Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 676-682

  Abdul Baki, Heitham ^a   Schoen, Robert E ^a   Dean, Katie ^b   Rose, Sherri ^b   Leffler, Daniel A ^c   Kuganeswaran, Eliathamby ^d   Morris, Michele ^a   Carrell, David ^e   Mehrotra, Ateev ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Central Illinois Endoscopy Center   (United States)

^e CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

ADR adenoma detection rate; CRC colorectal cancer

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOSCOPIST; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE PRACTICE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADENOMA; AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; ILLINOIS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VERY ELDERLY;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLINOIS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84941916295     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.058     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. W.S. Atkin, R. Edwards, I. Kralj-Hans, and et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial Lancet 375 2010 1624 1633
2. R.E. Schoen, P.F. Pinsky, J.L. Weissfeld, and et al. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy N Engl J Med 366 2012 2345 2357
3. N. Segnan, P. Armaroli, L. Bonelli, and et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial-SCORE J Natl Cancer Inst 103 2011 1310 1322
4. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, A.S. Doughty, and et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy N Engl J Med 355 2006 2533 2541
5. M.F. Kaminski, J. Regula, E. Kraszewska, and et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer N Engl J Med 362 2010 1795 1803
6. A. Mehrotra, E.S. Dellon, R.E. Schoen, and et al. Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures Gastrointest Endosc 75 2012 1233 1239.e14
7. D.A. Corley, C.D. Jensen, A.R. Marks, and et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death N Engl J Med 370 2014 1298 1306
8. D.A. Corley, C.D. Jensen, and A.R. Marks Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies Gastrointest Endosc 74 2011 656 665
9. G.C. Harewood, F. Murray, S. Winder, and et al. Evaluation of formal feedback on endoscopic competence among trainees: the EFFECT trial Irish J Med Sci 177 2008 253 256
10. C.J. Kahi, D. Ballard, A.S. Shah, and et al. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 925 931
11. J.H. Hibbard What can we say about the impact of public reporting? Inconsistent execution yields variable results Ann Intern Med 148 2008 160 161
12. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Physician Compare Web Site Overview - Information for Professionals, 2011. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/physician-compare-initiative/Physician-Compare-Overview.html. Accessed July 8, 2015.
13. G.J. Dehmer, J.P. Drozda Jr., R.G. Brindis, and et al. Public reporting of clinical quality data: an update for cardiovascular specialists J Am Coll Cardiol 63 2014 1239 1245
14. GIQuIc. GIQuIC Qualified Clinical Data Measures. Available at: http://giquic.gi.org/docs/2015QCDRWebinar.pdf. Accessed July 8, 2015.
15. National Endoscopic Database. Volume 2014: Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative. Portland, OR: CORI Research Services.
16. D.M. Berwick, B. James, and M.J. Coye Connections between quality measurement and improvement Med Care 41 2003 I30 I38
17. C.H. Fung, Y.W. Lim, S. Mattke, and et al. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care Ann Intern Med 148 2008 111 123
18. H. Harkema, W.W. Chapman, M. Saul, and et al. Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures J Am Med Inform Assoc 18 Suppl 1 2011 i150 i156
19. L.B. Cohen Split dosing of bowel preparations for colonoscopy: an analysis of its efficacy, safety, and tolerability Gastrointest Endosc 72 2010 406 412
20. E. Aoun, H. Abdul-Baki, C. Azar, and et al. A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation Gastrointest Endosc 62 2005 213 218
21. Y. Solad, C. Wang, L. Laine, and et al. Influence of colonoscopy quality measures on patients' colonoscopist selection Am J Gastroenterol 2014
22. D.A. Corley, C.D. Jensen, and A.R. Marks Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies Gastrointest Endosc 74 2011 656 665
23. S.J. Hysong Meta-analysis: audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality Med Care 47 2009 356 363
24. V.M. Kushnir, R.N. Keswani, T.G. Hollander, and et al. Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor: results of a prospective multicenter study Gastrointest Endosc 81 2015 1378 1384
25. H. Brenner, C. Stock, and M. Hoffmeister Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies BMJ 348 2014 g2467
26. R. Nishihara, K. Wu, P. Lochhead, and et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy N Engl J Med 369 2013 1095 1105