Human auditory neuroimaging of intensity and loudness

Hearing Research

Volumn 307, Issue , 2014, Pages 65-73

  Uppenkamp, Stefan ^a   Röhl, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM EXAMINATION; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN SIZE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEARING; HEARING DISORDER; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; PERSONALITY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOUND INTENSITY; SOUND PRESSURE;

AC; AUDITORY CORTEX; BLOOD OXYGEN LEVEL DEPENDENT; BOLD; CN; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; EPI; FAMILY WISE ERROR; FWE; GTS; GTT; GYRUS TEMPORALIS SUPERIOR; GYRUS TEMPORALIS TRANSVERSUS; HESCHL'S GYRUS; HG; IC; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; MEDIAL GENICULATE BODY; MGB; PAC; PLANUM TEMPORALE; PRIMARY AUDITORY CORTEX; PT; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SNR; SOC; SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL; SPL; SUPERIOR OLIVARY COMPLEX; THREE-DIMENSIONAL PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRE; TPQ;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION;

EID: 84889647009     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.005     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Arieh Y., Marks L.E. Measurement of loudness, Part II: context effects. Loudness. Springer Handb Auditory Res 2011, vol. 37:57-87. Springer, New York.
2. Bilecen D., Seifritz E., Radu E.W., Schmid N., Wetzel S., Probst R., Scheffler K. Cortical reorganization after acute unilateral hearing loss traced by fMRI. Neurology 2000, 54:765-767.
3. Bilecen D., Seifritz E., Scheffler K., Henning J., Schulte A.-C. Amplitopicity of the human auditory cortex: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2002, 17:710-718.
4. Brand T., Hohmann V. Effect of hearing loss, centre frequency, and bandwidth on the shape of loudness functions in categorical loudness scaling. Audiology 2001, 40:92-103.
5. Brechmann A., Baumgart F., Scheich H. Sound-level-dependent representation of frequency modulations in human auditory cortex: a low-noise fMRI study. J.Neurophysiol. 2002, 87:423-433.
6. Buus S., Florentine M. Growth of loudness in listeners with cochlear hearing losses: recruitment reconsidered. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2002, 3:120-139.
7. Chalupper J., Fastl H. Dynamic loudness model (DLM) for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 2002, 88:378-386.
8. Cloninger C.R. Asystematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants - a proposal. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1987, 44:573-588.
9. Cox R.M., Alexander G.C., Gray G.A. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes. Ear Hear. 2007, 28:141-162.
10. Edmister W.B., Talavage T.M., Ledden P.J., Weisskoff R.M. Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 7:89-97.
11. Elberling C. Loudness scaling revisited. J.Am. Acad. Audiol. 1999, 10:248-260.
12. Ellermeier W., Eigenstetter M., Zimmer K. Psychoacoustic correlates of individual noise sensitivity. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 109:1464-1473.
13. Ernst S.M.A., Verhey J.L., Uppenkamp S. Spatial dissociation of changes of level and signal-to-noise ratio in auditory cortex for tones in noise. NeuroImage 2008, 43:321-328.
14. Fletcher H. Auditory patterns. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1940, 12:47-65.
15. Fletcher H., Munson W.A. Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 1933, 5:82-108.
16. Florentine M. Loudness. Loudness. Springer Handb. Auditory Res 2011, vol. 37:1-15. Springer, New York.
17. Gaab N., Gaser C., Zaehle T., Jancke L., Schlaug G. Functional anatomy of pitch memory - an fMRI study with sparse temporal sampling. Neuroimage 2003, 19:1417-1426.
18. Gaab N., Gabrieli J.D.E., Glover G.H. Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2007, 28:703-720.
19. Gaab N., Gabrieli J.D.E., Glover G.H. Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2007, 28:721-732.
20. Griffiths T.D., Uppenkamp S., Johnsrude I., Josephs O., Patterson R.D. Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:633-637.
21. Gu J.W., Halpin C.F., Nam E.C., Levine R.A., Melcher J.R. Tinnitus, diminished sound-level tolerance, and elevated auditory activity in humans with clinically normal hearing sensitivity. J.Neurophysiol. 2010, 104:3361-3370.
22. Gutschalk A., Patterson R.D., Rupp A., Uppenkamp S., Scherg M. Sustained magnetic fields reveal separate sites for sound level and temporal regularity in human auditory cortex. Neuroimage 2002, 15:207-216.
23. Hall D.A., Summerfield A.Q., Goncalves M.S., Foster J.R., Palmer A.R., Bowtell R.W. Time-course of the auditory BOLD response to scanner noise. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000, 43:601-606.
24. Hall D.A., Haggard M.P., Akeroyd M.A., Palmer A.R., Summerfield A.Q., Bowtell R.W. Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 109:1559-1570.
25. Hall D.A., Haggard M.P., Akeroyd M.A., Palmer A.R., Summerfield A.Q., Elliott M.R., Gurney E.M., Bowtell R.W. "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 7:213-223.
