Patient adaptive maximal resolution magnetic resonance myocardial stress perfusion imaging

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 946-953

  Ripley, David P ^a   McDiarmid, Adam K ^a   Kidambi, Ananth ^a   Uddin, Akhlaque ^a   Swoboda, Peter P ^a   Musa, Tarique A ^a   Erhayiem, Bara ^a   Bainbridge, Gavin J ^a   Greenwood, John P ^a   Plein, Sven ^a   Higgins, David M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

cardiovascular perfusion imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; perfusion magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

GADOBUTROL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BODY SIZE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PATIENT ADAPTIVE PERFUSION IMAGING; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; AGED; CARDIAC GATED IMAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EXERCISE TEST; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; BODY SIZE; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EXERCISE TEST; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PRECISION MEDICINE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84941996565     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24846     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Jaarsma C, Leiner T, Bekkers SC, et al., Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 1719-1728.
2. Tsao J, Kozerke S,. MRI temporal acceleration techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36: 543-560.
3. Kozerke S, Plein S,. Accelerated CMR using zonal, parallel and prior knowledge driven imaging methods. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10: 29.
4. Wieben O, Francois C, Reeder SB,. Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges. Eur J Radiol 2008; 65: 15-28.
5. Motwani M, Maredia N, Fairbairn TA, et al., High-resolution versus standard-resolution cardiovascular MR myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 306-313.
6. Cheng AS, Pegg TJ, Karamitsos TD, et al., Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-Tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-Tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 2440-2449.
7. Thiele H, Plein S, Ridgway JP, et al., Effects of missing dynamic images on myocardial perfusion reserve index calculation: comparison between an every heartbeat and an alternate heartbeat acquisition. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003; 5: 343-352.
8. Diamond GA, Staniloff HM, Forrester JS, Pollock BH, Swan HJ,. Computer-assisted diagnosis in the noninvasive evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 1: 444-455.
9. Assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected cardiac origin (CG95). London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2010.
10. Messroghli DR, Bainbridge GJ, Alfakih K, et al., Assessment of regional left ventricular function: accuracy and reproducibility of positioning standard short-axis sections in cardiac MR imaging. Radiology 2005; 235: 229-236.
11. Tong CY, Prato FS,. A novel fast T1-mapping method. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4: 701-708.
12. Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, et al., Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 35.
13. Plein S, Ryf S, Schwitter J, Radjenovic A, Boesiger P, Kozerke S,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI accelerated with k-t sense. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 777-785.
14. Reeder SB, Wintersperger BJ, Dietrich O, et al., Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 748-754.
15. Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, et al., Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 453-460.
16. Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N, et al., Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: the secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012; 14: 61.
17. Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E,. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 91.
18. Plein S, Schwitter J, Suerder D, Greenwood JP, Boesiger P, Kozerke S,. k-Space and time sensitivity encoding-accelerated myocardial perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T. Radiology 2008; 249: 493-500.
19. Maredia N, Radjenovic A, Kozerke S, Larghat A, Greenwood JP, Plein S,. Effect of improving spatial or temporal resolution on image quality and quantitative perfusion assessment with k-t SENSE acceleration in first-pass CMR myocardial perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 1616-1624.