The impact of patient and public involvement in the work of the Dementias & Neurodegenerative Diseases Research Network (DeNDRoN): Case studies

Health Expectations

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 351-361

  Iliffe, Steve ^a   Mcgrath, Terry ^b   Mitchell, Douglas ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Environmental Co ordination Unit   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL PRESTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Neurodegenerative diseases; Patient and public involvement; Research networks

Indexed keywords

DONEPEZIL; INDAN DERIVATIVE; MEMANTINE; NOOTROPIC AGENT; PIPERIDINE DERIVATIVE;

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ARTICLE; CONSUMER; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DEMENTIA; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RESEARCH NETWORKS;

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES; PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; RESEARCH NETWORKS;

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DEMENTIA; HUMANS; INDANS; MEMANTINE; NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES; NOOTROPIC AGENTS; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PIPERIDINES;

EID: 84887974163     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00728.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Department of Health. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care, 2nd edn, London: Department of Health, 2005.
2. Staley K. Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in the NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE, 2009.
3. Staniszewska S, Herron-Marx S, Mockford C. Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement: the need for an evidence base. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2008; 20: 373-374.
4. Thornton H. Patients and health professionals working together to improve clinical research: where are we going?European Journal of Cancer, 2006; 42: 2454-2458.
5. Hanley B, Truesdale A, King A, Elbourne D, Chalmers I. Involving consumers in designing, conducting and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. BMJ, 2001; 322: 519-523.
6. Telford R, Boote J, Cooper C. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus studyHealth Expectations, 2004; 7: 209-220.
7. Thornton H, Dixon-Woods M. Recruitment of women into trials. Lancet, 2002; 359: 164.
8. Alzheimers Society. The Quality research in dementia consumer network. Available at: http://www.alzheimers.org.uk/site/scripts/documents.php?categoryID=200296, accessed 26 August 2011.
9. Boote J, Baird W, Beecroft C. Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy, 2010; 95: 10-23.
10. Guarino P, Elbourne D, Carpenter J, Peduzzi P. Consumer involvement in consent document development; a multicentre cluster randomised trial to assess study participants' understanding. Clinical Trials, 2006; 3: 19-30.
11. Abma T. Patient participation in health research: research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qualitative Health Research, 2005; 15: 1310.
12. Becker S, Sempik J, Bryman A. Advocates, Agnostics and Adversaries: researchers' perceptions of service user involvement in social policy research. Social Policy & Society, 2010; 9: 355-366.
13. Howe A, Delaney S, Romero J, Tinsley A, Vicary P. Public involvement in health research: a case study of one NHS project over 5years. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 2010; 11: 17-28.
14. Yin RK. Applications of Case Study Research, 2nd edn. London: Sage, 2003: xi-xvii.
15. Swanborn P. Case Study Research: What, Why and How? London: Sage, 2010: 33.
16. Yin RK. Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Services Research, 1999; 34 (5 Pt 2): 1209-1224.
17. Staniszewska S. Patient and Public Involvement in Research. Does it Really Make a Difference? Society of Academic Primary Care conference, July 8th 2010, Norwich.
18. Firestone WA. Alternative arguments for generalising from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 1993; 22: 16-23.
19. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Sage, 1985.
20. Swanborn P. A common base for quality control criteria in quantitative and qualitative research. Quality & Quantity, 1996; 30: 19-35.