Reconciliation of decision-making heuristics based on decision trees topologies and incomplete fuzzy probabilities sets

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Doubravsky, Karel ^a   Dohnal, Mirko ^a  

^a BRNO UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION TREE; FUZZY SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FUZZY LOGIC; HEURISTICS; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DECISION TREES; FUZZY LOGIC; HEURISTICS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROBABILITY;

EID: 84941309553     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131590     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Dondi R, El-Mabrouk N, Swenson K. Gene tree correction for reconciliation and species tree inference: Complexity and algorithms. J Discrete Algorithms. 2013;25:51-65 doi: 10.1016/j.jda.2013.06.001
2. Vats S, Vats G, Vaish R, Kumar V. Selection of optimal electronic toll collection system for India: A subjective-fuzzy decision making approach. Appl Soft Comput. 2014;21:444-452. doi: 10.1016/j. asoc.2014.04.006
3. Daniel K, Hirshleifer D, Teoh S. Investor Psychology in Capital Markets: Evidence and Policy Implications. J Monet Econ. 2011;48:139-209. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932 (01) 00091-5
4. Hodouin D. Methods for automatic control, observation, and optimization in mineral processing plants. J Process Control. 2011;21:211-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.10.016
5. Maroney J, McGarry C, Óh Ógartaigh C. Familiarity, home bias and investors' reactions to 20-F reconciliation gains and losses and perceptions of the quality of accounting principles. Br Account Rev. 2008;40:103-122. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2008.01.001
6. Vasebi A, Poulin É, Hodouin D. Dynamic data reconciliation in mineral and metallurgical plants. Annu Rev Control. 2012;36:235-243. doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2012.09.005
7. Stiglic G, Kocbek S, Pernek I, Kokol P. Comprehensive decision tree models in bioinformatics. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: s.e33812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033812
8. Thipwiwatpotjana P, Lodwick W. Pessimistic, optimistic, and minimax regret approaches for linear programs under uncertainty. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak. 2014;13:151-171. doi: 10.1007/s10700-013-9171-z
9. Yuan WJ, Xia CY. Role of Investment Heterogeneity in the Cooperation on Spatial Public Goods Game. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091012 PMID: 24632779
10. Kuzilek J, Kremen V, Soucek F, Lhotska L. Independent Component Analysis and Decision Trees for ECG Holter Recording De-Noising. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e98450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098450 PMID: 24905359
11. Qin G, Luo L, Lv L, Xiao Y, Tu J, Tao L, et al. Decision tree analysis of traditional risk factors of carotid atherosclerosis and a cutpoint-based prevention strategy. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e111769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111769 PMID: 25398126
12. Dubois D. On various ways of tackling incomplete information in statistics. Int J Approx Reason. 2014;55:1570-1574.
13. Fargier H, Amor N, Guezguez W. On the Complexity of Decision Making in Possibilistic Decision Trees; 2012. Available: arXiv:1202.3718. Accessed 17 January 2015.
14. Dubois D, Fargier H, Guyonnet D. Data Reconciliation under Fuzzy Constraints in Material Flow Analysis. Proceedings of the 8th conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology. Atlantis Press, 2013.
15. Lee Y, Li M, Yen T, Huang T. Analysis of fuzzy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory on technology acceptance model. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38:14407-14416. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011. 04.088
16. Pedrycz W, Al-Hmouz R, Morfeq A, Balamash A. Building granular fuzzy decision support systems. Knowl Based Syst. 2014;58:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.07.022
17. Zeinalkhani M, Eftekhari M. Fuzzy partitioning of continuous attributes through discretization methods to construct fuzzy decision tree classifiers. Info Sci. 2014;278:715-735. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.03. 087
18. Jegadeesh N, Kim J, Krische S, Lee C. Analyzing the analysts: When do recommendations add value?. J Finance. 2004;59:1083-1124. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00657.x
19. Bradshaw M. How Do Analysts Use Their Earnings Forecasts in Generating Stock Recommendations?. SSRN Working Paper Series. 2004. doi: 10.2139/ssrn. 256438
20. Xia CY, Wang L, Sun S, Wang J. An SIR model with infection delay and propagation vector in complex networks. Nonlinear Dynamics. 2012;69:927-934. doi: 10.1007/s11071-011-0313-y
21. Xia CY, Sun SW, Liu ZX, Chen ZQ, Yuan ZZ. Epidemics of sirs model with nonuniform transmission on scale-free networks. Int J Mod Phys B. 2009;23:2203-2213. doi: 10.1142/S021797920905211X
22. Dehmer M, Kraus V. On extremal properties of graph entropies. Match-Commun Math Cmput Chem. 2012;68:889-912.
23. Dehmer M, Grabner M. The Discrimination Power of Molecular Identification Numbers Revisited. Match-Commun Math Cmput Chem. 2013;69:785-794.
24. Kraus V, Dehmer M, Schutte M. On Sphere-Regular Graphs and the Extremality of Information-Theoretic Network Measures. Match-Commun Math Cmput Chem. 2013;70:885-900.
25. Kyburg H. Jr. Bayesian and non-bayesian evidential updating. Artif Intell. 1987;31:271-293.
26. Kim M, Cheeti A, Yoo C, Choo M, Paick J, Oh S. Non-invasive clinical parameters for the prediction of urodynamic bladder outlet obstruction: analysis using causal bayesian networks. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e113131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113131 PMID: 25397903
27. Wang P. The limitation of Bayesianism. Artif Intel. 2004;158:97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2003.09.003
28. Sais F, Thomopoulos R. Ontology-aware prediction from rules: A reconciliation-based approach. Knowl Based Syst. 2014;67:117-130. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.023
