Assessing risk in sustainable construction using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM)

Cognition, Technology and Work

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 559-573

  Rosa, Lucio Villarinho ^a   Haddad, Assed Naked ^b   de Carvalho, Paulo Victor Rodrigues ^c  

^a FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^c INSTITUTO DE ENGENHARIA NUCLEAR   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Functional Resonance Analysis Method; Green building; Occupational risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CONTRACTORS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; RESONANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

FUNCTIONAL RESONANCE; FUNCTIONAL RESONANCE ANALYSIS METHODS (FRAM); GREEN BUILDINGS; HEALTH AND SAFETY; MULTIPLE CONTRACTORS; PERFORMANCE VARIABILITY; PRELIMINARY HAZARD ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION;

OCCUPATIONAL RISKS;

EID: 84942194877     PISSN: 14355558     EISSN: 14355566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-015-0337-z     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ali HH, Nsairat SF (2008) Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries: case of Jordan. Build Environ 44:1053–1064
2. Andersen S, Mostue BA (2012) Risk analysis and risk management approaches applied to the petroleum industry and their applicability to IO concepts. Saf Sci 50:2010–2019
3. Andersson N, Broberg A, Braberg A, Janlert L, Jonsson E, Holmlund K, Pettersson J (2002) Emergent interaction: a pré-study. Department of Computing Science, Umea University, Umea
4. Aneziris ON, Topali E, Papazoglou IA (2012) Occupational risk of building construction. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 105:36–46
5. ASTM (2011) E 2114-01 Standard, terminology for sustainability relative to the performance of buildings. ASTM International
6. Badri A, Nadeau S, Gbodossou A (2012) Proposal of a risk-factor-based analytical approach for integrating occupational health and safety into project risk evaluation. Accid Anal Prev 48:223–234
7. Bereton S, Mclouth L, Odell B, Singh M, Trent M, Yatabe J (1997) Overview of the preliminary safety analysis of the national ignition facility. J Fusion Energy 16:85–94
8. Bibbiy A (2010) Empleos verdes en La construcción: Cambios pequeños, gran efecto. Trabajo, La Revista de La OIT 70:38–41
9. Carvalho PVR (2011) The use of Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) in a mid-air collision to understand some characteristics of the air traffic management system resilience. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:1482–1498
10. Chang KF, Chiang CM, Chou PC (2007) Adapting aspects of GBTool 2005 – searching for suitability in Taiwan. Build Environ 42:310–316
11. Chen H (2010) Green and healthy jobs for labor occupational health program. The Center for Construction Research and Training Report. University of California at Berkeley. http://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/publications/Green-Healthy%20Jobs%20fnl%20for%20posting.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2012
12. Costa HG (2006) Multicriteria decision aid_ AHP. Abepro, Rio de Janeiro
13. Ding GKC (2008) Sustainable construction: the role environmental assessment tools. J Environ Manag 86:451–464
14. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) (2012) Safety of nanomaterials in cosmetic products. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Cosmetics/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/UCM300932.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2013
15. Fung IW, Lo TY, Tung KCF (2012) Towards a better reliability of risk assessment: development of a qualitative and quantitative risk evaluation model (Q2REM) for different trades of construction works in Hong Kong. Accid Anal Prev 48:167–184
16. Fung IWH, Tam VWY, Lo TY, Lu LLH (2010) Developing a risk assessment model for construction safety. Int J Project Manag 28:593–600
17. Gambatese J, Rajendran S, Behm M (2007) Green design and construction: understanding the effects on construction worker safety and health. Prof Saf 52:5–28
18. Geetha MW, Xiuwen SD, Ted M, Elizabeth H, Yurong M (2007) Costs of occupational injuries in construction in the United States. Accid Anal Prev 39:1258–1266
19. Gomes LFAM, Araya M, Carignano C (2004) Decision-making in complex scenarios: introduction to discrete methods of multicriteria decision. Pioneira, São Paulo
20. Grecco CHS, Vidal MCR, Cosenza CAN, Santos IJAL, Carvalho PVR (2014) Safety culture assessment: a fuzzy model for improving safety performance in a radioactive installation. Prog Nucl Energy 70:71–83
21. Guranli GE, Mungen U (2009) An occupational safety risk analysis method at construction sites using fuzzy sets. Int J Ind Ergon 39:371–387
22. Hollnagel E (2004) Barriers and accident prevention. Ashgate, Aldershot
23. Hollnagel E (2007) Why do we need resilience engineering? http://www.sites.google.com/site/erikhollnagel2/whatisresilienceengineering%3F. Accessed 17 Jan 2011
