Alternative methods of sensory testing: Advantages and disadvantages

Rapid Sensory Profiling Techniques and Related Methods: Applications in New Product Development and Consumer Research

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 27-51

  Stone, H ^a  

^a Sensory Consulting Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Data analysis; Descriptive analysis; QDA; Qualifying subjects; Subject skill; Test time

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION;

DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS; PRODUCT INFORMATION; QUALIFYING SUBJECTS; QUALITY OF RESULTS; QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS (QDA); SENSORY INFORMATION; SUBJECT SKILL; TEST TIME;

SENSORY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84941559546     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1533/9781782422587.1.27     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Bradley R.A., Harmon T.J. The modified triangle test. Biometrics 1964, 20:608-625.
2. Brandt M.A., Skinner E., Coleman J. Texture profile method. J. Food Sci. 1963, 28:404-410.
3. Cardello A., Lawless H.T., Schutz H. Effects of extreme anchors and interior label spacing on labeled magnitude scales. Food Qual. Prefer. 2008, 21:232-334.
4. Cairncross W.E., Sjöström L.B. Flavor profile - a new approach to flavor problems. Food Technol. 1950, 4:308-311.
5. Dairou V., Sieffermann J.M. A comparison of 14 jams characterized by conventional profile and a quick original method, the flash profile. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67:826-834.
6. Delarue J., Sieffermann J.M. Sensory mapping using flash profile. Comparison with a conventional descriptive method for the evaluation of the flavor of fruit dairy products. Food Qual. Prefer. 2004, 15:383-392.
7. Ennis D.M., Bi J. The beta-binomial model: accounting for inter-trial variation in replicated difference and preference tests. J. Sensory Stud. 1998, 13:389-412.
8. Ennis J.M., Jesionka V. The power of sensory discrimination methods revisited. J. Sensory Stud. 2011, 26(5):371-382.
9. Giradot N.E., Peryam D.R., Shapiro R. Selection of sensory testing panels. Food Technol. 1952, 6:140-143.
10. Gridgeman N.T. Pair comparisons, with and without ties. Biometrics 1959, 15:382-388.
11. Groopman J. December 17. New York Review Books 2009, 56(20):22. 24.
12. Huitson A. Problems with Procrustes analysis. J. Appl. Stat. 1989, 16:39-45.
13. Kuesten C.L., Kruse L. Physical Requirements for Guidelines for Sensory Evaluation Laboratories 2008, MNL60. ASTM International, West Conshohoken, PA. 2nd edn.
14. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory Evaluation of Food Principles and Practices 2010, Springer, New York.
15. Mackey A.O., Jones P. Selection of members of a food tasting panel: discernment of primary tastes in water solution compared with judging ability for foods. Food Technol 1954, 8:527-530.
16. Meilgaard M., Civille G.V., Carr B.T. Sensory Evaluation Techniques 2006, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 4th edn.
17. Pangborn R.M. Individuality in responses to sensory stimuli. Criteria of Food Acceptance. How Man Chooses What He Eats 1981, Forster Verlag, Zurich. J. Solms, R.L. Hall (Eds.).
18. Peryam D.R., Pilgrim F.J. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technol. 1957, 11(9):9-14.
19. Pfaffman C., Schlosberg H., Cornsweet J. Variables affecting difference tests. Food Acceptance Testing Methodology 1954, 4-17. National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, Washington, DC. D.R. Peryam, F.J. Pilgrim, M.S. Peterson (Eds.).
20. Sawyer F.M., Stone H., Abplanalp H., Stewart G.F. Repeatability estimates in sensory-panel selection. J. Food Sci. 1962, 27:386-393.
21. Schlosberg H., Pfaffmann C., Cornsweet J., Pierrel R. Selection and training of panels. Food Acceptance Testing Methodology 1954, 45-54. National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, Washington, DC. D.R. Peryam, J.J. Pilgrim, M.S. Peterson (Eds.).
22. Schutz H.G., Cardello A.V. A labeled affective magnitude (LAM) scale for assessing food liking/disliking. J. Sensory Stud. 2001, 16:117-159.
23. Stone H., Bleibaum R.N., Thomas H.A. Sensory Evaluation Practices 2012, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 4th edn.
24. Stone H., Sidel J.L. Quantitative descriptive analysis: developments, applications, and the future. Food Technol. 1998, 52(8):48-52.
25. Stone H., Sidel J.L. Sensory research and consumer-led food product development. Consumer-Led Food Product Development 2007, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK. H. MacFie (Ed.).
26. Stone H., Sidel J.L. Sensory science and consumer behavior. Global Issues in Food Science and Technology 2009, 67-77. Elsevier, New York. G. Barbosa-Canovas, A. Mortimer, D. Lineback, W. Spiess, K. Buckle, P. Colonna (Eds.).
27. Stone H., Sidel J.L., Oliver S., Woolsey A., Singleton R.C. Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Technol. 1974, 28(11). 24, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34.
28. Williams A.A., Arnold G. A comparison of the aromas of six coffees characterized by conventional profiling, free-choice profiling and similarity scaling methods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1985, 36:204-214.
29. Williams A.A., Langron S.P. The use of free-choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1984, 35:558-568.