Effects of population structure on pollen flow, clonality rates and reproductive success in fragmented Serapias lingua populations

BMC Plant Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Pellegrino, Giuseppe ^a   Bellusci, Francesca ^a   Palermo, Anna Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; ITALY; ORCHIDACEAE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION;

ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; ITALY; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; ORCHIDACEAE; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 84941616538     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-015-0600-8     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Newman BJ, Ladd P, Brundrett M, Dixon KW. Effects of habitat fragmentation on plant reproductive success and population viability at the landscape and habitat scale. Biol Conserv. 2013; 159:16-23.
2. Pellegrino G, Bellusci F. The effects of human disturbance on the demography and reproductive success of Serapias cordigera (Orchidaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 2014; 176:408-20.
3. Aguirre A, Dirzo R. Effects of fragmentation on pollinator abundance and fruit set of an abundant understory palm in a Mexican tropical forest. Biol Conserv. 2008; 141:375-84.
4. Öckinger E, Dannestam Å, Smith HG. The importance of fragmentation and habitat quality of urban grasslands for butterfly diversity. Landsc Urban Plan. 2009; 93:31-7.
5. Vranckx G, Jacquemyn H, Mergeay J, Cox K, Janssens P, Gielen BAS, et al. The effect of drought stress on heterozygosity-fitness correlations in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur). Ann Bot-London. 2014; 113:1057-69.
6. Nayak KG, Davidar P. Pollinator limitation and the effect of breeding systems on plant reproduction in forest fragments. Acta Oecol. 2010;36:191-6.
7. Tremblay R, Ackerman JD, Zimmerman JK, Calvo RN. Variation in sexual reproduction in orchids and its evolutionary consequences: a spasmodic journey to diversification. Biol J Linn Soc. 2005; 84:1-54.
8. Busch JW. The evolution of self-compatibility in geographically peripheral populations of Leavenworthia alabamica (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot. 2005; 92:1503-12.
9. Cheptou PO, Avendano V, Lyz G. Pollination processes and the Allee effect in highly fragmented populations: consequences for the mating system in urban environments. New Phytol. 2006; 172:774-83.
10. Gamish A, Fischer GA, Comes HP. Recurrent polymorphic mating type variation in Madagascan Bulbophyllum species (Orchidaceae) exemplifies a high incidence of auto-pollination in tropical orchids. Bot J Linn Soc. 2014; 175:242-58.
11. Zhou X, Lin H, Fan X-L, Gao J-Y. Autonomous self-pollination and insect visitation in a saprophytic orchid, Epipogium roseum (D.Don) Lindl. Aust J Bot. 2012; 60:154-9.
12. Theologidis I, Chelo IM, Goy C, Teotònio H. Reproductive assurance drives transitions to self-fertilization in experimental Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Biol. 2014; 12:93.
13. Peter CI, Johnson SD. Reproductive biology of Acrolophia cochlearis (Orchidaceae): estimating rates of cross-pollination in epidendroid orchids. Ann Bot-London. 2009; 104:573-81.
14. van der Cingel NA. An atlas of orchid pollination: European orchids. London, UK: CRC Press; 2001.
15. Meloni M, Reid A, Caujapé-Castells J, Marrero Á, Fernández-Palacios JM, Mesa-Coelo RA, et al. Effects of clonality on the genetic variability of rare, insular species: the case of Ruta microcarpa from the Canary Islands. Ecol Evol. 2013; 3:1569-79.
16. Tatarenko IV, Vakhrameeva MG. Vegetative propagation in orchids (in Russian). Bulletin Botanicheskogo Sada imeni I.S. Kosenko Kubanskogo Gosagrouniversiteta. 1998; 7:155-8.
17. Gifford E, Foster A. Morphology and Evolution of Vascular Plants. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Co.; 1989.
18. Arditti J. Aspects of the physiology of orchids. Advances in botanical research: Academic Press, London; 1979.
19. Pellegrino G, Musacchio A, Noce ME, Palermo AM, Widmer A. Reproductive versus floral isolation among morphologically similar Serapias L. species (Orchidaceae). J Hered. 2005; 96:15-23.
