Concordance and discordance between taxonomic and functional homogenization: responses of soil mite assemblages to forest conversion

Oecologia

Volumn 179, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 527-535

  Mori, Akira S ^a   Ota, Aino T ^a   Fujii, Saori ^a   Seino, Tatsuyuki ^b   Kabeya, Daisuke ^c   Okamoto, Toru ^c   Ito, Masamichi T ^a,d   Kaneko, Nobuhiro ^a   Hasegawa, Motohiro ^c  

^a YOKOHAMA NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^c FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^d SURUGADAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Community reassembly; Ecosystem functioning; Forest restoration; Oribatid mites; Soil arthropods; Taxonomic and functional homogenization

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPOD; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FUNCTIONAL CHANGE; HOMOGENEITY; LANDSCAPE; MITE; TAXONOMY;

ACARI; ARTHROPODA; LARIX; ORIBATIDA;

SOIL;

ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; CLASSIFICATION; ECOSYSTEM; FOREST; JAPAN; LARIX; MITE; PHYSIOLOGY; SOIL; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; FORESTS; JAPAN; LARIX; MITES; SOIL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84941879122     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3342-2     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Almeida-Neto M, Frensel DMB, Ulrich W (2012) Rethinking the relationship between nestedness and beta diversity: a comment on Baselga (2010). Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:772–777
2. Anderson MJ et al (2010) Navigating the multiple meanings of beta diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28
3. Aoki J (1983) Analysis of oribatid communities by relative abundance in the species and individual numbers of the three major groups (MGP analysis) (in Japanese with an English abstract). Yokohama Natl Univ Environ Res Rep 10:171–176
4. Baiser B, Olden JD, Record S, Lockwood JL, McKinney ML (2012) Pattern and process of biotic homogenization in the New Pangaea. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 279:4772–4777
5. Bardgett RD, van der Putten WH (2014) Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515:505–511
6. Bardgett RD, Wardle D (2010) Aboveground-belowground linkages: biotic interactions, ecosystem processes, and global change. Oxford University Press, Oxford
7. Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143
8. Baselga A (2012) The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from nestedness, and nestedness. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:1223–1232
9. Bokhorst S, Phoenix GK, Bjerke JW, Callaghan TV, Huyer-Brugman F, Berg MP (2012) Extreme winter warming events more negatively impact small rather than large soil fauna: shift in community composition explained by traits not taxa. Glob Change Biol 18:1152–1162
10. Bühler C, Roth T (2011) Spread of common species results in local-scale floristic homogenization in grassland of Switzerland. Divers Distrib 17:1089–1098
11. Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N (2011) Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J Appl Ecol 48:1079–1087
12. Clavel J, Julliard R, Devictor V (2011) Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front Ecol Environ 9:222–228
13. Coleman DC (2008) From peds to paradoxes: linkages between soil biota and their influences on ecological processes. Soil Biol Biochem 40:271–289
14. Cornwell WK, Ackerly DD (2009) Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecol Monogr 79:109–126
15. Díaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:646–655
16. Edwards KF, Litchman E, Klausmeier CA, Elser J (2013) Functional traits explain phytoplankton community structure and seasonal dynamics in a marine ecosystem. Ecol Lett 16: 56–63
17. Farská J, Prejzková K, Rusek J (2014) Management intensity affects traits of soil microarthropod community in montane spruce forest. Appl Soil Ecol 75:71–79
18. Fleishman E, Noss R, Noon B (2006) Utility and limitations of species richness metrics for conservation planning. Ecol Ind 6:543–553
19. Garnier E et al (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85:2630–2637
20. Gagic V et al (2015) Functional identity and diversity of animals predict ecosystem functioning better than species-based indices. Proc Biol Sci 282:2014–2620
21. Gutiérrez-Cánovas C, Millán A, Velasco J, Vaughan IP, Ormerod SJ (2013) Contrasting effects of natural and anthropogenic stressors on beta diversity in river organisms. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:796–805
22. Hansen RA (2000a) Diversity in the decomposing landscape. In: Coleman DC, Hendrix PF (eds) Invertebrates as webmasters in ecosystems. CABI, New York, p 336
23. Hansen RA (2000b) Effects of habitat complexity and composition on a diverse litter microarthropod assemblage. Ecology 81:1120–1132
24. Hasegawa M, Ota AT, Kabeya D, Okamoto T, Saitoh T, Nishiyama Y (2013) The effects of mixed broad-leaved trees on the collembolan community in larch plantations of central Japan. Appl Soil Ecol 83: 125–132
25. Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Harris JA (2009) Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 24:599–605
26. Jaccard P (1912) The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol 11:37–50