26. Hart H.C., Palmer A.R., Hall D.A. Heschl's gyrus is more sensitive to tone level than non-primary auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 2002, 171:177-190.
27. Hart H.C., Hall D.A., Palmer A.R. The sound-level-dependent growth in the extent of fMRI activation in Heschl's gyrus is different for low- and high-frequency tones. Hear. Res. 2003, 179:104-112.
28. Heeren W., Hohmann V., Appell J.E., Verhey J.L. Relation between loudness in categorical units and loudness in phons and sones. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2013, 133:EL314-EL319.
29. Hegerl U., Gallinat J., Mrowinski D. Intensity dependence of auditory evoked dipole source activity. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1994, 17:1-13.
30. Heil P., Rajan R., Irvine D.R.F. Topographic representation of tone intensity along the isofrequency axis of cat primary auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 1994, 76:188-202.
31. Heller O. Hörfeldaudiometrie mit dem Verfahren der Kategorienunterteilung. Psychologische Beiträge 1985, 27:478-493.
32. Hellman R.P. Stability of individual loudness functions obtained by magnitude estimation and production. Percept. Psychophys. 1981, 29:63-70.
33. Inglese M., Ge Y. Quantitative MRI: hidden age-related changes in brain tissue. Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004, 15:355-363.
34. Jäncke L., Shah N.J., Posse S., Grosse-Ryuken M., Müller-Gärtner H.-W. Intensity coding of auditory stimuli: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:875-883.
35. Jäncke L., Mirzazade S., Shah N.J. Attention modulates activity in the primary and the secondary auditory cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects. Neurosci. Lett. 1999, 266:125-128.
36. Jestaedt W., Leibold L.J. Loudness in the laboratory, part I: steady-state sound. Loudness. Springer Handb. Auditory Res 2011, vol. 37:109-144. Springer, New York.
37. Juckel G., Schmidt L.G., Rommelspacher H., Hegerl U. The tridimensional personality questionnaire and the intensity dependence of auditory evoked dipole source activity. Biol. Psychiatry 1995, 37:311-317.
38. Katzenell U., Segal S. Hyperacusis: review and clinical guidelines. Otol. Neurotol. 2001, 22:321-326.
39. Langers D.R.M., Backes W.H., van Dijk P. Spectrotemporal features of the auditory cortex: the activation in response to dynamic ripples. Neuroimage 2003, 20:265-275.
40. Langers D.R.M., van Dijk P., Schoenmaker E.S., Backes W.H. fMRI activation in relation to sound intensity and loudness. Neuroimage 2007, 35:709-718.
41. Lanting C.P., de Kleine E., Bartels H., van Dijk P. Functional imaging of unilateral tinnitus using fMRI. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008, 128:415-421.
42. Lasota K.J., Ulmer J.L., Firszt J.B., Biswal B.B., Daniels D.L., Prost R.W. Intensity-dependent activation of the primary auditory cortex in functional magnetic resonance imaging. J.Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2003, 27:213-218.
43. Liem F., Lutz K., Luechinger R., Jäncke L., Meyer M. Reducing the interval between volume acquisitions improves ''sparse'' scanning protocols in event-related auditory fMRI. Brain Topogr. 2012, 25:182-193.
44. Lockwood A.H., Salvi R.J., Coad M.L., Arnold S.A., Wack D.S., Murphy B.W., Burkard R.F. The functional anatomy of the normal human auditory system: responses to 0.5 and 4.0 kHz tones at varied intensities. Cereb. Cortex 1999, 9:65-76.
45. Marks L.E., Florentine M. Measurement of loudness, Part I: methods, problems, and pitfalls. Loudness. Springer Handb. Auditory Res 2011, vol. 37:17-56. Springer, New York.
46. Mauermann M., Long G.R., Kollmeier B. Fine structure of hearing threshold and loudness perception. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116:1066-1080.
47. Millen S.J., Haughton V.M., Yetkin Z. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the central auditory pathway following speech and pure -tone stimuli. Laryngoscope 1995, 105:1305-1310.
48. Mohr C.M., King W.M., Freeman A.J., Briggs R.W., Leonard C.M. Influence of speech stimuli intensity on the activation of auditory cortex investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999, 105:2738-2745.
49. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. Arevision of Zwicker's loudness model. Acustica United with Acta Acustica 1996, 82:335-345.
50. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. Amodel of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory Neurosci. 1997, 3:289-311.
51. Mulert C., Jäger L., Propp S., Karch S., Störmann S., Pogarell O., Möller H.J., Juckel G., Hegerl U. Sound level dependence of the primary auditory cortex: simultaneous measurement with 61-channel EEG and fMRI. Neuroimage 2005, 28:49-58.
52. Olulade O., Hu S., Gonzalez-Castillo J., Tamer G.G., Luh W.M., Ulmer J.L., Talavage T.M. Assessment of temporal state-dependent interactions between auditory fMRI responses to desired and undesired acoustic sources. Hear. Res. 2011, 277:67-77.
53. Pantev C., Hoke M., Lehnertz K., Lütkenhöner B. Neuromagnetic evidence of an amplitopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1989, 72:225-231.
54. Pickles J.O. An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing 2012, Emerald. fourth ed.
