How can collaboration be strengthened between public health and primary care? A Dutch multiple case study in seven neighbourhoods

BMC Public Health

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Storm, Ilse ^a   Van Gestel, Anke ^b   Van De Goor, Ien ^c   Van Oers, Hans ^a,c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^b Regional Public Health Service Brabant Zuidoost   (Netherlands)

^c TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaboration; District health profiles; Integrated health policy; Policy dialogues; Primary care; Public health; Stepwise approach

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION; DEMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; NETHERLANDS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLICY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; POLICY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATION; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 84942515057     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2307-z     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. VWS. Gezondheid dichtbij. Landelijke nota gezondheidsbeleid (Health Nearby. National health policy document). The Hague: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; 2011.
2. ZonMw. Tools ter bevordering van een effectieve samenwerking preventie en curatie in de wijk (Tools for promoting effective collaboration between the public health and curative care disciplines in the neighbourhood.) http://www.zonmw.nl/nl/projecten/project-detail/tools-ter-bevordering-van-een-effectieve-samenwerking-preventie-curatie-in-de-wijk-modules-voor-wij/samenvatting/. Accessed March 2012.
3. WHO. Health 2020. A European policy framework and strategy for the 21st century. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2013.
4. VWS. Zorg en ondersteuning in de buurt. Beleidsbrief (Care and support in the neighbourhood. Policy document). The Hague: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; 2011.
5. BZK. Werken aan wijken. Deel 1. Ervaringen en vuistregels uit het experiment Samenhang in de wijk (Working on neighbourhoods. Part 1. Experiences and rules of thumb from the experiment Cohesion in the neighbourhood). The Hague: Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations; 2011.
6. Kickbusch I, Gleicher D. Governance for health in the 21st century: a study conducted for the WHO Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2011.
7. Droomers M, Harting J, Jongeneel-Grimen B, Rutten L, van Kats J, Stronks K. Area-based interventions to ameliorate deprived Dutch neighborhoods in practice: Does the Dutch District Approach address the social determinants of health to such an extent that future health impacts may be expected? Prev Med. 2014;61:122-7.
8. Valaitis R. Strengthening Primary Health Care through Primary Care and Public Health Collaboration Final Report for CFHI. Ottawa: Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement (CFHI); 2012.
9. Levesque J-F, Breton M, Senn N, Levesque P, Bergeron P, Roy DA. The interaction of public health and primary care: functional roles and organizational models that bridge individual and population perspectives. Public Health Rev. 2013;35:1-27(No 1).
10. Lavis J, Boyko JA, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health policy making (STP) 14: Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policy making. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7 Suppl 1:S14.
11. Cuyler A, Lomas J. Deliberative processes and evidence informed decision making in healthcare: do they work and how might we know? Evidence Policy. 2006;2(3):357-71.
12. Hogendorp J, de Boer A, van Driesten G. Huisarts en gemeenten. Samenwerken in de wijk (GPs and municipalities. Collaboration in the neighbourhood). Utrecht: National General Practitioners' Association (LHV); 2013.
13. ROS Robuust. ROS neighbourhood scan. http://www.ros-netwerk.nl/thema/geintegreerde-gebiedsanalyse/. Accessed May 2013.
14. Jan van Es Instituut. Wijk- en praktijkscan (Neighbourhood and practice scan). http://www.jvei.nl/wijk-en-praktijkscan/. Accessed May 2013.
15. GG and GD Utrecht. District health profile. http://www.utrecht.nl/over-volksgezondheid/publicaties-en-onderzoek/onderzoekspublicaties/. Utrecht. Accessed June 2013.
16. Terpstra J, Moerman M. Doorontwikkelen van een wijkprofiel. AMPHI project: proces en resultaat van de ontwikkeling van een gezondheidsprofiel (Further development of a district health profile. AMPHI project: process and outcome of the development of a health profile). Nijmegen: Nijmegen Region GGD and Rivierenland GGD; 2013.
17. van Bon-Martens MJH, de Bakker D, van Loon AJM, de Graaf-Ruizendaal WA, Jacobs-van Bruggen MAM, Zwakhals SLN, van Oers JAM. Afstemming regionale VTV en VAAM. Haalbaarheidsstudie naar een samenhangende informatievoorziening over gezondheid en zorg op lokaal en regionaal niveau (Coordination of regional VTV and VAAM. Feasibility study into the coherent provision of information about health and care at the local and regional levels). TSG 2012; 5: 305-311.
18. Petts J. Barriers to participation and deliberation in risk decisions: evidence from waste management. J Risk Res. 2004;7(2):115-33.
19. Lomas J, Culyer T, McCutcheon C, McAuley L, Law S. Conceptualizing and combining evidence for health system guidance. Final Report. Canada: Canadian Health Services Research foundation; 2005.
20. Storm I, van Gestel A. Preventie en zorg verbinden in de praktijk. Wijkgezondheidsprofiel en beleidsdialoog als handvatten (Connecting public health and primary care in practice. District health profile and policy dialogue as tools). Tilburg: Tranzo; 2014.
