Sustained magnetic responses in temporal cortex reflect instantaneous significance of approaching and receding sounds

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Bach, Dominik R ^a,b   Furl, Nicholas ^a,c   Barnes, Gareth ^a   Dolan, Raymond J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SOUND INTENSITY; TEMPORAL CORTEX; WHITE NOISE; EVOKED RESPONSE; HEARING; PHYSIOLOGY; SOUND; TEMPORAL LOBE; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; SOUND; TEMPORAL LOBE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84941979007     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134060     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bach DR, Schachinger H, Neuhoff JG, Esposito F, Salle FD, Lehmann C, et al. Rising sound intensity: an intrinsic warning cue activating the amygdala. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 18(1):145-50. PMID: 17490992
2. Neuhoff JG. Perceptual bias for rising tones. Nature. 1998; 395(6698):123-4. PMID: 9744266
3. Neuhoff JG. An adaptive bias in the perception of looming auditory motion. Ecological Psychology. 2001; 132 87-110.
4. Ghazanfar AA, Neuhoff JG, Logothetis NK. Auditory looming perception in rhesus monkeys. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002; 99(24):15755-7.
5. Bach DR, Neuhoff JG, Perrig W, Seifritz E. Looming sounds as warning signals: the function of motion cues. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2009; 74(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.06.004 PMID: 19615414
6. Tajadura-Jimenez A, Valjamae A, Asutay E, Vastfjall D. Embodied auditory perception: the emotional impact of approaching and receding sound sources. Emotion. 2010; 10(2):216-29. Epub 2010/04/07. doi: 10.1037/a0018422 PMID: 20364898.
7. Maier JX, Neuhoff JG, Logothetis NK, Ghazanfar AA. Multisensory integration of looming signals by rhesus monkeys. Neuron. 2004; 43(2):177-81. PMID: 15260954
8. Leo F, Romei V, Freeman E, Ladavas E, Driver J. Looming sounds enhance orientation sensitivity for visual stimuli on the same side as such sounds. Exp Brain Res. 2011; 213(2-3):193-201. Epub 2011/06/07. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2742-8 PMID: 21643714; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3155046.
9. Romei V, Murray MM, Cappe C, Thut G. Preperceptual and stimulus-selective enhancement of lowlevel human visual cortex excitability by sounds. Current biology: CB. 2009; 19(21):1799-805. Epub 2009/10/20. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.027 PMID: 19836243.
10. Neuhoff JG, Planisek R, Seifritz E. Adaptive sex differences in auditory motion perception: looming sounds are special. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2009; 35(1):225-34. doi: 10.1037/a0013159 PMID: 19170484
11. Schiff W, Oldak R. Accuracy of judging time to arrival: effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1990; 16(2):303-16. PMID: 2142201
12. Seifritz E, Neuhoff JG, Bilecen D, Scheffler K, Mustovic H, Schachinger H, et al. Neural processing of auditory looming in the human brain. Current Biology. 2002; 12(24):2147-51. PMID: 12498691
13. Maier JX, Ghazanfar AA. Looming biases in monkey auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(15):4093-100. PMID: 17428987
14. Maier JX, Chandrasekaran C, Ghazanfar AA. Integration of bimodal looming signals through neuronal coherence in the temporal lobe. Current Biology. 2008; 18(13):963-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.043 PMID: 18585039
15. Gordon MS, Russo FA, MacDonald E. Spectral information for detection of acoustic time to arrival. Atten Percept Psycho. 2013; 75(4):738-50. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0424-2 PMID: WOS:000317924400012.
16. Worsley KJ, Marrett S, Neelin P, Vandal AC, Friston KJ, Evans AC. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Human brain mapping. 1996; 4(1):58-73. Epub 1996/01/01. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1996)4:1<58::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1996)4:1〈58::AID-HBM4〉3.0.CO;2-O PMID: 20408186.
17. Friston K, Harrison L, Daunizeau J, Kiebel S, Phillips C, Trujillo-Barreto N, et al. Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem. NeuroImage. 2008; 39(3):1104-20. Epub 2007/11/13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.048 PMID: 17997111.
18. Clarke SE, Naud R, Longtin A, Maler L. Speed-invariant encoding of looming object distance requires power law spike rate adaptation. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA. 2013; 110(33):13624-9. Epub 2013/07/31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306428110 PMID: 23898185; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3746935.
19. Anderson KC, Siegel RM. Optic flow selectivity in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area, STPa, of the behaving monkey. J Neurosci. 1999; 19(7):2681-92. PMID: 10087081
20. Goodale MA, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in neurosciences. 1992; 15(1):20-5. Epub 1992/01/01. PMID: 1374953.
21. Cappe C, Thut G, Romei V, Murray MM. Selective integration of auditory-visual looming cues by humans. Neuropsychologia. 2009; 47(4):1045-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.003 PMID: 19041883
22. Gordon MS, Rosenblum LD. Effects of intrastimulus modality change on audiovisual time-to-arrival judgments. Perception and Psychophysics. 2005; 67(4):580-94. PMID: 16134453
23. Sutherland CA, Thut G, Romei V. Hearing brighter: changing in-depth visual perception through looming sounds. Cognition. 2014; 132(3):312-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.011 PMID: 24858108.
24. Cappe C, Thelen A, Romei V, Thut G, Murray MM. Looming signals reveal synergistic principles of multisensory integration. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(4):1171-82. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5517-11.2012 PMID: 22279203.
25. Tyll S, Bonath B, Schoenfeld MA, Heinze HJ, Ohl FW, Noesselt T. Neural basis of multisensory looming signals. NeuroImage. 2013; 65:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.056 PMID: 23032489.
26. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3(3):201-15. Epub 2002/05/08. doi: 10.1038/nrn755 PMID: 11994752.
27. Stein BE, Stanford TR, Ramachandran R, Perrault TJ Jr., Rowland BA. Challenges in quantifying multisensory integration: alternative criteria, models, and inverse effectiveness. Exp Brain Res. 2009; 198 (2-3):113-26. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1880-8 PMID: 19551377; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3056521.
28. Sander D, Grafman J, Zalla T. The human amygdala: An evolved system for relevance detection. Reviews in the Neurosciences. 2003; 14 (4):303-16. PMID: 14640318
29. Zald DH. The human amygdala and the emotional evaluation of sensory stimuli. Brain Research Reviews. 2003; 41 88-123. PMID: 12505650
30. LeDoux JE. Emotion circuits in the brain. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000; 23:155-84. PMID: 10845062
31. Kiani R, Shadlen MN. Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex. Science. 2009; 324(5928):759-64. doi: 10.1126/science.1169405 PMID: 19423820
32. Letzkus JJ, Wolff SB, Meyer EM, Tovote P, Courtin J, Herry C, et al. A disinhibitory microcircuit for associative fear learning in the auditory cortex. Nature. 2011; 480(7377):331-5. doi: 10.1038/nature10674 PMID: 22158104
33. Sacco T, Sacchetti B. Role of Secondary Sensory Cortices in Emotional Memory Storage and Retrieval in Rats. Science. 2010; 329(5992):649-56. doi: 10.1126/Science.1183165 PMID: ISI:000280602700030.
34. Uppenkamp S, Rohl M. Human auditory neuroimaging of intensity and loudness. Hear Res. 2013. Epub 2013/08/27. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.005 PMID: 23973563.
35. Edworthy J, Loxley S, Dennis I. Improving Auditory Warning Design - Relationship between Warning Sound Parameters and Perceived Urgency. Hum Factors. 1991; 33(2):205-31. PMID: WOS:A1991FM89700006.