Identification and comparative expression analysis of odorant binding protein genes in the tobacco cutworm Spodoptera litura

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Gu, Shao Hua ^a   Zhou, Jing Jiang ^b   Gao, Shang ^a,c   Wang, Da Hai ^e   Li, Xian Chun ^a,d   Guo, Yu Yuan ^a   Zhang, Yong Jun ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^b ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^c NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^e Beijing Autolab Biotechnology Company   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSECT PROTEIN; ODORANT-BINDING PROTEIN; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; TRANSCRIPTOME;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; MALE; MOLECULAR GENETICS; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; PARASITOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; POSITION WEIGHT MATRIX; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN MOTIF; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPODOPTERA; TOBACCO;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; INSECT PROTEINS; MALE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PHYLOGENY; POSITION-SPECIFIC SCORING MATRICES; RECEPTORS, ODORANT; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPODOPTERA; TOBACCO; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84941093087     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep13800     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Steinbrecht, R. A. Pore structures in insect olfactory sensilla: a review of data and concepts. Int. J. Insect. Morphol. Embryol. 26, 229-245 (1997).
2. Getchell, T. V., Margolis, F. L. & Getchell, M. L. Perireceptor and receptor events in vertebrate olfaction. Prog. Neurobiol. 23, 317-345 (1984).
3. Vogt, R. G., Riddiford, L. M. & Prestwich, G. D. Kinetic properties of a sex pheromone-degrading enzyme: The sensillar esterase of Antheraea polyphemus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82, 8827-8831 (1985).
4. Leal, W. S. Odorant reception in insects: Roles of receptors, binding proteins, and degrading enzymes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 58, 373-391 (2013).
5. Prestwich, G. D. Proteins that smell: pheromone recognition and signal transduction. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 4, 505-513 (1996).
6. Zhou, J. J. Odorant-binding proteins in insects. Vitam. Horm. 83, 241-272 (2010).
7. Vogt, R. G. & Riddiford, L. M. Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae. Nature 293, 161-163 (1981).
8. Vogt, R. G., Prestwich, G. D. & Lerner, M. R. Odorant-binding-protein subfamilies associate with distinct classes of olfactory receptors neurons in insect. J. Neurobiol. 22, 74-84 (1991).
9. Krieger, J., von Nickisch-Rosenegk, E., Mameli, M., Pelosi, P. & Breer, H. Binding proteins from the antennae of Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 26, 297-307 (1996).
10. Pelosi, P., Iovinella, I., Feliciolim A. & Dani, F. R. Soluble proteins of chemical communication: an overview across arthropods. Front Physiol. 5, 320 (2014).
11. Leal, W. S., Nikonova, L. & Peng, G. Disulfide structure of the pheromone binding protein from the silkworm moth. Bombyx mori. FEBS Lett. 464, 85-90 (1999).
12. Hekmat-Scafe, D. S., Scafe, C. R., McKinney, A. J. & Tanouye, M. A. Genome-wide analysis of the odorant-binding protein gene family in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res. 12, 1357-1369 (2012).
13. Gong, D. P., Zhang, H. J., Zhao, P., Xia, Q. Y. & Xiang, Z. H. The odorant binding protein gene family from the genome of silkworm. Bombyx mori. BMC Genomics 10, 332 (2009).
14. Gu, S. H. et al. Molecular characterization and differential expression of olfactory genes in the antennae of the black cutworm moth Agrotis ipsilon. PLoS ONE 9, e103420 (2014).
15. Klein, U. Sensillum-lymph proteins from antennal olfactory hairs of the moth Antheraea polyphemus (Saturniidae). Insect Biochem. 17, 1193-1204 (1987).
16. Pelosi, P., Mastrogiacomo, R., Iovinella, I., Tuccorim E. & Persaud K. C. Structure and biotechnological applications of odorant-binding proteins. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 61-70 (2014).
17. Steinbrecht, R. A. Odorant-binding proteins: expression and function. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 855, 323-332 (1998).