27. Kaneko N (1988) Feeding-habits and cheliceral size of oribatid mites in cool temperate forest soils in Japan. Rev Ecol Biol Sol 25:353–363
28. Kaneko N, Salamanca EF (1999) Mixed leaf litter effects on decomposition rates and soil microarthropod communities in an oak-pine stand in Japan. Ecol Res 14:131–138
29. Karp DS, Rominger AJ, Zook J, Ranganathan J, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2012) Intensive agriculture erodes beta-diversity at large scales. Ecol Lett 15:963–970
30. Legendre P (2014) Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1324–1334
31. Leprieur F et al (2011) Partitioning global patterns of freshwater fish beta diversity reveals contrasting signatures of past climate changes. Ecol Lett 14:325–334
32. Lindo Z, Whiteley J, Gonzalez A (2012) Traits explain community disassembly and trophic contraction following experimental environmental change. Glob Change Biol 18:2448–2457
33. Lôbo D, Leão T, Melo FPL, Santos AMM, Tabarelli M (2011) Forest fragmentation drives Atlantic forest of northeastern Brazil to biotic homogenization. Divers Distrib 17:287–296
34. Luxton M (1972) Studies on the oribatid mites of a Danish beech wood soil. I. Nutritional biology. Pedobiologia 12:434–463
35. Makkonen M, Berg MP, van Hal JR, Callaghan TV, Press MC, Aerts R (2011) Traits explain the responses of a sub-arctic Collembola community to climate manipulation. Soil Biol Biochem 43:377–384
36. McCune JL, Vellend M (2013) Gains in native species promote biotic homogenization over four decades in a human-dominated landscape. J Ecol 101:1542–1551
37. McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453
38. Mori AS, Furukawa T, Sasaki T (2013a) Response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change. Biol Rev 88:349–364
39. Mori AS, Shiono T, Koide D, Kitagawa R, Ota AT, Mizumachi E (2013b) Community assembly processes shape an altitudinal gradient of forest biodiversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:878–888
40. Mori AS et al (2015) Biotic homogenization and differentiation of soil faunal communities in the production forest landscape: taxonomic and functional perspectives. Oecologia 177:533–544
41. Nakamura K, Nakamura YN, Fujikawa T (2013) Oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatida) from Tohoku (northeast Japan), collected after a tidal wave in 2011. Acarologia 53:41–76
42. Norkko A, Villnas A, Norkko J, Valanko S, Pilditch C (2013) Size matters: implications of the loss of large individuals for ecosystem function. Sci Rep 3:2646
43. Olden JD, Rooney TP (2006) On defining and quantifying biotic homogenization. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:113–120
44. Olden JD, Leroy Poff N, Douglas MR, Douglas ME, Fausch KD (2004) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol Evol 19:18–24
45. Pasari JR, Levi T, Zavaleta ES, Tilman D (2013) Several scales of biodiversity affect ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:10219–10222
46. Pool TK, Olden JD (2012) Taxonomic and functional homogenization of an endemic desert fish fauna. Divers Distrib 18:366–376
47. Rodrigues JL et al (2013) Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:988–993
48. Seguin A, Harvey E, Archambault P, Nozais C, Gravel D (2014) Body size as a predictor of species loss effect on ecosystem functioning. Sci Rep 4:4616
49. Siepel H, Deruiterdijkman EM (1993) Feeding guilds of oribatid mites based on their carbohydrase activities. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1491–1497
50. Takeda H (1987) Dynamics and maintenance of collembolan community structure in a forest soil system. Res Popul Ecol 29:291–346
51. Tobias N, Monika W (2011) Does taxonomic homogenization imply functional homogenization in temperate forest herb layer communities? Plant Ecol 213:431–443
52. Trentanovi G, von der Lippe M, Sitzia T, Ziechmann U, Kowarik I, Cierjacks A (2013) Biotic homogenization at the community scale: disentangling the roles of urbanization and plant invasion. Divers Distrib 19:738–748
53. Tukey JW (1958) Bias and confidence in not-quite large samples. Ann Math Sci 29:614
54. Turnbull MS, George PBL, Lindo Z (2014) Weighing in: size spectra as a standard tool in soil community analyses. Soil Biol Biochem 68:366–372
55. Valencia E et al (2015) Functional diversity enhances the resistance of ecosystem multifunctionality to aridity in Mediterranean drylands. New Phytol 206:660–671
56. Vellend M et al (2013) Global meta-analysis reveals no net change in local-scale plant biodiversity over time. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:19456–19459
57. Villéger S, Grenouillet G, Brosse S (2013) Decomposing functional β-diversity reveals that low functional β-diversity is driven by low functional turnover in European fish assemblages. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:671–681
58. Wall DH et al (2012) Soil ecology and ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, Oxford
59. Wallwork JA (1976) The distribution and diversity of soil fauna. Academic Press, London
60. Zaitsev AS, Chauvat M, Wolters V (2014) Spruce forest conversion to a mixed beech-coniferous stand modifies oribatid community structure. Appl Soil Ecol 76:60–67
61. Zavaleta E, Pasari J, Moore J, Hernandez D, Suttle KB, Wilmers CC (2009) Ecosystem responses to community disassembly. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1162:311–333