The influence of physiography on historical and future land development changes: A case study of central Arkansas (USA), 1857-2030

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 143, Issue , 2015, Pages 76-89

  Jawarneh, Rana N ^a   Julian, Jason P ^b   Lookingbill, Todd R ^c  

^a YARMOUK UNIVERSITY   (Jordan)

^b TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND   (United States)

Author keywords

Agriculture development; Ecoregion assessment; Human environment interactions; Land cover change; SLEUTH; Urban growth modeling

Indexed keywords

GEOMORPHOLOGY;

AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT; ECOREGIONS; HUMAN-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; LAND-COVER CHANGE; SLEUTH; URBAN GROWTH MODELING;

URBAN GROWTH;

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT; ECOREGION; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FUTURE PROSPECT; GROWTH MODELING; HISTORICAL RECORD; LAND COVER; LAND MANAGEMENT; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; VEGETATION DYNAMICS;

ARKANSAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84941305349     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Adams W. North Little Rock. The Unique City 1986, August House, Little Rock.
2. Aretano R., Petrosillo I., Zaccarelli N., Semeraro T., Zurlini G. People perception of landscape change effects on ecosystem services in small Mediterranean islands: A combination of subjective and objective assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 112:63-73.
3. Bakker M., Veldkamp A. Changing relationships between land use and environmental characteristics and their consequences for spatially explicit land-use change prediction. Journal of Land Use Science 2012, 7(4):407-424.
4. Barau A.S., Ludin A.N. Intersection of landscape, anthropocene and fourth paradigm. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 2012, 6. Available at http://landscaperesearch.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrlr-2012-1/download/lrlr-2012-1Color.pdf (accessed 25.05.15).
5. Batty M., Longley P., Fotheringham S. Urban growth and form: Scaling, fractal geometry, and diffusion-limited aggregation. Environment and Planning A 1989, 21(11):1447-1472.
6. Bearden R. Jefferson county's worst disaster: The flood of 1927. Arkansas Historical Quarterly 1984, 43(4):324-338.
7. Brister L. The image of Arkansas in the early German emigrant guidebook: Notes on immigration. Arkansas Historical Quarterly 1977, 36(4):338-345.
8. Cadwell N. Arkansas and its early inhabitants. Arkansas Historical Quarterly 1942, 1(1):41-52.
9. CBI (The Conservation Biology Institute) PAD-US 1.1 (CBI edition) 2010, Oregon, Corvallis. http://consbio.org/products/projects/pad-us-cbi-edition.
10. Chen J., Gong P., He C., Luo W., Tamura M., Shi P. Assessment of the urban development plan of Beijing by a CA-based urban growth model. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 2002, 68(10):1063-1071.
11. Clarke K.C., Hoppen S., Gaydos L. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco bay area. Environmental and Planning B: Planning and Design 1997, 24(2):247-261.
12. Clarke C., McLafferty S., Tempalski B. On epidemiology and geographic information systems: A review and discussion of future directions. Emerging Infectious Diseases 1996, 2(2):85-92.
13. Cowardin L.M., Carter V., Golet F.C., LaRoe E.T. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States 1979, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service/Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Washington, DC/Jamestown, ND.
14. Dahl T. Wetlands losses in the United States 1780's to 1980's 1990, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Documents/Wetlands-Losses-in-the-United-States-1780s-to-1980s.pdf.
15. Dietzel C., Clarke K. Toward optimal calibration of the SLEUTH land use change model. Transactions in GIS 2007, 11(1):29-45.
16. Dimitri C., Effland A., Conklin N. The 20th century transformation of U.S. agriculture and farm policy. Economic information bulletin No. (EIB-3) 2005, Economic Research Services/USDA. http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/259572/eib3_1_.pdf.
17. ESRI ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10 2011, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.
18. Foley J.A., DeFries R., Asner G., Baford C., Bonan G., Cerpenter S., et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 2005, 309(570):570-574.
