An assessment of air pollutant exposure methods in Mexico City, Mexico

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 581-591

  Rivera González, Luis O ^a   Zhang, Zhenzhen ^a   Sánchez, Brisa N ^a   Zhang, Kai ^b   Brown, Daniel G ^a   Rojas Bracho, Leonora ^c   Osornio Vargas, Alvaro ^d   Vadillo Ortega, Felipe ^e   O’Neill, Marie S ^a,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c Independent Consultant   (Mexico)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^f Section on Statistical Genetics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; ERRORS; INTERPOLATION; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LOCATION; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; OBSTETRICS; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); VOLTAGE MEASUREMENT;

AIR POLLUTION EXPOSURES; DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS; EXPOSURE MISCLASSIFICATION; GEOSTATISTICAL INTERPOLATION; INVERSE DISTANCE WEIGHTING; OUTDOOR AIR POLLUTION; RESIDENTIAL LOCATIONS; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

AIR MONITORING; AIR POLLUTANT; AIR QUALITY; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; MEXICO; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; AIR POLLUTION; ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FEMALE; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; SEASON;

AIR POLLUTANT;

AIR POLLUTANTS; AIR POLLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MEXICO; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREGNANCY; SEASONS;

EID: 84942580933     PISSN: 10962247     EISSN: 21622906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2015.1020974     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bell, M. L., K. Ebisu, et al. 2007. Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Environ. Health Perspect. 115(7):1118-24. doi:10.1289/ehp.9759
2. Beyer, H. L. 2004. Hawth's Analysis Tools for ArcGIS. http://www. spatialecology.com/htools.
3. Borja-Aburto, V. H., M. Castillejos, et al. 1998. Mortality and ambient fine particles in southwest Mexico City, 1993-1995. Environ. Health Perspect. 106(12):849-55. doi:10.2307/3434129
4. Borja-Aburto, V. H., D. P. Loomis, et al. 1997. Ozone, suspended particulates, and daily mortality in Mexico City. Am. J. Epidemiol. 145(3):258-68. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009099
5. Brauer, M., C. Lencar, et al. 2008. A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution impacts on birth outcomes. Environ. Health Perspect. 116(5):680-6. doi:10.1289/ehp.10952
6. Brunekreef, B. and S. T. Holgate. 2002. Air pollution and health. Lancet 360:1233-42. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11274-8
7. Chang, H. H., B. J. Reich, et al. 2012. Time-to-event analysis of fine particle air pollution and preterm birth: Results from North Carolina, 2001-2005. Am. J. Epidemiol. 175(2):91-98. doi:10.1093/aje/kwr403
8. Cohen, A. J., H. Ross Anderson, et al. 2005. The global burden of disease due to outdoor air pollution. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 68(13-14):1301-7. doi:10.1080/15287390590936166
9. Ettinger, A. S., H. C. Lamadrid-Figueroa, et al. 2008. Effect of calcium supplementation on blood lead levels in pregnancy: A randomized placebo- controlled trial. Environ. Health Perspect. 117(1):26-31. doi:10.1289/ehp.11868
10. Gryparis, A., C. J. Paciorek, et al. 2009. Measurement error caused by spatial misalignment in environmental epidemiology. Biostatistics 10(2):258-74. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxn033
11. Hamilton, B. E., D. L. Hoyert, et al. 2013. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010-2011. Pediatrics 131(3):548-558. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3769
12. INEGI. 2010. Censo de Poblacion y Vivienda: Estados Unidos Mexicanos Resultados Preliminares. http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/proyectos/ ccpv/cpv2010/.
13. 2 exposure in a cohort of pregnant women. Sci. Total Environ. 407(23):6093-99. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.006
14. Janssen, N. A. H., P. H. N. van Vliet, et al. 2001. Assessment of exposure to traffic related air pollution of children attending schools near motorways. Atmos. Environ. 35(22):3875-84. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00144-3
15. Jedrychowski, W., A. Galas, et al. 2005. Prenatal ambient air exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and the occurrence of respiratory symptoms over the first year of life. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 20(9):775-82. doi:10.1007/s10654-005-1048-1
16. Jerrett, M., A. Arain, et al. 2004. A review and evaluation of intraurban air pollution exposure models. J. Expos. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 15 (2):185-204. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500388
