Size matters: Implications of the loss of large individuals for ecosystem function

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Norkko, Alf ^a,b   Villnäs, Anna ^a   Norkko, Joanna ^a   Valanko, Sebastian ^a,b   Pilditch, Conrad ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; BIVALVE; BODY SIZE; ECOSYSTEM; POPULATION DENSITY; SEDIMENT;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; BIVALVIA; BODY SIZE; ECOSYSTEM; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; POPULATION DENSITY;

EID: 84898458444     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep02646     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Hooper, D. U. et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 75, 3-35 (2005).
2. Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59-67 (2012).
3. Naeem, S., Duffy, J. E. & Zavaleta, E. The Functions of Biological Diversity in an Age of Extinction. Science 336, 1401-1406 (2012).
4. Grime, J. P. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 86, 902-910 (1998).
5. Smith,M. D. & Knapp, A. K. Dominant species maintain ecosystemfunction with non-random species loss. Ecol. Lett. 6, 509-517 (2003).
6. Dangles, O. & Malmqvist, B. Species richness-decomposition relationships depend on species dominance. Ecol. Lett. 7, 395-402 (2004).
7. Stachowicz, J. J., Bruno, J. F. & Duffy, J. E. Understanding the effects of marine biodiversity on communities and ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 38, 739-766 (2007).
8. Diaz, S. et al. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20684-20689 (2007).
9. Reiss, J., Bridle, J. R., Montoya, J. M. & Woodward, G. Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 505-514 (2009).
10. Violle, C. et al. The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 244-252 (2012).
11. Albert, C. H. et al. Intraspecific functional variability: extent, structure and sources of variation. J. Ecol. 98, 604-613 (2010).
12. Cianciaruso, M. V., Batalha, M. A., Gaston, K. J. & Petchey, O. L. Including intraspecific variability in functional diversity. Ecology 90, 81-89 (2009).
13. de Bello, F. et al. Quantifying the relevance of intraspecific trait variability for functional diversity. Method. Ecol. Evol. 2, 163-174 (2011).
14. Peters, R. H. The ecological implications of body size. Vol. 2 (CambridgeUniversity Press, 1983).
15. Woodward, G. et al. Individual-based food webs: Species identity, body size and sampling effects. Adv. Ecol. Res. 43, 211-266 (2010).
16. Ellison, A. M. et al. Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3, 479-486 (2005).
17. Volkenborn, N. et al. Intermittent bioirrigation and oxygen dynamics in permeable sediments: An experimental and modeling study of three tellinid bivalves. J. Mar. Res. 70, 794-823 (2012).
18. Emmerson, M. C., Solan,M., Emes, C., Paterson, D.M. & Raffaelli, D. Consistent patterns and the idiosyncratic effects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems. Nature 411, 73-77 (2001).
19. Stachowicz, J. J., Best, R. J., Bracken, M. E. S. & Graham, M. H. Complementarity in marine biodiversity manipulations: Reconciling divergent evidence from field and mesocosm experiments. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18842-18847 (2008).
20. Reiss, J., Bailey, R. A., Perkins, D. M., Pluchinotta, A. & Woodward, G. Testing effects of consumer richness, evenness and body size on ecosystem functioning. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 1145-1154 (2011).
21. Brown, J. H., Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., Savage, V. M. & West, G. B. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85, 1771-1789 (2004).
22. Lohrer, A. M., Thrush, S. F. & Gibbs, M. M. Bioturbators enhance ecosystem function through complex biogeochemical interactions. Nature 431, 1092-1095 (2004).
23. Thrush, S. F., Hewitt, J. E., Gibbs, M., Lundquist, C. & Norkko, A. Functional role of large organisms in intertidal communities: community effects and ecosystem function. Ecosystems 9, 1029-1040 (2006).
24. Dame, R. F. in Bivalve filter feeders and coastal and estuarine ecosystem processes (ed Dame, R. F.) 245-269 (Springer-Verlag, 1993).
25. Norkko, A., Hewitt, J. E., Thrush, S. F. & Funnell, G. A. Benthic-pelagic coupling and suspension-feeding bivalves: Linking site-specific sediment flux and biodeposition to benthic community structure. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 2067-2072 (2001).
26. Sandwell, D. R., Pilditch, C. A. & Lohrer, A. M. Density dependent effects of an infaunal suspension-feeding bivalve (Austrovenus stutchburyi) on sandflat nutrient fluxes and microphytobenthic productivity. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 373, 16-25 (2009).
27. Norkko, A., Hewitt, J. E., Thrush, S. F. & Funnell, G. A. Conditional outcomes of facilitation by a habitat-modifying subtidal bivalve. Ecology 87, 226-234 (2006).
28. Dayton, P. K. in Proceedings of the colloquium on conservation problems in Antarctica (ed Parker, B. C.) 81-95 (Lawrence, KS: Allen Press, 1972).
29. Pearson, T. H. & Rosenberg, R. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 16, 229-311 (1978).
30. Thrush, S. F. & Dayton, P. K. What can ecology contribute to ecosystem-based management? Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2, 419-441 (2010).
