Enhanced co-citation analysis using frameworks

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 217-229

  Oda, Tetsuaki ^a   Gemba, Kiminori ^a   Matsushima, Katsumori ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bibliographic data; Citation; Co citation; Investment; Life cycle; Patent cluster; Patent strategy; Patent value; R D; Technology transition

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; BIBLIOGRAPHY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; INVESTMENT; LIFE CYCLE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; VALUATION;

EID: 41049087055     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537320801931713     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Carpenter, M., Narin, F. and Woolf, P. (1981) Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Information, pp. 160-163.
2. Kessler, M. M. (1961) An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, 9:1, pp. 49-51.
3. Kessler, M. M. (1963) Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, pp. 10-25.
4. Mogee, M. E. (1990) International patent data for technology analysis and planning. Bethlehem, PA
5. Mogee, Mary, Ellen and Richard, Kolar G. (1999) Patent co-citation analysis of Eli Lilly & Co. patents. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, pp. 291-305. Informa Healthcare, London
6. Narin, F., Rosen, M. and Olivastro, D. (1988) Patent citation analysis: New validation studies and linkage statistics. Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, North-Holland
7. Small, H. G. (1973) Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, pp. 265-269.
8. Trajtenberg, M. (1987) Patents, citations, and innovation; Tracing the links. Cambridge, MA