19. Fragkias M., Günerlap B., Seto K., Goodness J. A synthesis of global urbanization projections. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities 2013, 409-437. Springer, Dordrecht. T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Günerlap, P.J. Marcotullio, R.I. McDonald, S. Parnell, M. Schewenius, M. Sendstad, K.C. Seto, C. Wilkinson (Eds.).
20. Fry J., Xian G., Jin S., Dewitz J., Homer C., Yang L., et al. Completion of the 2006 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 2011, 77(9):858-864.
21. Gallant A., Loveland T.R., Sohl T.L., Napton D.E. Using an ecoregion framework to analyze land-cover and land-use dynamics. Environmental Management 2004, 34:S89-S110.
22. Gallant A.L., Whittier T.R., Larsen D.P., Omernik J.M., Hughes R.M. Regionalization as a tool for managing environmental resources. EPA/600/3-89/060 1989, 152. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR.
23. Gates P. The role of the land speculator in western development. Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 1942, 66(3):314-333.
24. Gentry H. The story of Arkansas prior to its statehood. Arkansas Historical Quarterly 1954, 13(3):317-320.
25. Gesch D.B., Oimoen M., Greenlee S., Nelson C., Steuck M., Tyler D. The national elevation dataset. Photogrametric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2002, 68(1):5-11.
26. Goldewijk K., Verburg P. Uncertainities in global-scale reconstructions of historical land use: An illustration using the HYDE data set. Landscape Ecology 2013, 28(5):861-877.
27. Griffith J., Stephen S., Loveland T. Landscape trends in mid-Atlantic and southeastern United States ecoregions. Environmental Management 2003, 32(5):572-588.
28. Grimm N., Faeth S., Golubiewski N., Redman C., Bai X., Briggs J. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 2008, 319(756):756-760.
29. Gustafson E.J., Parker G.R. Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landscape Ecology 1992, 7(2):101-110.
30. Hanson G.T., Moneyhon C.H. Historical atlas of Arkansas 1989, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
31. Harper C.A., McBrien D.D. The story of Arkansas 1931, The Grolier Society, Kansas City.
32. Harrison R., Kollmorgen W.M. Land reclamation in Arkansas under the swamp land grant of 1850. Arkansas Historical Quarterly 1947, 6(4):369-418.
33. Herndon D. Why Little Rock was born 1933, Central Printing Company, Little Rock.
34. Herold M., Goldstein N.C., Clarke K.C. The spatio-temporal form of urban growth: Measurment, analysis, and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment 2003, 86(3):286-302.
35. Jantz C., Goetz S., Donato D., Claggett P. Designing and implementing a regional urban modeling system using the SLEUTH cellular urban model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2010, 34(1):1-16. 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.08.003.
36. Jantz C., Goetz S., Shelley M. Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Balitmore-Washington metropolitan area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2003, 30:251-271.
37. Jawarneh R., Julian J. Development of an accurate fine-resolution land cover timeline: Little Rock, Arkansas, USA (1857-2006). Applied Geography 2012, 35:104-113.
38. Julian J.P., Thomas R., Moursi S., Hoagland B.W., Tarhule A. Historical variability and feedbacks among land cover, stream power, and channel geometery along the lower Canadian River floodplain in Oklahoma. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2012, 37(4):449-458.
39. Lewis A. Along the Arkansas 1932, The Southwest Press, Dallas.
40. Loveland T., Mahmood A design for a sustained assessment of climate forcing and feedbacks related to land use land cover change. Bulletin of the American Metrological Society 2014, 95:1563-1572.
41. Lovell S., Johnston D. Designing landscape for performance based on emerging principles in landscape ecology. Ecology and Society 2009, 14(1.). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art44/.
42. Lyon O. The Quapaws and Little Rock. Arkansas Historical Quarterly 1949, 8(4):336-342.
43. Mahiny A.S., Clarke K.C. Guiding SLEUTH land-use/land-cover change modeling using multicriteria evaluation: Towards dynamic sustainable land-use planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2012, 39(5):925-944.
44. McGarigal K.S., Cushman S.A., Neel M.C., Ene E. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical map 2002, Retrieved from http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
45. Nutt T. Floods, flatcars, and floozies: Creating the city of north Little Rock, Arkansas. Pulaski County Historical Review 1993, 41(2):26-38.
