Primary and secondary reconstruction of complex craniofacial defects using polyetheretherketone custom-made implants

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1356-1363

  Gerbino, Giovanni ^a   Zavattero, Emanuele ^a   Zenga, Francesco ^a   Bianchi, Francesca Antonella ^a   Garzino Demo, Paolo ^a   Berrone, Sid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cranio facial defects; Custom made implant; Orbital; Peek; Reconstruction

Indexed keywords

POLYETHERETHERKETONE; BIOMATERIAL; KETONE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ALLERGIC REACTION; ARTICLE; BONE IMPLANT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY; CRANIOTOMY; DIPLOPIA; FACE MALFORMATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMANGIOMA; HUMAN; LIQUORRHEA; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MENINGIOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOMA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARANASAL SINUSITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SKULL DEFECT; TREATMENT RESPONSE; BONE IMPLANT INTERFACE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ESTHETICS; MIDDLE AGED; ORBITAL NEOPLASMS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DIPLOPIA; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KETONES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; ORBITAL NEOPLASMS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84941942811     PISSN: 10105182     EISSN: 18784119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.043     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. B.L. Eppley Craniofacial reconstruction with computergenerated HTR patient-matched implants: use in primary bony tumor excision J Craniofac Surg 13 2002 650
2. B.L. Eppley, M. Kilgo, and J.J. Coleman Cranial reconstruction with computer-generated hard-tissue replacement patient-matched implants: indications, surgical technique, and long-term follow-up Plast Reconstr Surg 109 2002 864 871
3. H. Eufinger, M. Wehmöller, E. Machtens, L. Heuser, A. Harders, and D. Kruse Reconstruction of craniofacial bone defects with individual alloplastic implants based on CAD/CAM-manipulated CT-data J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 23 1995 175 181
4. S. Gaillard, P. Pellerin, P. Dhellemmes, B. Pertuzon, J.P. Lejeune, and J.L. Christiaens Strategy of craniofacial reconstruction after resection of spheno-orbital 'en plaque' meningiomas Plast Reconstr Surg 100 1997 1113 1120
5. G. Gerbino, F.A. Bianchi, E. Zavattero, F. Tartara, D. Garbossa, and A. Ducati Single-step resection and reconstruction using patient-specific implants in the treatment of benign cranio-orbital tumors J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71 11 2013
6. M.B. Habal Bone tissue engineering applications in craniofacial reconstruction surgery Clin Plast Surg 31 2004 387 392
7. F. Jalbert, S. Boetto, F. Nadon, F. Lauwers, E. Schmidt, and R. Lopez One-step primary reconstruction for complex craniofacial resection with PEEK custom-made implants J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42 2 2013
8. C.P. Kelly, A.J. Cohen, R. Yavuzer, and I.T. Jackson Cranial bone grafting for orbital reconstruction: is it still the best? J Craniofac Surg 16 2005 181
9. M.M. Kim, K.D.O. Boahene, and P.J. Byrne Use of customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in the reconstruction of complex maxillofacial defects Arch Facial Plast Surg 11 2009 53 57
10. S.M. Kurtz, and J.N. Devine PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants Biomaterials 28 2007 4845 4869
11. B. Lethaus, M.P. Ter Laak, P. Laeven, M. Beerens, D. Koper, J. Poukens, and et al. Treatment algorithm for patients with large skull bone defects and first results J Craniomaxillofac Surg 39 2011 435
12. B. Lethaus, Y. Safi, M. Ter Laak-Poort, A. Kloss-Brandstätter, F. Banki, C. Robbenmenke, and et al. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model J Neurotrauma 29 2012 1077 1083
13. T. Nieminen, I. Kallela, E. Wuolijoki, H. Kainulainen, I. Hiidenheimo, and I. Rantala Amorphous and crystalline polyetheretherketone: mechanical properties and tissue reactions during a 3-year follow-up J Biomed Mater Res A 10 2007 377 383
14. T. Nieminen, I. Kallela, E. Wuolijoki, H. Kainulainen, I. Hiidenheimo, and I. Rantala Amorphous and crystalline polyetheretherketone: mechanical properties and tissue reactions during a 3-year follow-up J Biomed Mater Res A 84A 2008 377 383
15. R.K. Ponnappan, H. Serhan, B. Zarda, R. Patel, T. Albert, and A.R. Vaccaro Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation Spine J 9 2009 263 267
16. J.P. Rubin, and M.J. Yaremchuk Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature Plast Reconstr Surg 100 1997 1336
17. P. Scolozzi, A. Martinez, and B. Jaques Complex orbito-fronto-temporal reconstruction using computer-designed PEEK implant J Craniofac Surg 18 2007 224 228
18. U. Spetzger, V. Vougioukas, and J. Schipper Materials and techniques for osseous skull reconstruction Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19 2010 110