS; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; MODELING PARAMETERS; MULTIPROCESSOR COMPUTERS; MULTISTORY BUILDING; NON-LINEAR DYNAMICS; NONLINEAR DYNAMIC SIMULATION; NONLINEAR TRANSIENT DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR TRANSIENT DYNAMICS; NUMERICAL STUDIES; PARALLEL PROCESSING; PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE; PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE ANALYSIS; STEEL FRAMED STRUCTURE; VERTICAL LOADINGS;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; FIREPROOFING; FIRING (OF MATERIALS); FLAMMABILITY TESTING; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; TALL BUILDINGS; TEST FACILITIES; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TRANSIENT ANALYSIS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

COLLAPSE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LOADING; MODEL VALIDATION; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; NONLINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; STEEL STRUCTURE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 77950340080     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.048     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. EN 1991-1-7 (2006), Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-7: General actions accidental actions. European Committee for Standardization; 2005.
2. US Department of Defense (DoD). Unified facilities criteria (UFC), DoD minimum antiterrorism standards for buildings. Washington (DC), Department of Defense, UFC 4-010-01, US Army Corps of Engineering; 2002. p. 31.
3. General Services Administration (GSA). Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. Washington (DC) Office of Chief Architect; 2000.
4. Marjanishvili S.M. Progressive analysis procedure for progressive collapse. J Perform Constr Facilities ASCE 2004, 18(2):79-85.
5. Herrle KW, McKay AE Development and application of progressive collapse design criteria for the federal government 2001, GSA. Applied Research Associates, Inc., http://www.buildingsecurity.us/odoc/usbuilding/pdfs/DevAppPCDesignCriteria.pdf.
6. Bae S.W., LaBoube R.A., Belarbi A., Ayoub A. Progressive collapse of cold-formed steel framed structures. Thin-Walled Struct 2008, 46:706-719.
7. Khandelwala K., El-Tawila S., Sadekb F. Progressive collapse analysis of seismically designed steel braced frames. J Constr Steel Res 2009, 65:699-708.
8. Izzuddin B.A., Vlassis A.G., Elghazouli A.Y. Nethercot DA. Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss - Part I: Simplified assessment framework. Eng Struct 2008, 30:1308-1318.
9. Vlassis A.G., Izzuddin B.A., Elghazouli A.Y., Nethercot D.A. Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss-Part II: Application. Eng Struct 2008, 30:1424-1438.
10. Hartmann D., Breidt M., Nguyen V., Stangenberg F., Höhler S., Schweizerhof K., et al. Structural collapse simulation under consideration of uncertainty - Fundamental concept and results. Comput Struct 2008, 86:2064-2078.
11. Möller B., Liebscher M., Schweizerhof K., Mattern S., Blankenhorn G. Structural collapse simulation under consideration of uncertainty - Improvement of numerical efficiency. Comput Struct 2008, 86:1875-1884.
12. Lynn K.M., Isobe D. Structural collapse analysis of framed structures under impact loads using ASI-Gauss finite element method. Int J Impact Eng 2007, 34:1500-1516.
13. Kaewkulchai G., Williamson E.B. Beam element formulation and solution procedure for dynamic progressive collapse analysis. Comput Struct 2004, 82:639-651.
14. Kim H.S., Kim J., An D.W. Development of integrated system for progressive collapse analysis of building structures considering dynamic effects. Adv Eng Software 2009, 40:1-8.
15. Usmani A.S., Chung Y.C., Torero J.L. How did the WTC towers collapse: A new theory. Fire Safety J 2003, 38:501-533.
16. Munjiza A., Bangash T., John N.W.M. The combined finite-discrete element method for structural failure and collapse. Eng Fract Mech 2004, 71:469-483.
17. Lee C.H., Kim S., Han K.H., Lee K. Simplified nonlinear progressive collapse analysis of welded steel moment frames. J Constr Steel Res 2009, 65:113-1137.
18. Mohamed O.A. Assessment of progressive collapse potential in corner floor panels of reinforced concrete buildings. Eng Struct 2009, 31:749-757.
19. Wang Y.C. An analysis of the global structural behaviour of the Cardington steel-framed building during the two BRE fire tests. Eng Struct 2000, 22:401-412.