24. Hollnagel E (2012) FRAM: the functional resonance analysis methods. Ashgate, Aldershot
25. Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Levenson N (2006) Resilience engineering: concepts e precepts. Ashgate, Aldershot
26. ILO (International Labor Organization) (2009) Inspecting occupational safety and health in the construction industry. International Training Centre ISBN 978-92-9049-489-8
27. ISO/IEC (2009) Risk management: risk assessment techniques ISO/IEC 31010. International Organization for Standardization/International Eletrotechinical Commission
28. Jou Y, Lin C, Yenn T, Yang C, Yang L, Tsai R (2009) The implementation of a human factors engineering checklist for human–system interfaces upgrade in nuclear power plants. Saf Sci 47:1016–1025
29. Levenson N (2004) A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf Sci 42:237–270
30. Macdonald MA, Lipscomb JH, Bondy J, Glazner J (2009) Safety is everyone’s job: the key to safety on a large university construction site. J Saf Res 40:53–61
31. Mehta RK, Agnew MJ (2010) Analysis of individual and occupational risk factors on task performance and biomechanical demands for simulated drilling task. Int J Ind Ergon 40:584–591
32. Mitropoulos P, Namboodiri M (2011) New method for measuring the safety risk of construction activities: task demand assessment. J Constr Eng Manag 137:30–38
33. Navon R, Kolton O (2006) Model for automated monitoring of all hazards in building construction. J Constr Eng Manag 132:733–740
34. Nieto-Morote A, Ruz-Vila F (2009) A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment. Int J Project Manag 29:220–231
35. NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) (2009) Summary of the making green jobs safe workshop. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2011-201/pdfs/2011-201.pdf. Accessed 12 Jun 2012
36. Ortiz O, Castells F, Sonnemann G (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater 23:28–39
37. Papadopoulos G, Georgiadou P, Papazoglou C, Michaliou K (2010) Occupational and public health and safety in a changing work environment: an integrated approach for risk assessment and prevention. Saf Sci 48:943–949
38. Parra-Lopez C, Calatravra J, Haro-Gimenez T (2007) A multi-criteria evaluation of the environmental performances of conventional, organic and integrated olive-growing systems in the south of Spain based on experts knowledge. Renew Agric Food Syst 22(3):189–203
39. Perez-Alonso J, Carreno-Ortega A, Callejon-Ferre AJ, Vaquez-Cabrera J (2011) Preventive activity in the greenhouse-construction industry of south-eastern Spain. Saf Sci 49:345–354
40. Peterson DL, Silsbec DG, Sdmoldt DL (1995) A planning approach for developing inventory and monitoring programs in natural parks - Work document. Natural Resources Report. http://www.nature.nps.gov/im/monitor/peterson.pdf. Acessed 15 June 2009
41. Pinto A, Nunes IL, Ribeiro LA (2011) Occupational risk assessment in construction industry: overview and reflection. Saf Sci 49:616–624
42. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York
43. Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26
44. Saurin TA, Junior GCC (2011) Evaluation and improvement of a method for assessing HSMS from the resilience engineering perspective: a case study of an electricity distributor. Saf Sci 49:355–368
45. SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly-Identified Health Risks) (2007) The appropriateness of the risk-assessment methodology in accordance with the technical guidance. Documents for new and existing substances for assessing the risks of nanomaterials. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_010.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2012
46. Schulte PA, Heidel D, Okun A, Branche C (2010) Making green jobs safe. Ind Health 48:377–379
47. Sennett R (1998) The corrosion of character: the personal. Consequences of work in the new capitalism. W.W. Norton, London
48. Steen R, Aven T (2011) A risk perspective suitable for resilience engineering. Saf Sci 49:292–297
49. Swuste P, Gulijk CV, Zwaard W (2010) Safety metaphors and theories: a review of occupational safety literature of the US, UK and the Netherlands, till the first part of the 20th century. Saf Sci 48:1000–1018
50. Tiwari DN, Loof R, Paudyal GN (1999) Environmental-economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques. Agric Syst 60(2):99–112
51. USGBC (United States Green Building Council) (2009) LEED 2009 for new construction and major renovations rating system. http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=5546. Accessed 21 Jun 2011
52. Vidal AL, Sahin E, Martelli N, Berhoune N, Bonan B (2010) Applying AHP to select drugs to be produced by anticipation in a chemotherapy compounding unit. Expert Syst Appl 37:1528–1534
53. Woods DD (2006) Essential characteristics of resilience. In: Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Levenson N (eds) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate, Aldershot