17. Jerrett, M., R. T. Burnett, et al. 2005. Spatial analysis of air pollution and mortality in Los Angeles. Epidemiology 16(6):727-36. doi:10.1097/01. ede.0000181630.15826.7d
18. Kim, S.-Y., L. Sheppard, et al. 2009. Health effects of long-term air pollution: Influence of exposure prediction methods. Epidemiology 20(3):442-50. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e31819e4331
19. Künzli, N., M. Jerrett, et al. 2005. Ambient air pollution and atherosclerosis in Los Angeles. Environ. Health Perspect. 113(2):201-6. doi:10.1289/ ehp.7523
20. Leem, J. H., B. M. Kaplan, et al. 2006. Exposures to air pollutants during pregnancy and preterm delivery. Environ. Health Perspect. 114(6):905-10. doi:10.1289/ehp.8733
21. Liao, D., D. Peuquet, et al. 2006. GIS approaches for the estimation of residentiallevel ambient PM concentrations. Environ. Health Perspect. 114(9):1374-80. doi:10.1289/ehp.9169
22. Liu, S., D. Krewski, et al. 2003. Association between gaseous ambient air pollutants and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada. Environ. Health Perspect. 111(14):1773-78. doi:10.1289/ehp.6251
23. Madsen, L., D. Ruppert, et al. 2008. Regression with spatially misaligned data. Environmetrics 19(5):453-67. doi:10.1002/env.888
24. Manzano-León, N., R. Quintana, et al. 2013. Variation in the composition and in vitro proinflammatory effect of urban particulate matter from different sites. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 27(1):87-97. doi:10.1002/jbt.21471
25. Marshall, J. D., E. Nethery, et al. 2008. Within-urban variability in ambient air pollution: Comparison of estimation methods. Atmos. Environ. 42(6): 1359-69. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.08.012
26. Navidi, W., D. Thomas, et al. 1999. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution. Res. Rep. Health Effects Institute 86:1-50.
27. Nethery, E., S. E. Leckie, et al. 2008. From measures to models: an evaluation of air pollution exposure assessment for epidemiological studies of pregnant women. Occup. Environ. Med. 65(9):579-86. doi:10.1136/ oem.2007.035337
28. O'Neill, M. S., M. Ramirez-Aguilar, et al. 2003. Ozone exposure among Mexico City outdoor workers. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 53(3): 339-46. doi:10.1080/10473289.2003.10466156
29. O'Neill, M. S., A. Osornio-Vargas, et al. 2013. Air pollution, inflammation and preterm birth in Mexico City: Study design and methods. Sci. Total Environ. 448:79-83. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.079
30. Osornio-Vargas, A. R., J. C. Bonner, et al. 2003. Proinflammatory and cytotoxic effects ofMexico City air pollution particulate matter in vitro are dependent on particle size and composition. Environ. Health Perspect. 111(10):1289-93. doi:10.1289/ehp.5913
31. Ozkaynak, H., L. K. Baxter, et al. 2013. Evaluation and application of alternative air pollution exposure metrics in air pollution epidemiology studies. J. Expos. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 23(6):565-65. doi:10.1038/jes.2013.50
32. Ozkaynak, H., L. K. Baxter, et al. 2013. Air pollution exposure prediction approaches used in air pollution epidemiology studies. J. Expos. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 23(6):566-72. doi:10.1038/jes.2013.15
33. Park, S. K., M. S. O'Neill, et al. 2008. Air pollution and heart rate variability: Effect modification by chronic lead exposure. Epidemiology 19(1):111-20. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e31815c408a
34. Pebesma, E. J. 2004. Multivariable geostatistics in S: The gstat package. Comput. Geosci. 30:683-91. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012
35. Perera, F., D. Tang, et al. 2005. DNA damage from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons measured by benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts in mothers and newborns from Northern Manhattan, the World Trade Center Area, Poland, and China. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prevent. 14(3):709-14. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0457
36. Perera, F. P., Z. Li, et al. 2009. Prenatal airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and child IQ at age 5 years. Pediatrics 124(2):e195-202. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3506
37. Rojas-Bracho, L. 1994. Evaluación del grado de exposición a aeroparticulas en los habitantes de la zona centro de la Ciudad de México. Master's thesis, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
38. Ross, Z., K. Ito, et al. 2013. Spatial and temporal estimation of air pollutants in New York City: Exposure assignment for use in a birth outcomes study. Environ. Health 12(1):51. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-12-51
