Coordinated action checklist: A tool for partnerships to facilitate and evaluate community health promotion

Global Health Promotion

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 17-28

  Wagemakers, Annemarie ^a   Koelen, Maria A ^a   Lezwijn, Jeanette ^b   Vaandrager, Lenneke ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Researcher Community Health Service   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

action research; collaboration; community health promotion; evaluation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; COMMUNITY CARE; COOPERATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PILOT STUDY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

CHECKLIST; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PILOT PROJECTS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 79960589766     PISSN: 17579759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1757975910375166     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Koelen MA, Vaandrager L., Wagemakers A. What is needed for coordinated action for health? Fam Pract. 2008; 25(S1): i25-i31.
2. WHO. Ottawa charter of health promotion. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 1986.
3. WHO. The Bangkok charter for health promotion in a globalized world. Bangkok: World Health Organization; 2005.
4. Green L., Daniel M., Novick L. Partnerships and coalitions for community-based research. Public Health Rep. 2001; 116(Suppl 1): 20-31.
5. Goldman KD, Schmalz KJ Being well-connected: starting and maintaining successful partnerships. Health Promot Pract. 2008; 9(1): 5-8.
6. Roussos ST, Fawcett SB A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000; 21(9): 369-402.
7. Anderson LM, Scrimshaw SC, Fullilove MT, Fielding JE Task force on community preventive services: the community guide's model for linking the social environment to health. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 24(3S): 12-20.
8. Metzler M., Amuyunzu-Nyamongo M., Mukhopadhyay A., de Salazar L. Community interventions on social determinants of health: focusing the evidence. In: McQueen DV, Jones CM, editors. Global Perspectives on Health Promotion Effectiveness. New York: Springer; 2007.
9. Bowen S., Martens PJ A model for collaborative evaluation of university-community partnerships. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60(10): 902-7.
10. Granner ML, Sharpe PA Evaluating community coalition characteristics and functioning: a summary of measurement tools. Health Educ Res. 2004; 19(5): 514-32.
11. Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Lantz P. Instrument for evaluating dimensions of group dynamics within community-based participatory research partnerships. Eval Program Plann. 2003; 26: 249-62.
12. South J., Fairfax P., Green E. Developing an assessment tool for evaluating community involvement. Health Expect. 2005; 8(1): 64-73.
13. Wagemakers A., Corstjens R., Koelen M., Vaandrager L., van't Riet H., Dijkshoorn H. Participatory approaches to promote healthy lifestyles among Turkish and Moroccan women in Amsterdam. Promot Educ. 2008; 15(4): 17-23.
14. Wagemakers A., Vaandrager L., Koelen MA, Saan H., Leeuwis C. Community health promotion: a framework to facilitate and evaluate supportive social environments for health. Eval Program Plann. 2010; 33(4): 428-35.
15. Butterfoss FD Process evaluation for community participation. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 27: 323-40.
16. Rütten A., Abu-Omar K., Leven L., Morgan A., Groce N., Stuart J. Research note: social catalysts in health promotion implementation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008; 62(6): 560-5.
17. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19: 173-202.
18. Jackson SF, Perkins F., Khandor E., Cordwell L., Hamann S., Buasai S. Capacity building. Integrated health promotion strategies: a contribution to tackling current and future health challenges. Health Promot Int. 2007; 21(S1): 75-83.
19. Green LW, Kreuter MW Health promotion planning: an educational and ecological approach. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
20. Potvin L., McQueen DV Practical dilemmas for health promotion evaluation. In: Potvin L, McQueen DV, editors. Health promotion practices in the Americas: values and research. New York: Springer; 2008.
21. Rice M., Franceschini MC Lessons learned from the application of a participatory evaluation methodology to healthy municipalities, cities and communities initiatives in selected countries of the Americas. Promot Educ. 2007; 14(2): 68-73.
22. Wallerstein N. What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? [Online]. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe (Health Evidence Network report); 2006. Available from: http://euro.who.int/Document/E88086.pdf
23. Andersson CM, Bjäras G., Tillgren P., Östenson CG. A longitudinal assessment of intersectoral participation in a community-based diabetes prevention programme. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 61(11): 2407-22.
24. Naylor P-J., Wharf-Higgins J., Blair L., Green L., O'Connor B. Evaluating the participatory process in a community-based heart health project. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 55(7): 1173-87.
25. Wagemakers MAE, Koelen MA, van Nierop PWM, Meertens YEG, Weijters Jchm, Kloek GC Actiebegeleidend onderzoek ter bevordering van intersectorale samenwerking en bewonersparticipatie: de ervaringen met het wijkgezondheidswerk in Eindhoven [Participatory action research to promote intersectoral collaboration and community participation: the experiences with ‘wijkgezondheidswerk’ in Eindhoven]. Tijdschrift Gezondheidswet. 2007; 85(1): 23-31.
26. Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. Ann Fam Med. 2008; 6(4): 331-9.
27. Pretty JN Regenerating agriculture policies and practice for sustainability and self-reliance. London: Earthscan; 1995.
28. Verbeke L., Snyers K., Kwanten L., Hasevoets, G. Netwerken en lokaal welzijnsbeleid: model, meetinstrument en praktijk [Networks and local well-being: model and tool for practice]. Brussel, Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap; 2004.
29. Rifkin SB, Muller F., Bichmann W. Primary health care: on measuring participation. Soc Sci Med. 1988; 26: 931-40.
30. Koelen MA, Vaandrager L., Colomer C. Health promotion: dilemmas and challenges. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001; 55(4): 257-62.
31. Florin P., Mitchell R., Stevenson J. Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach. Health Educ Res. 1993; 8(30): 417-32.
32. Sicotte C., D'Amour D., Moreault M-P. Interdisciplinary collaboration within Quebec community health care centres. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 55(6): 991-1003.
33. Cooperrider DL, Whitney D., Stavros JM Appreciative Inquiry Handbook. The first in a series of AI work-books for leaders of change. Brunswick (Ohio): Crown Custom Publishing; 2005.
34. Melander-Wikman A., Jansson M., Ghaye T. Reflections on an appreciative approach to empowering elderly people, in home healthcare. Reflective Pract. 2006; 7(4): 423-44.
35. Reed J., Richardson E., Marais S., Moyle W. Older people maintaining well-being: an international Appreciative Inquiry study. Int J Older People Nursing. 2008; 3(1): 68-75.
36. Michael S. The promise of appreciative inquiry as an interview tool for field research. Dev Pract. 2005; 15(2): 222-30.
37. Naaldenberg J., Vaandrager L., Koelen M., Wagemakers A., de Hoog C., Saan H. Elaborating on systems thinking in health promotion practice. Glob Health Promot. 2009; 16(1): 39-47.
38. Cook WK Integrating research and action: a systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USA. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008; 62(8): 668-76.
39. Glasgow RE, Emmons KM How can we increase translation of research into practice?: Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007; 28: 413-33.
40. Green LW, Glasgow RE Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof. 2006; 29(1): 126-53.
41. Tones K. Evaluating health promotion: a tale of three errors. Patient Educ Couns. 2000; 39(2-3): 227-36.