20. British Steel. The Behaviour of a multi-storey steel framed building subjected to fire attack experimental data by British steel plc. 1998. http://www.mace.manchester.ac.uk/project/research/structures/strucfire/DataBase/TestData/default1.htm.
21. BRE. Results and observations from full-scale fire test at BRE cardington. 16 January 2003. Client Report by Building Research Establishment; 2004. http://www.mace.manchester.ac.uk/project/research/structures/strucfire/DataBase/TestData/default1.htm.
22. Bravery PN. Cardington large building test facility: Construction details for the first building. Building Research Establishment; 1994.
23. Wald F, da Silva LS, Moore D, Santiago A. Experimental behaviour of steel joints under natural fire. In: ECCS-AISC workshop. 2004.
24. El-Dardiry E., Ji T. Modelling of the dynamic behaviour of profiled composite floors. Eng Struct 2006, 28:567-579.
25. Hallquist JO. LS-DYNA Keyword Manual. Version 971. Livermore: Livermore Software Technology Corporation; 2007.
26. ENV 1993-1-1. Eurocode 3. Design of steel structures. General rules and rules for buildings. 1994.
27. Galambos T.V. Recent research and design developments in steel and composite steel-concrete structures in USA. J Constr Steel Res 2000, 55(1-3):289-303.
28. Byfield M.P., Davies J.M., Dhanalakshmi M. Calculation of the strain hardening behaviour of steel structures based on mill tests. J Constr Steel Res 2005, 61:133-150.
29. da Silva L.S., Rebelo C., Nethercot D., Marquesa L., SimÕesa R. Vila Real PMM. Statistical evaluation of the lateral-torsional buckling resistance of steel I-beams, Part 2: Variability of steel properties. J Constr Steel Res 2009, 65:832-849.
30. Wheeler A.T., Clarke M.J., Hancock G.J.. Bending tests of bolted end plate connections in cold formed rectangular hollow sections. Research report no. R736. Australia, University of Sydney; 2006. http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/publications/r736.pdf.
31. Aribert J.-M., Braham M., Lachal A. Testing of simple joints and their characterisation for structural analysis. J Constr Steel Res 2004, 60:659-681.
32. Gillie M. Development of generalized stress strain relationships for the concrete slab in shell models. PIT project research report SS2, Technical report. University of Edinburgh; 2000. http://guardian.150m.com/fire/technicalreports.html.
33. ENV 1992-1-1:1992. Eurocode 2. Design of concrete structures - Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings. 1992.
34. Kwasniewski L. On practical problems with verification and validation of computational models. Arch Civil Eng 2009, LV(3):323-346.
35. Oberkampf W.L., Trucano T.G., Hirsch C. Verification, validation, and predictive capability in computational engineering and physics. Appl Mech Rev 2004, 57(10):345-384.
36. Grantham R. Cardington static tests: Rationale and procedure. In: G.S.T. Armer, T. O'Dell (Eds.) LBTF, Fire, static and dynamic tests of building structures: Proceedings of the 2nd cardington conference. p. 171-6.
37. Schwer LE, Malvar LJ. Simplified concrete modeling with *MAT_CONCRET_DAMAGE_REL3. LS-DYNA Anwenderforum, Bamberg; 2005.
38. Malvar LJ, Simons D. Concrete material modeling in explicit computations. In: Workshop on recent advances in computational structural dynamics and high performance computing, USAE Waterways Experiment Station, April 24-26 1996.
39. ABAQUS. ABAQUS Benchmarks Manual. ABAQUS, Inc., Version 6.6, USA; 2006.
40. Du Bois P, Feucht M, Haufe A, Kolling S. A generalized damage and failure formulation for SAMP. LS-DYNA Anwenderforum, Keynote - Vorträge II, Ulm; 2006.
41. Gillie M. Investigation of membrane flexure interaction in the Cardington slab at elevated temperatures. PIT project research report SS3, Technical report: University of Edinburg; 2000. http://guardian.150m.com/fire/technicalreports.html.
42. Ellis BR, Ji T. Investigation of the dynamic characteristics of the steel-framed building at the Cardington. In: G.S.T. Armer, T. O'Dell (Eds.). LBTF, Fire, static and dynamic tests of building structures. Proceedings of the 2nd Cardington Conference. 1996. p. 181-91.
43. Ellis B.R. Full-scale measurements of the dynamic characteristics of buildings in the UK. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1996, 59:365-382.