20. Baumann H, Künkele S. Die Gattung Serapias L. - eine taxonomische übersicht. Mitteilungsblatt Beiträge zur Erhaltung Erforschung heimischer. Orchideen. 1989; 21:701-946.
21. D'Emerico S, Pignone D, Scrugli A. Giemsa C-banded kary-otypes in Serapias L. (Orchidaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 2000; 133:485-92.
22. Barone Lumaga MR, Pellegrino G, Bellusci F, Perrotta E, Perrotta I, Musacchio A. Comparative floral micromorphology in four sympatric species of Serapias (Orchidaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 2012; 169:714-24.
23. Delforge P. Orchids of Europe. North Africa and the Middle East: Timber Press, Portland, Oregon (USA); 2006.
24. Bellusci F, Pellegrino G, Palermo AM, Musacchio A. Phylogenetic relationships in the orchid genus Serapias L. based on non-coding regions of the chloroplast genome. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008; 47:986-91.
25. Vereecken NJ, Dafni A, Cozzolino S. Pollination syndromes in Mediterranean orchids-implication for speciation, taxonomy and conservation. Bot Rev. 2010; 76:220-40.
26. Jersáková J, Johnson SD, Kindlmann P. Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids. Biol Rev. 2006; 81:219-35.
27. Schiestl FP, Cozzolino S. Evolution of sexual mimicry in the Orchidinae: the role of preadaptations in the attraction of male bees as pollinators. BMC Evol Biol. 2008; 8:27.
28. Pellegrino G, Luca A, Bellusci F, Musacchio A. Comparative analysis of floral scents in four sympatric species of Serapias L. (Orchidaceae): clues on their pollination strategies. Plant Syst Evol. 2012; 298:1837-43.
29. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 1987; 19:11-5.
30. Pellegrino G, Cafasso D, Widmer A, Soliva M, Musacchio A, Cozzolino S. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from the orchid Serapias vomeracea (Orchidaceae) and cross-priming to other Serapias species. Mol Ecol Notes. 2001; 1:279-80.
31. Valièr N. GIMLET: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data. Mol Ecol Notes. 2002; 2:377-9.
32. Halkett F, Simon JC, Balloux F. Tackling the population genetics of clonal and partially clonal organisms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005; 20:194-201.
33. Pielou EC. An introduction to mathematical ecology. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1969.
34. Kalinowski ST. Counting alleles with rarefaction: Private alleles and hierarchical sampling designs. Conserv Genet. 2004; 5:539-43.
35. Nei M. Mutation-Driven Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
36. Goudet J. FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-Statistics. J Hered. 1995; 86:485-6.
37. Rousset F. Inferences from spatial population genetics. In: Balding DJ, Bishop M, Cannings C, editors. Handbook of statistical genetics. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley; 2007. p. 945-79.
38. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-Statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 1984; 38:1358-70.
39. Cornuet JM, Luikart G. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics. 1997; 144:2001-14.
40. Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM. BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered. 1999; 90:502-3.
41. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 1998; 7:639-55.
42. Luikart G, Sherwin WB, Steele BM, Allendorf FW. Usefulness of molecular markers for detecting population bottlenecks via monitoring genetic change. Mol Ecol. 1998; 7:963-74.
43. Pellegrino G, Palermo AM, Noce ME, Bellusci F, Musacchio A. Genetic population structure in the Mediterranean Serapias vomeracea, a nonrewarding orchid group. Interplay of pollination strategy and stochastic forces? Plant Syst Evol. 2007; 263:145-57.
44. Hedrén M, Nordström S, Ståhlberg D. Geographical variation and systematics of the tetraploid marsh orchid Dactylorhiza majalis subsp. sphagnicola (Orchidaceae) and closely related taxa. Bot J Linn Soc. 2012; 168:174-93.
45. Gustafsson S, Lönn M. Genetic differentiation and habitat preference of flowering-time variants within Gymnadenia conopsea. Heredity. 2003; 91:284-92.
46. Stark C, Michalski SG, Babik W, Winterfeld G, Durka W. Strong genetic differentiation between Gymnadenia conopsea and G. densiflora despite morphological similarity. Plant Syst Evol. 2011; 293:213-26.
