Comparison of the Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane Combined with Remifentanil on Transcranial Electric Motor-evoked and Somatosensory-evoked Potential Monitoring during Brainstem Surgery

Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 282-288

  Hernández Palazón, Joaquín ^a   Izura, Virginia ^b   Fuentes Garciá, Diego ^a   Piqueras Pérez, Claudio ^b   Doménech Asensi, Paloma ^a   Falcón Aranã, Luis ^a  

^a Departments of Anesthesia   (Spain)

^b Virgen de la Arrixaca Children's Hospital   (Spain)

Author keywords

brainstem; monitoring; propofol; sevoflurane; somatosensory evoked potentials; surgery; transcranial electric motor evoked potentials

Indexed keywords

CISATRACURIUM; EPHEDRINE; MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; SEVOFLURANE; ETHER DERIVATIVE; INHALATION ANESTHETIC AGENT; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENT; PIPERIDINE DERIVATIVE;

ABDUCTOR HALLUCIS; ABDUCTOR POLLICIS BREVIS; ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BISPECTRAL INDEX; BODY TEMPERATURE; BRAIN SURGERY; BRAINSTEM SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DOSE REDUCTION; DRUG EFFECT; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; LOW DRUG DOSE; MALE; MUSCLE RELAXATION; NERVE STIMULATION; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PATIENT MONITORING; POSTERIOR TIBIAL NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TIBIALIS ANTERIOR MUSCLE; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRIC MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIAL; URINE VOLUME; ADOLESCENT; AGED; ANESTHESIA LEVEL; BRAIN STEM; DRUG EFFECTS; ELECTROSTIMULATION; INNERVATION; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIAL; NEUROSURGERY; PROCEDURES; SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED POTENTIAL; SURGERY; TIBIAL NERVE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; BRAIN STEM; CONSCIOUSNESS MONITORS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING; MALE; METHYL ETHERS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE RELAXATION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; PIPERIDINES; PROPOFOL; TIBIAL NERVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84942197941     PISSN: 08984921     EISSN: 15371921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000157     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Sala F, Manganotti P, Tramontano V, et al. Monitoring of motor pathways during brain stem surgery: what we have achieved and what we still miss? Neurophysiol Clin. 2007;37:399-406.
2. Sloan TB, Janik D, Jameson L. Multimodality monitoring of the central system using motor-evoked potentials. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21:560-564.
3. Manninen PH, Lam AM, Nicholas JF. The effects of isofluranenitrous oxide anesthesia on brainstem auditory evoked potentials in humans. Anesth Analg. 1985;64:43-47.
4. Drummond JC, Todd MM, Sang H. The effect of high dose sodium tiopental on brain stem auditory and median nerve somatosensory evoked response in humans. Anesthesiology. 1985;63:249-254.
5. Nathan N, Tabaraud F, Lacroix F, et al. Influence of propofol concentrations on multipulse transcranial motor evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:493-497.
6. Sloan TB, Toleikis JR, Toleikis SC, et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery with total intravenous anesthesia or balanced anesthesia with 3% desflurane. Clin Monit Comput. 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9571-9. [Epub ahead of print].
7. Boisseau N, Madany M, Staccini P, et al. Comparison of the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:785-789.
8. Lo YL, Dan YF, Tan YE, et al. Intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring in scoliosis surgery: comparison of desflurane/nitrous oxide with propofol total intravenous anesthetic regimens. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2006;18:211-214.
9. Li F, Gorji R, Allott G, et al. The usefulness of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in cervical spine surgery: a retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2012;24:185-190.
10. Weinzierl MR, Reinacher P, Gilsbach JM, et al. Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra-and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations. Neurosurg Rev. 2007;30:109-116.
11. Robinson BJ, Uhrich TD, Ebert TJ. A review of recovery from sevoflurane anaesthesia: comparisons with isoflurane and propofol including meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999; 43:185-190.
12. Favetta P, Degoute CS, Perdrix JP, et al. Propofol metabolites in man following propofol induction and maintenance. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:653-658.
13. Warner DS, Hindman BJ, Todd MM, et al. Intracranial pressure and hemodynamic effects of remifentanil versus alfentanil in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 1996; 83:348-353.
14. Lieberman JA, Feiner J, Lyon R, et al. Effect of hemorrhage and hypotension on transcranial motor-evoked potentials in swine. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:1109-1119.
15. Chong CT, Manninen P, Sivanaser V, et al. Direct comparison of the effect of desflurane and sevoflurane on intraoperative motor evoked potentials monitoring. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2014;26:306-312.
16. Shida Y, Shida C, Hiratsuka N, et al. High-frequency stimulation restored motor-evoked potentials to the baseline level in the upper extremities but not in the lower extremities under sevoflurane anesthesia in spine surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2012;24:113-120.
17. Lyon R, Feiner J, Lieberman JA. Progressive suppression of motor evoked potentials during general anesthesia. The phenomenon of "Anesthetic Fade." J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005;17:13-19.
18. Tamkus AA, Rice KS, Kim HL. Differential rates of false-positive findings in transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring when using inhalational anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia during spine surgeries. Spine J. 2014;14:1440-1446.
19. Reinacher PC, Priebe HJ, Blumrich W, et al. The effects of stimulation pattern and sevoflurane concentration on intraoperative motor-evoked potentials. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:888-895.
20. Yang J, Huang Z, Shu H, et al. Improving successful rate of transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials monitoring during spinal surgery in young children. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:980-984.
21. Sloan TB. Anesthetics effects on electrophysiologic recording. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;15:217-226.
22. American Electroencephalographic Society. Guideline eleven: guidelines for intraoperative monitoring of sensory evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;11:77-87.
23. Sloan TB. Muscle relaxant use during intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013;27:35-46.
24. Sekimoto K, Nishikawa K, Ishizeki J, et al. The effects of volatile anesthetics on intraoperative monitoring of myogenic motor-evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation and on partial neuromuscular blockade during propofol/fentanyl/nitrous oxide anesthesia in humans. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2006;18:106-111.
25. Sloan TB, Mongan P, Lyda C, et al. Lidocaine infusion adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia reduces the total dose of propofol during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2014;28:139-147.