31. Solan, M. et al. Extinction and ecosystem function in the marine benthos. Science 306, 1177-1180 (2004).
32. Whitlatch, R. B. et al. Scale-dependent benthic recolonization dynamics: life stagebased dispersal and demographic consequences. Hydrobiologia 375/376, 217-226 (1998).
33. Dayton, P. K. The importance of the natural sciences to conservation. Am. Nat. 162, 1-13 (2003).
34. Säterberg, T., Sellman, S. & Ebenman, B. High frequency of functional extinctions in ecological networks. Nature doi:10.1038/nature12277 (2013).
35. Rodil, I. F., Lohrer, A. M., Chiaroni, L. D.,Hewitt, J. E.& Thrush, S. F. Disturbance of sandflats by thin terrigenous sediment deposits: consequences for primary production and nutrient cycling. Ecol. Appl. 21, 416-426 (2011).
36. Norkko, J., Norkko, A., Thrush, S. F., Valanko, S. & Suurkuukka, H. Conditional responses to increasing scales of disturbance, and potential implications for threshold dynamics in soft-sediment communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 413, 253-266 (2010).
37. Norkko, A. & Bonsdorff, E. Rapid zoobenthic community responses to accumulations of drifting algae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 131, 143-157 (1996).
38. Elmgren, R. & Hill, C. in Marine Biodiversity: Patterns and Processes (eds Ormond, R. F. G., Gage, J. & Angel, M.) 319-336 (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
39. Covich, A. P. et al. The role of biodiversity in the functioning of freshwater and marine benthic ecosystems. Bioscience 54, 767-775 (2004).
40. Norkko, J. et al. A welcome can of worms? Hypoxia mitigation by an invasive species. Global Change Biol. 18, 422-434 (2012).
41. Aller, R. C. & Aller, J. Y. The effect of biogenic irrigation intensity and solute exchange on diagenetic reaction rates in marine sediments. J. Mar. Res. 56, 905-936 (1998).
42. Kristensen, E. Organic matter diagenesis at the oxic/anoxic interface in coastal marine sediments, with emphasis on the role of burrowing animals. Hydrobiologia 426, 1-24 (2000).
43. Villnäs, A., Norkko, A., Norkko, J., Lukkari, K. & Hewitt, J. Impacts of increasing hypoxic disturbance on benthic biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. PLoS ONE 7, e44920 (2012).
44. Hewitt, J., Thrush, S., Gibbs, M., Lohrer, D.&Norkko, A. Indirect effects of Atrina zelandica on water column nitrogen and oxygen fluxes: The role of benthic macrofauna and microphytes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 330, 261-273 (2006).
45. Michaud, E., Desrosiers, G., Mermillod-Blondin, F., Sundby, B. & Stora, G. The functional group approach to bioturbation: II. The effects of the Macoma balthica community on fluxes of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon across the sediment-water interface. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 337, 178-189 (2006).
46. Gilbert, M. A. Growth rate, longevity and maximum size of Macoma balthica (L). Biol. Bull. Woods Hole 145, 119-126 (1973).
47. Strasser, M. Mya arenaria-an ancient invader of the North Sea coast. Helgoland. Meeresun. 52, 309-324 (1999).
48. Valanko, S., Norkko, A. & Norkko, J. Strategies of post-larval dispersal in nontidal soft-sediment communities. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 384, 51-60 (2010).
49. Villnäs, A. et al. The role of recurrent disturbances for ecosystem multifunctionality. Ecology http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/12-1716.1 (2013).
50. Lotze, H. K. et al. Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312, 1806-1809 (2006).
51. Diaz, R. J. & Rosenberg, R. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321, 926-929 (2008).
52. Conley, D. J. et al. Hypoxia-related processes in the Baltic Sea. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 3412-3420 (2009).
53. Thrush, S. F. et al. Forecasting the limits of resilience: integrating empirical research with theory. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 3209-3217 (2009).
54. Hillebrand, H., Bennett, D. M. & Cadotte, M. W. Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. Ecology 89, 1510-1520 (2008).
55. Bengtsson, J. Which species? What kind of diversity? Which ecosystem function? Some problems in studies of relations between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Appl. Soil Ecol. 10, 191-199 (1998).
56. Yvon-Durocher, G. et al. Across ecosystem comparisons of size structure: methods, approaches and prospects. Oikos 120, 550-563 (2011).
57. Villnäs, A. & Norkko, A. Benthic diversity gradients and shifting baselines: implications for assessing environmental status. Ecol. Appl. 21, 2172-2186 (2011).
58. Segerstråle, S. G. Investigations on Baltic populations of the bivalve Macoma baltica (L.) Part 1. Introduction. Studies on recruitment and its relation to depth in Finnish coastal waters during the period 1922-1959. Age and growth. Soc. Sci. Fenn. Comm. Biol. 23, 1-72 (1960).
59. Anderson, M. J., Gorley, R. N. & Clarke, K. R. PERMANOVA1 for PRIMER. Guide to software and statistical methods. 214 pp. (2008).