18. Ziegelberger, R. Redox-shift of the pheromone-binding protein in the silkmoth Antheraea polyphemus. Eur. J. Biochem. 232, 706-711 (1995).
19. Krieger, M. J. & Ross, K. G. Identification of a major gene regulating complex social behavior. Science 295, 328-332 (2002).
20. Xu, P., Atkinson, R., Jones, D. N. & Smith, D. P. Drosophila OBP LUSH is required for activity of pheromone-sensitive neurons. Neuron 45, 193-200 (2005).
21. Sirugue, D., Bonnard, O., Quere, J. L., Farine, J. P. & Brossut, R. 2-Methylthiazolidine and 4-ethylguaiacol, male sex pheromone components of the cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea (dictyoptera, blaberidae): A reinvestigation. J. Chem. Ecol. 18, 2261-2276 (1992).
22. Kim, M. S., Repp, A. & Smith, D. P. LUSH odorant-binding protein mediates chemosensory responses to alcohols in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 150, 711-721 (1998).
23. Pelosi, P., Zhou, J. J., Ban, L. P. & Calvello, M. Soluble proteins in insect chemical communication. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63, 1658-1676 (2006).
24. Qin, H. G., Wang, D. D., Ding, J., Huang, R. H. & Ye, Z. X. Host plants of Spodoptera litura. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi 18, 51-58 (2006).
25. Muthusamy, R., Vishnupriya, M. & Shivakumar, M. S. Biochemical mechanism of chlorantraniliprole resistance in Spodoptera litura (Fab) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 17, 865-869 (2014).
26. Shad, S. A., Sayyed, A. H. & Saleem, M. A. Cross-resistance, mode of inheritance and stability of resistance to emamectin in Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 66, 839-846 (2010).
27. Rehan, A. & Freed, S. Selection, mechanism, cross resistance and stability of spinosad resistance in Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Crop Prot. 56, 10-15 (2014).
28. Pickett, J. A., Woodcock, C. M., Midega, C. A. O. & Khan, Z. R. Push-pull farming systems. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 26, 125-132 (2014).
29. Zhou, Z. S., Chen, Z. P. & Xu, Z. F. Potential of trap crops for integrated management of the tropical armyworm, Spodoptera litura in tobacco. J. Insect Sci. 10, 117 (2009).
30. Yushima, T., Noguchi, H. & Tamaki, Y. Mating and sex pheromone of Spodoptera litura F. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): an introductory report. Appl. Ent. Zool. 8, 18-26 (1973).
31. Reddy, G. V. P. & Guerrero, A. Interactions of insect pheromones and plant semiochemicals. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 253-261 (2004).
32. Witzgall, P., Kirsch, P. & Cork, A. Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management. J. Chem. Ecol. 36, 80-100 (2010).
33. Anderson, I. & Brass, A. Searching DNA databases for similarities to DNA sequences: when is a match significant? Bioinformatics 14, 349-356 (1998).
34. Grosse-Wilde, E. et al. Antennal transcriptome of Manduca sexta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 7449-54 (2011).
35. Jacquin-Joly, E. et al. Candidate chemosensory genes in female antennae of the noctuid moth Spodoptera littoralis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 8, 1036-1050 (2012).
36. Liu, Y., Gu, S., Zhang, Y., Guo, Y. & Wang, G. Candidate olfaction genes identified within the Helicoverpa armigera antennal transcriptome. PLoS ONE 7, e48260 (2012).
37. Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29 (2000).
38. Liu. N. Y., Liu, C. C. & Dong, S. L. Functional differentiation of pheromone-binding proteins in the common cutworm Spodoptera litura. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 165, 254-262 (2013).
39. Liu, N. Y. et al. Two general-odorant binding proteins in Spodoptera litura are differentially tuned to sex pheromones and plant odorants. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 180, 23-31 (2015).
40. Poivet, E. et al. A comparison of the olfactory gene repertoires of adults and larvae in the noctuid moth Spodoptera littoralis. PLoS ONE 8, e60263 (2013).