29. Jung J. Computational reputation model based on selecting consensus choices: An empirical study on semantic wiki platform. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39:9002-9007. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.035
30. Schallehn E, Sattler K, Saake G. Efficient similarity-based operations for data integration. Data Knowl Eng. 2004;48:361-387. doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2003.08.004
31. Kashkoush M, El Maraghy H. Matching Bills of Materials Using Tree Reconciliation. Procedia CIRP. 2013;7:169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.029
32. Alhaj-Dibo M, Maquin D, Ragot J. Data reconciliation: A robust approach using a contaminated distribution. Control Eng Pract. 2008;16:159-170. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2007.01.003
33. Mousavi S, Gigerenzer G. Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics. J Bus Res. 2014;67:1671-1678. doi: 10. 1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.013
34. Sundar S, Singh A. New heuristic approaches for the dominating tree problem. Appl Soft Comput. 2013;13:4695-4703. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2013.07.014
35. Dohnal M, Vykydal J, Kvapilik M, Bures P. Practical uncertainty assessment of reasoning paths (fault trees) under total uncertainty ignorance. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 1992;5:125-131. doi: 10.1016/0950-4230 (92) 80009-W
36. Fitch EC, Hong I. Hydraulic component design and selection. Stillwater: BarDyne; 2004.
37. Dimitri P B, Tsitsiklis J N. Introduction to Probability. Belmont, Mass.: Athena Scientific; 2008.
38. Rokach L, Maimon O. Data Mining with Decision Trees: Theory and Applications. Singapore: World Scientific; 2008.
39. Rutkowski L, Jaworski M, Pietruczuk L, Duda P. The CART decision tree for mining data streams. Information Sciences. 2014;266:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.12.060
40. Parsons S, Dohnal M. The qualitative and semiqualitative analysis of environmental problems. Environ Softw. 1995;10:75-85. doi: 10.1016/0266-9838 (95) 00008-9
41. Janssens D, Wets G, Brijs T, Vanhoof K, Arentze T, Timmermans H. Integrating Bayesian networks and decision trees in a sequential rule-based transportation model. Eur J Oper Res. 2006;175:16-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.022
42. Vandaele N, Landrieux B, Vandaele C, Landrieux C, Decouttere C. The sustainable reconciliation between technological, financial and people aspects in R&D portfolio assessment. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT 2012. doi: 10. 1109/ICMIT.2012.6225779
43. Narasimhan S, Jordache C. Data Reconciliation and Gross Error Detection: An Intelligent Use of Process Data. 1st ed. Houston: Gulf Professional Publishing; 1999.
44. Monekosso D, Remagnino P. Data reconciliation in a smart home sensor network. Expert Syst Appl. 2013;40:3248-3255. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.037
45. Zhang Z, Shao Z, Chen X, Wang K, Qian J. Quasi-weighted least squares estimator for data reconciliation. Comput Chem Eng. 2010;34:154-162. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.09.007
46. Ubando A, Culaba A, Aviso K, Ng D, Tan R. Fuzzy mixed-integer linear programming model for optimizing a multi-functional bioenergy system with biochar production for negative carbon emissions. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2014;16:1537-1549. doi: 10.1007/s10098-014-0721-z
47. Tan R, Briones L, Culaba A. Fuzzy data reconciliation in reacting and non-reacting process data for life cycle inventory analysis. J Clean Prod. 2007;15:944-949. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.09.001
48. Tanaka H, Asai K. Fuzzy linear programming problems with fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1984;13:1-10. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114 (84) 90022-8
49. Watson S. The meaning of probability in probabilistic safety analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 1994;45:261-269. doi: 10.1016/0951-8320 (94) 90142-2
50. Fedrizzi M, Kacprzyk J, Verdegay JL. A survey of fuzzy optimization and mathematical programming. In: Fedrizzi M, Kacprzyk J, Roubens M, editors. Interactive Fuzzy Optimization. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Berlin: Springer; 1991. pp. 15-28.
51. Lai YJ, Hwang CI. Fuzzy mathematical programming: Methods and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1992.
52. Guua S, Wu Y. Two-phase approach for solving the fuzzy linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1999;107:191-195. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114 (97) 00304-7
53. Huang G, Moore RD. Grey linear programming, its solving approach, and its application. Int J Syst Sci. 1993;24:159-172. doi: 10.1080/00207729308949477
54. Brooke A, Kendrick D, Meeraus A. GAMS: User's Guide. Redwood City, California: The Scientific Press; 1988.
55. Kikuchi S. A method to defuzzify the fuzzy number: Transportation problem application. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2000;116:3-9. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114 (99) 00033-0
56. Nie G, Zhang L, Liu Y, Zheng X, Shi Y. Decision analysis of data mining project based on Bayesian risk. Expert Syst Appl. 2009;36:4589-4594. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.014
57. Rose LM. Engineering investment decisions: planning under uncertainty. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1976.
58. Eaton JW, Bateman D, Hauberg S. Gnu Octave Version 3. 0. 1 Manual: A High-Level Interactive Language for Numerical Computations. 1st ed. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform; 2009.
59. Basgalupp MP, Barros RC, De Carvalho A, Freitas AA. Evolving decision trees with beam searchbased initialization and lexicographic multi-objective evaluation. Inf Sci. 2014;258:160-181. doi: 10. 1016/j.ins.2013.07.025
60. Cao S, Dehmer M, Shi Y. Extremality of degree-based graph entropies. Inf Sci. 2014;278:22-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.03.133