47. Soliva M, Widmer A. Gene flow across species boundaries in sympatric, sexually deceptive Ophrys (Orchidaceae) species. Evolution. 2003; 57:2252-61.
48. Mant J, Peakall R, Schiestl FP. Does selection on floral odor promote differentiation among populations and species of the sexually deceptive orchid genus Ophrys? Evolution. 2005; 59:1449-63.
49. Swarts ND, Sinclair EA, Krauss SL, Dixon KW. Genetic diversity in fragmented populations of the critically endangered spider orchid Caladenia huegelii: implications for conservation. Conserv Genet. 2009; 10:1199-208.
50. Chen YY, Bao Z-X, Qu Y, Li W, Li Z-Z. Genetic diversity and population structure of the medicinal orchid Gastrodia elata revealed by microsatellite analysis. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2014;54:182-9.
51. Abeli T, Gentili R, Mondoni A, Orsenigo S, Rossi G. Effects of marginality on plant population performance. J Biogeogr. 2014; 41:239-49.
52. Leimu R, Mutikainen P, Koricheva J, Fischer M. How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J Ecol. 2006; 94:942-52.
53. Palstra FP, Ruzzante DE. Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: what can they tell us about the importance of genetic stochasticity for wild population persistence? Mol Ecol. 2008; 17:3428-47.
54. Davies SJ, Cavers S, Finegan B, White A, Breed MF, Lowe AJ. Pollen flow in fragmented landscapes maintains genetic diversity following stand-replacing disturbance in a neotropical pioneer tree, Vochysia ferruginea Mart. Heredity. 2013; 1-5.
55. Lind H, Franzén M, Pettersson B, Nilsson LA. Metapopulation pollination in the deceptive orchid Anacamptis pyramidalis. Nord J Bot. 2007; 25:176-82.
56. Mustajärvi K, Siikamäki P, Rytkönen S, Lammi A. Consequences of plant population size and density for plant-pollinator interactions and plant performance. J Ecol. 2001; 89:80-7.
57. Setsuko S, Nagamitsu T, Tomaru N. Pollen flow and effects of population structure on selfing rates and female and male reproductive success in fragmented Magnolia stellata populations. BMC Biol. 2013; 13:10.
58. Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen MA. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9:968-80.
59. Vandewoestijne S, Róis AS, Caperta A, Baguette M, Tyteca D. Effects of individual and population parameters on reproductive success in three sexually deceptive orchid species. Plant Biol. 2009; 11:454-63.
60. Schiestl FP. Floral evolution and pollinator mate choice in a sexually deceptive orchid. J Evol Biol. 2004; 17:255-64.
61. Wong BBM, Salzmann C, Schiestl FP. Pollinator attractiveness increases with distance from flowering orchids. Proc R Soc Lond. 2004; 271:S212-4.
62. Brzosko E, Wroblewska A, Ratkiewicz M. Spatial genetic structure and clonal diversity of island populations of lady's slipper (Cypripedium calceolus) from the Biebrza National Park (northeast Poland). Mol Ecol. 2002; 11:2499-509.
63. Brzosko E, Talalaj I, Wroblewska A. Genetic structure of rare Epipactis atrorubens populations from two national parks in Northeast Poland. Pol Bot St. 2006; 22:71-80.
64. Brzosko E, Wroblewska A. Genetic variation and clonal diversity in island Cephalanthera rubra populations from the Biebrza National Park. Poland Bot J Linn Soc. 2003; 143:99-108.
65. Silvertown JW. The evolutionary maintenance of sexual reproduction: evidence from the ecological distribution of asexual reproduction in clonal plants. Int J Plant Sci. 2008; 169:157-68.
66. Vallejo-Marín M, Dorken ME, Barrett SCH. The ecological and evolutionary consequences of clonality for plants mating. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 2010; 41:193-213.
67. Lhuillier E, Butaud JF, Bouvet JM. Extensive clonality and strong differentiation in the insular Pacific tree Santalum insulare: implications for its conservation. Ann Bot. 2006; 98:1061-72.