Clinical utilization of repeated open application test among American Contact Dermatitis Society members

Dermatitis

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 224-229

  Brown, Gabrielle E ^a   Botto, Nina ^b   Butler, Daniel C ^c   Murase, Jenny E ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^d Palo Alto Foundation Medical Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLERGY TEST; ANATOMICAL CONCEPTS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FOREARM; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ONLINE ANALYSIS; PATCH TEST; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPEATED OPEN APPLICATION TEST; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN TEST; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DERMATOLOGY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; UTILIZATION;

DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DERMATOLOGY; HUMANS; PATCH TESTS; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; SKIN TESTS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84942324876     PISSN: 17103568     EISSN: 21625220     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000132     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menne T, The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population-prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57 (5): 287-299.
2. Fleming CJ, Burden AD, Forsyth A,. Accuracy of questions related to allergic contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 2000; 11 (4): 218-221.
3. Militello G, Woo DK, Kantor J, The utility of the TRUE test in a private practice setting. Dermatitis 2006; 17 (2): 77-84.
4. Schleichert RA, Hostetler SG, Zirwas MJ,. Patch testing practices of American Contact Dermatitis Society members. Dermatitis 2010; 21 (2): 98-101.
5. Johansen JD,. Fragrance contact allergy: a clinical review. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003; 4 (11): 789-798.
6. Friedmann PS,. The immunology of allergic contact dermatitis: the DNCB story. Adv Dermatol 1990; 5: 175-195; discussion 196.
7. Johansen JD, Skov L, Volund A, Allergens in combination have a synergistic effect on the elicitation response: a study of fragrance-sensitized individuals. Br J Dermatol 1998; 139 (2): 264-270.
8. Edman B,. The influence of shaving method on perfume allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31 (5): 291-292.
9. Cheng J, Zug KA,. Fragrance allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis 2014; 25 (5): 232-245.
10. Basketter DA, Jefferies D, Safford BJ, The impact of exposure variables on the induction of skin sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 2006; 55 (3): 178-185.
11. White JM, Basketter DA, Pease CK, Intermittent exposure to low-concentration paraphenylenediamine can be equivalent to single, higher-dose exposure. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 56 (5): 262-265.
12. Hextall JM, Alagaratnam NJ, Glendinning AK, Dose-time relationships for elicitation of contact allergy to para-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 47 (2): 96-99.
13. Kynemund Pedersen L, Agner T, Held E, Methyldibromoglutaronitrile in leave-on products elicits contact allergy at low concentration. Br J Dermatol 2004; 151 (4): 817-822.
14. Heratizadeh A, Killig C, Worm M, Quantitative repeated open application testing with a rinse-off product in methyldibromo glutaronitrile-sensitive patients: results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 2010; 62 (6): 330-337.
15. Magnusson B, Hersle K,. Patch test methods. II. Regional variations of patch test responses. Acta Derm Venereol 1965; 45 (4): 257-261.
16. Hannuksela M, Salo H,. The repeated open application test (ROAT). Contact Dermatitis 1986; 14 (4): 221-227.
17. Andersch Bjorkman Y, Hagvall L, Siwmark C, Air-oxidized linalool elicits eczema in allergic patients-a repeated open application test study. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70 (3): 129-138.
18. Svedman C, Engfeldt M, Api AM, A pilot study aimed at finding a suitable eugenol concentration for a leave-on product for use in a repeated open application test. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 66 (3): 137-139.
19. Fischer LA, Johansen JD, Menne T,. Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds. Br J Dermatol 2007; 157 (4): 723-729.
20. Gelpi CB, Jacob SE,. Instructions for educating patients on ROAT testing in conjunction with patch testing. Dermatol Nurs 2008; 20 (2): 139,. 143.
21. Johansen JD, Bruze M, Andersen KE, The repeated open application test: suggestions for a scale of evaluation. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39 (2): 95-96.