41. Zhu. J. Y., Zhang, L. F., Ze, S. Z., Wang, D. W. & Yang, B. Identification and tissue distribution of odorant binding protein genes in the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua. J. Insect Physiol. 59, 722-728 (2013).
42. Gu, S. H., Zhou, J. J., Wang, G. R., Zhang, Y. J. & Guo, Y. Y. Sex pheromone recognition and immunolocalization of three pheromone binding proteins in the black cutworm moth Agrotis ipsilon. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43, 237-251 (2013).
43. Tamaki, Y., Noguchi, H. & Yushima, T. Sex pheromone of Spodoptera litura (F). (Lepidoptera Noctuidae) Isolation, identification and synthesis. Appl. Ent. Zool. 8, 200-203 (1973).
44. Tamaki, Y. & Takeshi, Y. Sex pheromone of the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis. J. Insect Physiol. 20, 1005-1014 (1974).
45. Dong, S. L. & Du, J. W. Chemical identification and field tests of sex pheromone of beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua. Acta Phytophy. Sin. 29, 19-24 (2002).
46. Sun, M., Liu, Y. & Wang, G. Expression patterns and binding properties of three pheromone binding proteins in the diamondback moth, Plutella xyllotella. J. Insect Physiol. 59, 46-55 (2013).
47. Xiu, W. M., Zhou, Y. Z. & Dong, S. L. Molecular characterization and expression pattern of two pheromone-binding proteins from Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). J. Chem. Ecol. 34, 487-498 (2008).
48. Feng, B. et al. Transcriptome and expression profiling analysis link patterns of gene expression to antennal responses in Spodoptera litura. BMC Genomics 16, 269 (2015).
49. Glaser, N. et al. Similar differentiation patterns between PBP expression levels and pheromone component ratios in two populations of Sesamia nonagrioides. J. Chem. Ecol. 40, 923-927 (2014).
50. Poivet, E. et al. The use of the sex pheromone as an evolutionary solution to food source selection in caterpillars. Nat. Commun. 3, 1047 (2012).
51. He, X. L. et al. Binding of the general odorant binding protein of Bombyx mori BmorGOBP2 to the moth sex pheromone components. J. Chem. Ecol. 36, 1293-1305 (2010).
52. Zhu, L. M., Ni, Y. P., Cao, X. Y., Huang, C. X. & Cui, Q. A method for artificially rearing to the cotton leafworm Prodenia litura Fabricius. Entomol. Knowl. 38, 227-228 (2001).
53. Lassmann, T., Hayashizaki, Y. & Daub, C. O. TagDust-a program to eliminate artifacts from next generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 25, 2839-2840 (2009).
54. Chou, H. H. & Holmes, M. H. DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal. Bioinformatics 17, 1093-1104 (2001).
55. Chen, Y. A., Lin, C. C., Wang, C. D., Wu, H. B. & Hwang, P. I. An optimized procedure greatly improves EST vector contamination removal. BMC Genomics 8, 416 (2007).
56. Meyer, E. et al. Sequencing and de novo analysis of a coral larval transcriptome using 454 GSFlx. BMC Genomics 10, 219 (2009).
57. Chevreux, B. et al. Using the miraEST assembler for reliable and automated mRNA transcript assembly and SNP detection in sequenced ESTs. Genome Res. 14, 1147-1159 (2004).
58. Huang, X. & Madan, A. CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res. 9, 868-877 (1999).
59. Conesa, A. et al. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21, 3674-3676 (2005).
60. Ye, J. et al. WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W293-W297 (2006).
61. Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotech. 29, 644-52 (2011).
62. Mortazavi, A., Williams, B. A., McCue, K., Schaeffer, L. & Wold, B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods 5, 621-628 (2008).
63. Bailey, T. L. et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W202-W2088 (2009).
64. Petersen, T. N., Brunak, S., Heijne, G. V. & Nielsen, H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 8, 785-786 (2011).
65. Larkin, M. A. et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947-2948 (2007).
66. Saitou, N. & Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406-425 (1987).
67. Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. & Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725-2729 (2013).
68. ΔΔCtmethod. Methods 25, 402-408 (2001).