55. 123I] ADAM brainstem binding correlates with the loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2008, 258:40-47.
56. Preyer S., Gummer A.W. Nonlinearity of mechanoelectrical transduction of outer hair cells as the source of nonlinear basilar-membrane motion and loudness recruitment. Audiol. Neurootol. 1996, 1:3-11.
57. Reiterer S., Erb M., Grodd W., Wildgruber D. Cerebral processing of timbre and loudness: fMRI evidence for a contribution of Broca's area to basic auditory discrimination. Brain Imaging Behav. 2008, 2:1-10.
58. Röhl M., Uppenkamp S. An auditory fMRI correlate of impulsivity. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 2010, 181:145-150.
59. Röhl M., Uppenkamp S. Neural coding of sound intensity and loudness in the human auditory system. J.Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2012, 13:369-379.
60. Röhl M., Kollmeier B., Uppenkamp S. Spectral loudness summation takes place in the primary auditory cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011, 32:1483-1496.
61. Scarff C.J., Dort J.,C., Eggermont J.J., Goodyear B.G. The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2004, 22:341-349.
62. Scharf B. Critical bands and the loudness of complex sounds near threshold. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 1959, 31:365-370.
63. Scharf B. Complex sounds and critical bands. Psychol. Bull. 1961, 58:205-217.
64. Schneider P., Sluming V., Roberts N., Scherg M., Goebel R., Specht H.J. Structural and functional asymmetry of lateral Heschl's gyrus reflects pitch perception preference. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1241-1247.
65. Schwarzbauer C., Davis M.H., Rodd J.M., Johnsrude I. Interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) imaging: a new sparse imaging method applied to auditory fMRI. Neuroimage 2006, 29:774-782.
66. Seifritz E., Neuhoff J.G., Bilecen D., Scheffler K., Mustovic H., Schächinger H., Elefante R., Di Salle F. Neural processing of auditory looming in the human brain. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:2147-2151.
67. Sieroka N., Dosch H.G., Specht H.J., Rupp A. Additional neuromagnetic source activity outside the auditory cortex in duration discrimination correlates with behavioural ability. Neuroimage 2003, 20:1697-1703.
68. Sigalovsky I.S., Melcher J.R. Effects of sound level on fMRI activation in human brainstem, thalamic and cortical centers. Hear. Res. 2006, 215:67-76.
69. Smeds K., Leijon A. Loudness and hearing loss. Loudness. Springer Handb. Auditory Res 2011, vol. 37:223-259. Springer, New York.
70. Soeta Y., Nakagawa S. Auditory evoked responses in human auditory cortex to the variation of sound intensity in an ongoing tone. Hear. Res. 2012, 287:67-75.
71. Stephens S.D.G. Personality and slope of loudness function. Q. J.Exp. Psychol. 1970, 22:9-13.
72. Stevens S.S. The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes - loudness. Am. J. Psychol. 1956, 69:1-25.
73. Strainer J.C., Ulmer J.L., Yetkin F.Z., Haughton V.M., Daniels D.L., Millen S.J. Functional MR of the primary auditory cortex: an analysis of pure tone activation and tone discrimination. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1997, 18:601-610.
74. Thaerig S., Behne N., Schadow J., Lenz D., Scheich H., Brechmann A., Herrmann C.S. Sound level dependence of auditory evoked potentials: simultaneous EEG recording and low-noise fMRI. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2008, 67:235-241.
75. Tumeh P.C., Alavi A., Houseni M., Greenfield A., Chryssikos T., Newberg A., Torigian D.A., Moonis G. Structural and functional imaging correlates for age-related changes in the brain. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2007, 37:69-87.
76. Uppenkamp S., Cicholewski A. Repräsentation von zeitlicher Lautheitssummation in fMRT-Aktivierungskarten. Fortschritte der Akustik - DAGA 2012 2012, 587-588. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Akustik e.V., Berlin. H. Hanselka (Ed.).
77. Woods D.L., Stecker G.C., Rinne T., Herron T.J., Cate A.D., Yund E.W., Liao I., Kang X. Functional maps of human auditory cortex: effects of acoustic features and attention. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(4):e5183. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005183.
78. Woods D.L., Herron T.J., Cate A.D., Yund E.W., Stecker G.C., Rinne T., Kang X. Functional properties of human auditory cortical fields. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2010, 4. article 155. 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00155.
79. Zaehle T., Wüstenberg T., Meyer M., Jäncke L. Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 20:2447-2456.
80. Zhang M., Zwislocki J.J. OHC response recruitment and its correlation with loudness recruitment. Hear. Res. 1995, 85:1-10.
81. Zwicker E. Über die Lautheit von ungedrosselten und gesdrosselten Schallen. Acustica 1963, 13:194-211.
82. Zwicker E., Scharf B. Amodel of loudness summation. Psychol. Rev. 1965, 72:3-26.
83. Zwicker E., Flottorp G., Stevens S.S. Critical bandwidths in loudness summation. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 1957, 29:548-557.