Assessment of progressive collapse-resisting capacity of steel moment frames

Journal of Constructional Steel Research

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 169-179

  Kim, Jinkoo ^a   Kim, Taewan ^b  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b Kangwon National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Alternate path method; Linear static analysis; Nonlinear dynamic analysis; Progressive collapse; Steel moment resisting frames

Indexed keywords

ARSENIC; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; HYSTERESIS; METAL ANALYSIS; METHOD OF MOMENTS; MODEL STRUCTURES; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; STEEL; STEEL BEAMS AND GIRDERS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

ALTERNATE PATH METHOD; ALTERNATE PATH METHODS; APPLIED LOADS; BUILDING STRUCTURES; COLUMN REMOVALS; HYSTERETIC BEHAVIORS; LINEAR ANALYSES; LINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS; LINEAR STATICS; MOMENT RESISTING FRAMES; NONLINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSES; NONLINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE; PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE ANALYSIS; PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSES; STEEL MOMENT FRAMES; STRUCTURAL RESPONSES;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 56549122877     PISSN: 0143974X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.03.020     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST). Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings (Draft)
2. GSA. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. The U.S. General Services Administration; 2003
3. Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC)-DoD. Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse, Department of Defense, 2005
4. FEMA 274. NEHRP Commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (1997), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington (DC)
5. Kaewkulchai G, Williamson EB. Dynamic behavior of planar frames during progressive collapse. In: 16th ASCE engineering mechanics conference. 2003
6. Marjanishvili S.M. Progressive analysis procedure for progressive collapse. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 18 2 (2004) 79-85
7. Powell G.. Progressive collapse: Case study using nonlinear analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2005 structures congress and the 2005 forensic engineering symposium. 2005
8. Ruth P., Marchand K.A., and Williamson E.B. Static equivalency in progressive collapse alternative path analysis: Reducing conservatism while retaining structural integrity. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 20 4 (2006) 349-364
9. Marjanishvili S., and Agnew E. Comparison of various procedures for progressive collapse analysis. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 20 4 (2006) 365-374
10. Korean Building Code (KBC). Architectural Institute of Korea; 2005 [in Korean]
11. AISC. Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings (2003), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago (IL)
12. MIDAS Genw. General structure design system for windows (2005), MIDAS Information Technology Co Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea
13. ICC. International building code (2006), International Code Council, Inc., Birmingham (AL)
14. Mazzoni S., McKenna F., Scott M.H., and Fenves G.L. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation, user command-language manual (2006), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley (CA)
15. Pretlove A.J., Ramsden M., and Atkins A.G. Dynamic effects in progressive failure of structures. International Journal of Impact Engineering 11 4 (1991) 539-546