Identifying Opportunities for Virtual Reality Simulation in Surgical Education: A Review of the Proceedings from the Innovation, Design, and Emerging Alliances in Surgery (IDEAS) Conference: VR Surgery

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 514-521

  Olasky, Jaisa ^a   Sankaranarayanan, Ganesh ^b   Seymour, Neal E ^c   Magee, J Harvey ^d   Enquobahrie, Andinet ^e   Lin, Ming C ^f   Aggarwal, Rajesh ^g   Brunt, L Michael ^h   Schwaitzberg, Steven D ⁱ   Cao, Caroline G L ^j   De, Suvranu ^b   Jones, Daniel B ^k  

^a MOUNT AUBURN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e KITWARE INC   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^h WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCE   (United States)

^j WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

ergonomics; human factors study; image guided surgery; simulation; surgical education

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DECISION MAKING; E-MAIL; ELECTROSURGERY; HEALTH EDUCATOR; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT SAFETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RESIDENT; SIMULATION; SKILL; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; SYMPOSIUM; TRAINING; VIRTUAL REALITY; VIRTUAL REALITY SIMULATION; BIOENGINEERING; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICES; EDUCATION; PROCEDURES; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRENDS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84941948822     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: 15533514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1553350615583559     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Satava RM,. Virtual reality surgical simulator: The first steps. Surg Endosc. 1993; 7: 203-205.
2. Matsuda T, McDougall EM, Ono Y, et al. Positive correlation between motion analysis data on the LapMentor virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator and the results from videotape assessment of real laparoscopic surgeries. J Endourol. 2012; 26: 1506-1511.
3. Andreatta PB, Woodrum DT, Birkmeyer JD, et al. Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2006; 243: 854-860.
4. Van Sickle KR, Ritter EM, McClusky DA, et al. Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) learning center study. Surg Endosc. 2007: 21: 5-10.
5. Rivard JD, Vergis AS, Unger BJ, et al. Construct validity of individual and summary performance metrics associated with a computer-based laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28: 1921-1928.
6. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002; 236: 458-464.
7. Haque S, Srinivasan S,. A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality simulators. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006; 10: 51-58.
8. Sedlack RE, Kolars JC,. Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99: 33-37.
9. Engineering Grand Challenges. 14 Grand challenges for engineering. http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/challenges.aspx. Accessed January 23, 2014.
10. De Leo G, Diggs LA, Radici E, Mastaglio TW,. Measuring sense of presence and user characteristics to predict effective training in an online simulated virtual environment. Simul Healthc. 2014; 9: 1-6.
11. Govindaraju NK, Lin MC, Manocha D,. Fast and reliable collision culling using graphics hardware. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2006; 12: 143-154.
12. Govindaraju NK, Knott D, Jain N, et al. Interactive collision detection between deformable models using chromatic decomposition. ACM Trans Graphics. 2005; 24: 991-999.
13. Simulation Open Software Architecture. http://www.sofa-framework.org/home. Accessed March 12, 2014.
14. Darar S, Nunno A, Sankaranarayanan G, De S,. Microsoft Kinect based head tracking for life size collaborative surgical simulation environments (LS-CollaSSLE). Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 184: 109-113.
15. Li B, Sankaranarayanan G, Jones SB, et al. Preliminary validation of a novel VR2© (VR within VR) Simulator for Surgical Education. Poster presented at: 2014 Association of Surgical Education Meeting; Chicago, IL.
16. Scott DJ, Dunnington GL,. The new ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; 12: 213-221.
17. Okrainec A, Soper NJ, Swanstrom LL, Fried GM,. Trends and results of the first 5 years of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification testing. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25: 1192-1198.
18. Hafford ML, Van Sickle KR, Willis RE, et al. Ensuring competency: are fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training and certification necessary for practicing surgeons and operating room personnel? Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 118-126.
19. Feldman LS, Hagarty SE, Ghitulescu G, Stanbridge D, Fried GM,. Relationship between objective assessment of technical skills and subjective in-training evaluations in surgical residents. J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 198: 105-110.
20. Houck J, Kopietz CM, Shah BC, Goede MR, McBride CL, Oleynikov D,. Impact of advanced laparoscopy courses on present surgical practice. JSLS. 2013; 17: 174-177.
21. Stefanidis D, Acker CE, Swiderski D, Heniford BT, Greene FL,. Challenges during the implementation of a laparoscopic skills curriculum in a busy general surgery residency program. J Surg Educ. 2008; 65: 4-7.
22. Shamim Khan M, Ahmed K, Gavazzi A, et al. Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity. BJU Int. 2013; 111: 518-523.
23. Pentiak PA, Schuch-Miller D, Streetman RT, et al. Barriers to adoption of the surgical resident skills curriculum of the American College of Surgeons/Association of Program Directors in Surgery. J Surg. 2013; 154: 23-28.
24. Stefanidis D, Acker CE, Greene FL,. Performance goals on simulators boost resident motivation and skills laboratory attendance. J Surg Educ. 2010; 67: 66-70.
25. Henry B, Clark P, Sudan R,. Cost and logistics of implementing a tissue-based American College of Surgeons/Association of Program Directors in Surgery surgical skills curriculum for general surgery residents of all clinical years. Am J Surg. 2014; 207: 201-208.
26. Wong J, Bhattacharya G, Vance SJ, Bistolarides P, Merchant AM,. Construction and validation of a low-cost laparoscopic simulator for surgical education. J Surg Educ. 2013; 70: 443-450.
27. Nguyen PH, Acker CE, Heniford BT, Stefanidis D,. What is the cost associated with the implementation of the FLS program into a general surgery residency? Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 3216-3220.
28. Cost estimates of several virtual reality simulators. http://laparoscopy.blogs.com/laparoscopy-today/LaparoscopyTodayPDFs/Laparoscopy3-2.pdf. Accessed October 8, 2014.
29. Guerreschi P, Qassemyar A, Thevenet J, Hubert T, Fontaine C, Duquennoy-Martinot V,. Reducing the number of animals used for microsurgery training programs by using a task-trainer simulator. Lab Anim. 2014; 48: 72-77.
30. Bell RH,. Surgical council on resident education: a new organization devoted to graduate surgical education. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204: 341-346.
31. Surgical Council on Resident Education. Curriculum outline for general surgery residency. http://www.absurgery.org/xfer/curriculumoutline2013-14.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2014.
32. Glass CC, Acton RD, Blair PG, et al. American College of Surgeons/Association for Surgical Education medical student simulation-based surgical skills curriculum needs assessment. Am J Surg. 2014; 207: 165-169.
33. Patel V, Aggarwal R, Cohen D, Taylor D, Darzi A,. Implementation of an interactive virtual-world simulation for structured surgeon assessment of clinical scenarios. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 217: 270-279.
34. Patel V, Lee H, Taylor D, Aggarwal R, Kinross J, Darzi A,. Virtual worlds are an innovative tool for medical device training in a simulated environment. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012; 173: 338-343.
35. Arriaga AF, Gawande AA, Raemer DB, et al. Pilot testing of a model for insurer-driven, large-scale multicenter simulation training for operating room teams. Ann Surg. 2014; 259: 403-410.
36. ACGME Core Competencies. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/380-SummativeEvaluation-GPM-AA-04-10-2008.pdf. Accessed March 12, 2014.
37. Soler L, Nicolau S, Pessaux P, Mutter D, Marescaux J,. Real-time 3D image reconstruction guidance in liver resection surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2014; 3: 73-81.