39. Sagiv, S. K., P. Mendola, et al. 2005. A time-series analysis of air pollution and preterm birth in Pennsylvania, 1997-2001. Environ. Health Perspect. 113(5): 602-6. doi:10.1289/ehp.7646
40. Sarnat, J. A., K. W. Brown, J. Schwartz, B. A. Coull, P. Koutrakis. 2005. Ambient gas concentrations and personal particulate matter exposures: implications for studying the health effects of particles. Epidemiology 16(3):385-95.
41. Sarnat, S. E., M. Klein, et al. 2009. An examination of exposure measurement error from air pollutant spatial variability in time-series studies. J. Expos. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 20(2):135-46. doi:10.1038/jes.2009.10
42. Shad, R., M. S. Mesgari, et al. 2009. Predicting air pollution using fuzzy genetic linear membership kriging in GIS. Comput. Environ. Urban Systems 33(6):472-81. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.10.004
43. Shechtman, O. 2013. The coefficient of variation as an index of measurement reliability. In Methods of Clinical Epidemiology, ed. S. A. R. Doi and G. M. Williams, 39-49. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
44. Simpson, R. W., G. Williams, et al. 1997. Associations between outdoor air pollution and daily mortality in Brisbane, Australia. Arch. Environ. Health 52(6):442-54. doi:10.1080/00039899709602223
45. Slama, R., L. Darrow, et al. 2008. Atmospheric pollution and human reproduction: Report of the Munich International Workshop. Environ. Health Perspect. 116(6):791-98. doi:10.1289/ehp.11074
46. Slama, R., V. Morgenstern, et al. 2007. Traffic-related atmospheric pollutants levels during pregnancy and offspring's term birth weight: A study relying on a land-use regression exposure model. Environ. Health Perspect. 115(9): 1283-92. doi:10.1289/ehp.10047
47. Son, J.-Y., M. L. Bell, et al. 2010. Individual exposure to air pollution and lung function in Korea: Spatial analysis using multiple exposure approaches. Environ. Res. 110(8):739-49. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2010.08.003
48. Spiegelman, D., R. Logan, et al. 2011. Regression calibration with heteroscedastic error variance. Int. J. Biostat. 7(1):1-38. doi:10.2202/1557-4679.1259
49. Szpiro, A. A., C. J. Paciorek, et al. 2011. Does more accurate exposure prediction necessarily improve health effect estimates? Epidemiology 22(5):680-85. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182254cc6
50. Szpiro, A. A., P. D. Sampson, et al. 2010. Predicting intra-urban variation in air pollution concentrations with complex spatio-temporal dependencies. Environmetrics 21(6):606-31. doi:10.1002/env.1014
51. Vadillo-Ortega, F., A. Osornio-Vargas, et al. 2014. Air pollution, inflammation and preterm birth: A potential mechanistic link. Med. Hypoth. 82(2): 219-24. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2013.11.042
52. Wannemuehler, K. A., R. H. Lyles, et al. 2009. A conditional expectation approach for associating ambient air pollutant exposures with health outcomes. Environmetrics 20(7):877-94. doi:10.1002/env.978
53. Ward, M. H., J. R. Nuckols, et al. 2005. Positional accuracy of two methods of geocoding. Epidemiology 16(4):542-47. doi:10.1097/01.ede.000016 5364.54925.f3
54. Wilhelm, M., and B. Ritz. 2003. Residential proximity to traffic and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, 1994-1996. Environ. Health Perspect. 111(2):207-16. doi:10.1289/ehp.5688
55. Wong, D. W., L. Yuan, et al. 2004. Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for the estimation of air quality data. J. Expos. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 14(5): 404-15. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500338
56. Woodruff, T. J., J. D. Parker, et al. 2009. Methodological issues in studies of air pollution and reproductive health. Environ. Res. 109(3):311-20. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2008.12.012
57. Wyler, C., C. Braun-Fahrländer, et al. 2000. Exposure to motor vehicle traffic and allergic sensitization. Epidemiology 11(4):450-56. doi:10.1097/ 00001648-200007000-00015
58. Yorifuji, T., H. Naruse, et al. 2011. Residential proximity to major roads and preterm births. Epidemiology 22(1):74-80. doi:10.1097/ EDE.0b013e3181fe759f
59. Zou, B., J. G. Wilson, et al. 2009. Air pollution exposure assessment methods utilized in epidemiological studies. J. Environ. Monit. 11(3):475-90. doi:10.1039/b813889c
60. Zuk, M., G. Tzintzun Cervantes, et al. 2007. Tercer almanaque de datos y tendencias de la calidad del aire en nueve ciudades mexicanas. Ciudad de México, Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Mexico City, Mexico.