Role of contextualizing a crisis scenario on the performance of a cricothyrotomy procedural task;Le rôle de la mise en contexte d’un scénario de crise sur la performance d’une tâche procédurale de cricothyrotomie

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 62, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1104-1113

  You Ten, Kong E ^a   Wong, Catherine ^a   Arzola, Cristian ^a   Cheung, Jessica ^a   Friedman, Zeev ^a   Perelman, Sev ^a   Siddiqui, Naveed ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTEXTUALIZATION OF A CRISIS SCENARIO; CONTEXTUALIZED SCENARIO; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE FAILURE; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSISTANT; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENT; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRACHEOSTOMY KIT; TRACHEOTOMY; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ANIMAL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRICOID CARTILAGE; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; EDUCATION; EMERGENCY; LARYNX; MANIKIN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PIG; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGERY; THYROID CARTILAGE; TIME FACTOR;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; ANIMALS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CRICOID CARTILAGE; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EMERGENCIES; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LARYNX; MANIKINS; SWINE; THYROID CARTILAGE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84941167936     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: 14968975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-015-0430-z     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Wong DT, Lai K, Chung FT, Ho RY. Cannot intubate-cannot ventilate and difficult intubation strategies: results of a Canadian national survey. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1439-46.
2. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 617-31.
3. Kneebone R, Kidd J, Nestel D, Asvall S, Paraskeva P, Darzi A. An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Med Educ 2002; 36: 628-34.
4. Hubert V, Duwat A, Deransy R, Mahjoub Y, Dupont H. Effect of simulation training on compliance with difficult airway management algorithms, technical ability, and skills retention for emergency cricothyrotomy. Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 999-1008.
5. Vadodaria BS, Gandhi SD, McIndoe AK. Comparison of four different emergency airway access equipment sets on a human patient simulator. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 73-9.
6. Kneebone R, Nestel D, Yadollahi F, et al. Assessing procedural skills in context: exploring the feasibility of an Integrated Procedural Performance Instrument (IPPI). Med Educ 2006; 40: 1105-14.
7. Kneebone R. Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: a theory-based approach. Acad Med 2005; 80: 549-53.
8. Hays RT, Singer MJ. Simulator Fidelity in Training Systems Design - Bridging the Gap Between Reality and Training. NY: Springer-Verlag; 1989.
9. Rehmann AJ, Mitman RD, Reynolds MC. A Handbook of Flight Simulation Fidelity Requirements for Human Factors Research. Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center; 1995.
10. Sulaiman L, Tighe SQ, Nelson RA. Surgical vs wire-guided cricothyrotomy: a randomised crossover study of cuffed and uncuffed tracheal tube insertion. Anaesthesia. 2006; 61: 565-70.
11. Olshaker JS, Brown CK, Arthur DC, Tek D. Animal procedure laboratory surveys: use of the animal laboratory to improve physician confidence and ability. J Emerg Med 1989; 7: 593-7.
12. Friedman Z, You-Ten KE, Bould MD, Naik V. Teaching lifesaving procedures: the impact of model fidelity on acquisition and transfer of cricothyrotomy skills to performance on cadavers. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1663-9.
13. Assmann NM, Wong DT, Morales E. A comparison of a new indicator-guided with a conventional wire-guided percutaneous cricothyrotomy device in mannequins. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 148-54.
14. Benkhadra M, Lenfant F, Nemetz W, Anderhuber F, Feigl G, Fasel J. A comparison of two emergency cricothyroidotomy kits in human cadavers. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 182-5.
15. Wong DT, Prabhu AJ, Coloma M, Imasogie N, Chung FF. What is the minimum training required for successful cricothyrotomy?: a study in mannequins. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 349-53.
16. Murphy C, Rooney SJ, Maharaj CH, Laffey JG, Harte BH. Comparison of three cuffed emergency percutaneous cricothyroidotomy devices to conventional surgical cricothyroidotomy in a porcine model. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 57-64.
17. John B, Suri I, Hillermann C, Mendonca C. Comparison of cricothyroidotomy on manikin vs. simulator: a randomised cross-over study. Anesthesia 2007; 62:1029-32.
18. Finan E, Bismilla Z, Whyte HE, Leblanc V, McNamara PJ. High-fidelity simulator technology may not be superior to traditional low-fidelity equipment for neonatal resuscitation training. J Perinatol 2012; 32: 287-92.
19. Khan K, Pattison T, Sherwood M. Simulation in medical education. Med Teach 2011; 33: 1-3.
20. Matsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Radomski SB, Cusimano MD. The effect of bench model fidelity on endourological skills: a randomized controlled study. J Urol 2002; 167: 1243-7.
21. Chandra DB, Savoldelli GL, Joo HS, Weiss ID, Naik VN. Fiberoptic oral intubation: the effect of model fidelity on training for transfer to patient care. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 1007-13.
22. Hayter MA, Friedman Z, Katznelson R, Hanlon JG, Borges B, Naik VN. Effect of sleep deprivation on labour epidural catheter placement. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 619-27.
23. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D, Guest CB. A comparison of global ratings and checklist scores from an undergraduate assessment using an anesthesia simulator. Acad Med 2001; 76: 1053-5.
24. Hoffman KI, Abrahamson S. The ‘cost-effectiveness’ of Sim One. J Med Educ 1975; 50(12 Pt 1): 1127-8.
25. Senn S. Cross-Over Trials in Clinical Research, Second Edition. Wiley; 2002.
26. Greenland KB, Acott C, Segal R, Goulding G, Riley RH, Merry AF. Emergency surgical airway in life-threatening acute airway emergencies–why are we so reluctant to do it? Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39: 578-84.