46. Oguz H., Klein A.G., Srinivasan R. Using SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria CMSA. Research Journal of Social Sciences 2007, 2:72-82.
47. Omernik J., Griffith G. Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain (EPA) 2012, Retrieved from http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/152241.
48. Omernik J. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1987, 77(1):118-125.
49. Pearcy M. After the flood: A history of the 1928 Flood Control Act. Journal of Illinois State Historical Society 2002, 95(2):172-201.
50. Pijanowski B., Robinson K. Rates and patterns of land use change in the upper Great Lakes States, USA: A framework for spatial temporal analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 102(2):106-116.
51. Rafiee R., Mahiny A.S., Khorasani N., Darvishsefat A. Simulating urban growth in Mashad City, Iran through the SLEUTH model (UGM). Cities 2009, 26(1):19-26.
52. Ramsey R.D., Falconer A., Jensen J.R. The relationship between NOAA-AVHRR NDVI and ecoregions in Utah. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 1995, 53(3):188-198.
53. Reker R.R., Sayler K.L., Friesz A.M., Sohl T.L., Bouchard M.A., Sleeter B.M., et al. Mapping and modeling of land use and land cover in the eastern United States from 1992 through 2050. Baseline and projected future carbon storage and greenhouse gas fluxes in ecosystems of the eastern United States 2014, U.S. Geological Survey Professional, Paper 1804 (pp.27-54) http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1804/pdf/pp1804_chapter3.pdf. Z. Zhiliang, B.C. Reed (Eds.).
54. Richards I.D. Story of a Rivertown: Little Rock in the ninteenth century. Benton 1969.
55. Smith K. The story of cutting the last great virgin forest east of the rockies 1986, University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville.
56. Suarez-Rubio, Lookingbill, Wainger Modeling exurban development near Washington, DC, USA: Comparison of a pattern-based model and a spatially-explicit econometric model. Landscape Ecology 2012, 27(7):1045-1061.
57. TNC (The Nature Conservancy) Ouachita Mountains assessment (p. 231). Ouachita Ecoregional Assessment Team 2003, The Nature Conservancy Arkansas Field Office, Little Rock, AR. https://www.conservationgateway.org/ConservationPlanning/SettingPriorities/EcoregionalReports/Documents/OuachitaMts_ERA_Report_Dec2003.pdf.
58. U.S.Census Bureau TIGER/line shapefiles 2012, Available at http://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/tiger.html.
59. U.S.Census Bureau Census of agriculture: 1974. Part 4. Arkansas, statistics by county 2007, Vol. 1. GPO, Washington, DC.
60. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory website 1980, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/.
61. USGS National Hydrography Dataset - based on 1:24,000 scale USGS topographic map content. 2011, Retrieved from http://nhd.usgs.gov/.
62. Verburg P., Schot P., Dijst M., Veldkamp A. Land use change modelling: Current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal 2004, 61(4):309-324.
63. Verburg P., Soepboer W., Veldkamp A.A., Limpiada R., Espaldon V., Mastura S. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: The CLUE-S model. Environmental Management 2002, 30(3):391-405.
64. Walker R., Solecki W. Theorizing land-cover and land-use change: The case of the Florida everglades and its degradation. Annals of the Association of American Geogrphers 2004, 94(2):311-328.
65. Wang Q., Malanson G.P. Patterns of correlation among landscape metrics. Physical Geography 2007, 28(2):170-182.
66. Watkins B. Efforts to encourage immigration to Arkansas, 1865-1874. Arkansas Historical Quarterly 1979, 38(1):32-62.
67. Wenger S., Fowler L. Protecting stream and river corridors: Creating effective local riparian buffer ordinances 2000, Public Policy Research Series, University of Georgia, Athens, GA. http://www.rivercenter.uga.edu/publications/pdf/riparian_buffer_guidebook.pdf.
68. White R., Engelen G. Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modelling. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1997, 24(2):235-246.
69. Woods A.J., Foti T.L., Chapman S.S., Omernik J.M., Wise J.A., Murray E.O., et al. Ecoregions of Arkansas (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs) 2004, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, (map scale 1:1,000,000) ftp://ftp.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/ar/ar_front.pdf.
70. Yang X., Lo C.P. Modeling urban growth and landscape change in the Atlanta metropolitan area. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2003, 17(5):463-488.