21. Yin R. Case study research: Design and methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003.
22. George A, Bennet A. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. BCSIA Studies in International Security. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2004.
23. Paes M. Wijkgezondheidswerk. Een studie naar 25 jaar wijkgericht werken aan gezondheid in Den Bosch-Oost (Neigbourhood health work. A study of 25 years of neighbourhood-focused health activities in Den Bosch-Oost). 's-Hertogenbosch: Faculteit der Maatschappij- en Gedragswetenschappen, Universiteit van Amsterdam; 2008.
24. Mulder, M. GGD-regio's 2014. In: Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationale Atlas Volksgezondheid (GGD regions 2014. In: Public Health Status and Forecasts Report, National Health Atlas). https://www.volksgezondheidenzorg.info/. Accessed June 2014.
25. ROS. ROS-netwerk (ROS-network). http://www.ros-netwerk.nl/. Accessed June 2014
26. CBS. Municipalities on 1 January 2014. http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/methoden/classificaties/overzicht/gemeentelijke-indeling/2014/default.htm. Accessed May 2015.
27. McMasterHealthForum. Toolkit 2: Policy Dialogues. https://www.mcmasterhealthforum.org/about-us/our-work/impact-lab/ktpe-overview/toolkit-2-policy-dialogues. Accessed May 2013.
28. Wagemakers A, Koelen MA, Lezwijn J, Vaandrager L. Coordinated action checklist: A tool for partnerships to facilitate and evaluate community health promotion. Global Health Promot. 2010;17(3):17-28.
29. van Bon-Martens MJH. The art of regional public health reporting. Strengthening the knowledge base for local public health policy [dissertation]. Tilburg: Tilburg University; 2011.
30. Bon-Martens MJH. van, Jeeninga W, Eck ECM van, Goor LAM van de, Oers JAM van. Evaluation of the regional Public Health Status and Forecast report (PHSF) in two Dutch regions. Familiarity with use, usefulness, and preconditions. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen. 2009;87(7):303-10.
31. de Goede J, van Bon-Martens MJH, Mathijssen JJP, Putters K, van Oers JAM. Looking for interaction: quantitative measurement of research utilization by Dutch local health officials. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012;10(9). doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-9.
32. Hamilton O. Collaboration for evidence-informed decision making. 2010 (Updated 29 April, 2011). http://www.nccmt.ca/registry/view/eng/55.html. Accessed May 2015.
33. Jacobs K, Grafin G, Lenart M. More than just talk: Connecting science and decision making. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2005;47(9):6-21.
34. Storm I, Harting J, Stronks K, Schuit AJ. Measuring stages of health in all policies on a local level: the applicability of a maturity model. Health Policy. 2014;114:183-91.
35. Steenbakkers M, Jansen M, Maarse H, de Vries N. Challenging Health in All Policies, an action research study in Dutch municipalities. Health Policy. 2012;105(2-3):288-95.
36. Schalk J, Reijnders MAW, Vielvoye R, Kouijzer I, de Jong M. Decentralization in the Netherlands: from blueprints to tailor-made services? The Hague Governance Quarterly. 2014;2(1).
37. Saltman R, Bankauskaite V, Vrangbaek K. Decentralization in health care. World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. 2007.
38. BZK. Decentralisatiebrief kabinet (Cabinet decentralisation memorandum). The Hague: Ministry of the Interior; 2013.
39. Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, et al. How should we define health? BMJ. 2011;343:D4163.
40. Mansfield CJ, Wilson JL. Community-level data. N C Med J. 2008;69(2):142-5.
41. Kommer K. Samen optrekken met het sociaal domein (Pulling together with the social domain). De eerstelijns (Primary Care) 2013;48-9.
42. Hoeymans N, Kooiker S. Burgers en gezondheid. Themarapport Volksgezondheid Toekomstverkennen 2014 (Local people and health. Public Health Status and Forecasts Report 2014 Theme Report). Bilthoven: RIVM; 2014.
43. McMasterHealthForum. Evidence briefs and stakeholder dialogues. http://www.mcmasterhealthforum.org/stakeholders/evidence-briefs-and-stakeholder-dialogues. Accessed June 2013.
44. Bekker M, Steenbakker M, Storm I, Jansen M. From instruments towards programme for HiAP decision-support? Health Impact Assessment in the Netherlands. In O'Mullan et al. editor. Integrating Health Impact Assessment into the Policy Process: Lessons and Experiences from Around the World. Oxford; 2013.
45. Jansma R, Wetsema K, Beker M. Raak! Effectieve communicatie van informeren tot co-creëren (Striking! Effective communication of informing to co-create). 2010.
46. Storm I. International Policy Overview: Health in All Policies (HIAP) 2012. http://www.nationaalkompas.nl/object-binary/o13534-International%20Policy%20Overview-HiAP-Mei2012.pdf. Accessed June 2014.
47. Bloten H, Koornstra A. Samenwerking GGD - ROS: sterke schakels in de regionale keten. Notitie ten behoeve van de GGD-Programmaraad OGZ en ROS-klankbordgroep Voorkomen van Zorg (GGD-ROS collaboration: strong links in the regional chain. Memorandum for the GGD Programme Council OGZ and ROS consultation group Prevention of Care. GGD GHOR Netherlands: Utrecht; 2011.
48. Oxman A, Vandvik PO, Lavis JN, Fretheim A, Lewin S. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 2: Improving how your organization supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(Suppl1):S2.